Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 11:1 (2001) ► pp.31–61

An appraisal of pragmatic elicitation techniques for the social psychological study of talk

The case of request refusals

The focus of the paper is the appropriateness of pragmatic elicitation techniques for generating talk to be used in analyses of talk and social structure. In the best pragmatic elicitation techniques (i) data are generated in situations in which researchers can manipulate variables in the testing of hypotheses, and (ii) speakers can talk freely and spontaneously without awareness that their talk is the object of study. This claim was tested in an examination of the hypothesis that more facework will occur in refusals to a High versus Low status requester. Requester status was manipulated in Oral and Written Discourse Completion, Role Play, and an Experimental elicitation technique. Support for the hypothesis was found only in the Role Play and Experimental conditions. Next, refusals generated in the above four elicitation conditions were compared to Naturally-occurring refusals. At the levels of the acts by which refusals are accomplished and the internal structure of the head act, Oral and Written DC produced anomalous and non-representative refusals. Role Play and the Experimental technique produced refusals that were very similar to Natural refusals, though Role Play refusals tended to be somewhat repetitive and long-winded. It is concluded that an Experimental technique is the preferred pragmatic elicitation technique.

Keywords: Experimental conditions, Role Play, Elicitation, Discourse Completion, Request refusal
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 March 2001
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.11.1.03tur
References
Atkinson, J.M., & J.C. Heritage
(1984) Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, J.B
(1995) Quantitative versus qualitative? In W. Leeds-Hurwitz (ed.), Communication as social construction: Social approaches to the study of communication . New York: Guilford Press, pp. 49-62.Google Scholar
Beebe, L., & M.C. Cummings
(1985) Speech act performance: A function of the data collection procedures? Paper presented at TESOL Convention, New York.
Beebe, L., T. Takahashi, & R. Uliss-Weltz
(1990) Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. Scarcella, E. Andersen, S.D. Krashen& (eds.), On the development of communicative competence in a second language. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House, pp. 55-73.Google Scholar
Bem, D.J., & H.K. McConnell
(1970) Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of premanipulation attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 141: 23-31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., J. House, & G. Kasper
(1989) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, D., M. Gerritsen, & D. de Haan
(1979) Speech differences between women and men: On the wrong track? Language in Society 81: 33-50. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., & S. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., & A. Gilman
(1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T.A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge: Technology Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, P.M
(1986) The acquisition of communicative style in Japanese. In B. Schieffelin E. Ochs& (eds.), Language socialization across cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drummond, K., & R. Hopper
(1993) Back-channels revisited: Acknowledgement tokens and speakership incipiency. Research on Language and Social Interaction 261: 157-177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A., & C. Goodwin
(1992) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D., & J. Potter
(1992) Discursive psychology. London: Sage.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H
(1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H., & H. Sacks
(1970) On formal structures of practical action. In J.G. McKinney E.A. Tiryakian& (eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments . New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 338-366.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H., & D.L. Wieder
(1992) Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & R.M. Seiler (eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology.Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 175-206.Google Scholar
Gilovich, T
(1990) Differential construal and the false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 591: 623-634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E
(1967) Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behavior. Garden City: Doubleday.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1983) The interaction order. American Sociological Review 481: 1-17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C
(1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, pp. 97-121.Google Scholar
(1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C., & J. Heritage
(1990) Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 283-307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.J
(1972) Introduction. In J.J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., pp. 1-25.Google Scholar
Heritage, J
(1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Conversation analysis at century’s en: Practices of talk-in-interaction, their distributions, and their outcomes. Research on Language and Social Interaction 321: 69-76. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Labov, W
(1966) The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Latane, B., & J.M. Darley
(1970) The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help? New York: Appleton- Crofts.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liao, C., & Y. Lii-Shih
(1993) Refusal in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the 4th International Pragmatics Conference, Kobe, Japan.
Miller, D.T., & C. McFarland
(1987) Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 531: 298-305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, P., & W. Turnbull
(1998) Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics 291: 225-256. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R.E., & T.D. Wilson
(1977) Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 841: 231-259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E
(1988) Culture and language development: Language acquisition and language socialization in a Samoan village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1992) Indexing gender. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (eds), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 336-358.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., & B. Schieffelin
(1979) Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., B. Schieffelin, & M. Platt
(1979) Propositions across utterances and speakers. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (eds.), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 251-268.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ohlstain, E
(1989) Apologies across languages. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 155-173.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ong, W.J
(1982) Orality and literacy. New York: Methuen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owen, M
(1983) Apologies and remedial interchanges: A study of language use in social interaction. New York: Mouton Publishers.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, J
(1996) Representing reality : Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, J., & M. Wetherell
(1987) Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behavior. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Prentice, D.A., & D.T. Miller
(1993) Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 641: 243-256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Psathas, G
(1995) Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Resnick, L.B., J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley
(1991) Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rintall, E.M., & C.J. Mitchell
(1989) Studies of requests and apologies: An inquiry into method. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 248-272.Google Scholar
Robinson, W.P
(1985) Social psychology and discourse. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis. Vol. 1: Disciplines of discourse.London: Academic Press, pp. 107-144.Google Scholar
Rose, K
(1992) Speech acts and questionnaires: The effect of hearer response. Journal of Pragmatics 171: 49-62. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J
(1983) How to tell when someone is saying "no" revisited. In: N. Wolfson & E. Judd (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 10-17.Google Scholar
Sacks, H
(1992) Lectures on conversation (Vol. 1 and 2). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., & E.A. Schegloff
(1979) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, pp. 15-21.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A
(1993) Reflections on quantification in studies of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 261: 99-128. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1972) Sequencing in conversational openings. In J.J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 346-380.Google Scholar
Slugoski, B.R., & W. Turnbull
(1988) Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: Sarcasm, banter and social relations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 71: 101-121. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Storms, M.D., & R.E. Nisbett
(1970) Insomnia and the attribution process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 11: 319-328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sudnow, D
(1972) Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Tracy, K
(1993) It's an interesting article! Research on Language and Social Interaction 261: 195-201. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, W
(1992) A conversation approach to explanation, with emphasis on politeness and accounting. In M.L. McLaughlin, M.J. Cody, & S.J. Read (eds.), Explaining oneself to others: Reason-giving in a social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 105-130.Google Scholar
Turnbull, W., & J.I.M. Carpendale
(1999) A social pragmatic model of talk: Implications for research on the development of children’s social understanding. Human Development 421: 328-355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in press) Talk and the development of social understanding. Early Education and Development (Special issue on language socialization during the pre-school years).
Turnbull, W., & K.L. Saxton
(1997) Modal expressions as facework in refusals to comply with requests: I think I should say 'no' right now. Journal of Pragmatics 271: 145-181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, W., & B.R. Slugoski
(1988) Conversational and linguistic processes in causal attribution. In D. Hilton (ed.), Contemporary science and natural explanation: Commonsense conceptions of causality.New York: New York University Press, pp. 69-93.Google Scholar
Ueda, K
(1974) Sixteen ways to avoid saying no in Japan. In J. Condon & M. Saito (eds.), Intercultural encounters with Japan. Tokyo: Simul Press, pp. 185-192.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T.A
(1997) Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction: Vol 2. Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wilson, T.D., & Brekke
(1994) Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin 1161: 117-142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, L.A., & R.O. Kroger
(1994) The analysis of facework in discourse: Review and proposal. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 131: 248-277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 40 other publications

Al-Gahtani, Saad & Carsten Roever
2018. Proficiency and preference organization in second language refusals. Journal of Pragmatics 129 ► pp. 140 ff. DOI logo
Barron, Anne
2007. “Ah no honestly we're okay:” Learning to upgrade in a study abroad context. Intercultural Pragmatics 4:2 DOI logo
Barron, Anne & Klaus P. Schneider
2009. Variational pragmatics: Studying the impact of social factors on language use in interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics 6:4 DOI logo
Bataller Fuster, Rebeca
2013. Role-plays versus natural data: asking for a drink at a cafeteria in Peninsular Spanish. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 18:2 DOI logo
Bella, Spyridoula
2009. Invitations and politeness in Greek: The age variable. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 5:2 DOI logo
Bella, Spyridoula
2011. Mitigation and politeness in Greek invitation refusals: Effects of length of residence in the target community and intensity of interaction on non-native speakers’ performance. Journal of Pragmatics 43:6 ► pp. 1718 ff. DOI logo
Bella, Spyridoula
2014. Developing the ability to refuse: A cross-sectional study of Greek FL refusals. Journal of Pragmatics 61 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Bella, Spyridoula
2022. Offers by Greek FL learners. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Blood, Rosalind
2018. “When you speak to a police officer and (call them)du”. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 3:1 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Byon, Andrew Sangpil
2006. Developing KFL Students’ Pragmatic Awareness of Korean Speech Acts: The Use of Discourse Completion Tasks. Language Awareness 15:4 ► pp. 244 ff. DOI logo
Byon, Andrew Sangpil
2006. The role of linguistic indirectness and honorifics in achieving linguistic politeness in Korean requests. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 2:2 DOI logo
Byon, Andrew Sangpil
2015. Second Language Acquisition. In The Handbook of Korean Linguistics, ► pp. 389 ff. DOI logo
Czerwionka, Lori & Sydney Dickerson
2022. Spanish and English compliment responses in discourse. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 7:1 ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria
2013. Strategies, modification and perspective in native speakers’ requests: A comparison of WDCT and naturally occurring requests. Journal of Pragmatics 53 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam
2018. Investigating the apology strategies of Saudi learners of English. Pragmatics and Society 9:4 ► pp. 598 ff. DOI logo
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam
2018. Saying “Yes” and “No” to requests. Language and Dialogue 8:2 ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam
2021. Compliments and compliment responses in Egyptian and Saudi Arabic. Pragmatics and Society 12:4 ► pp. 537 ff. DOI logo
Salam El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel
2017. The compliment response strategies of Egyptian Arabic-English bilinguals. Language and Dialogue 7:3 ► pp. 387 ff. DOI logo
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam, Jawaher Nasser Alhaqbani & Laila Mardini
2023. How do Saudi EFL learners realize the speech act of request?. Cogent Arts & Humanities 10:2 DOI logo
Fukuya, Yoshinori J. & Alicia Martínez‐Flor
2008. The Interactive Effects of Pragmatic‐Eliciting Tasks and Pragmatic Instruction. Foreign Language Annals 41:3 ► pp. 478 ff. DOI logo
Gonzalez Rodriguez, Milton Fernando
2020. Compliment responses in Icelandic. Language and Dialogue 10:2 ► pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Hellwig, B.
2006. Semantics: Field Work Methods. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 180 ff. DOI logo
Holmes, Janet
2012. Politeness in Intercultural Discourse and Communication. In The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication, ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Kasanga, Luanga A & Joy-Christine Lwanga-Lumu
2007. Cross-cultural linguistic realization of politeness: A study of apologies in English and Setswana. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 3:1 DOI logo
Kasper, Gabriele & Kenneth R. Rose
2002. Epilogue. Language Learning 52:s1 ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Kirner-Ludwig, Monika
2022. Data collection methods applied in studies in the journalIntercultural Pragmatics(2004–2020): a scientometric survey and mixed corpus study. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:4 ► pp. 459 ff. DOI logo
Lefringhausen, Katharina, Helen Spencer-Oatey & Carolin Debray
2019. Culture, Norms, and the Assessment of Communication Contexts: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 50:10 ► pp. 1098 ff. DOI logo
Mohammad Hosseinpur, Rasoul, Reza Bagheri Nevisi & Abdolreza Lowni
2021. A Tale of four measures of pragmatic knowledge in an EFL institutional context. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:1 ► pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Nowosielski, Diána
2016. Az ígéret beszédaktusának vizsgálata a mai magyar nyelvhasználatban. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 3:1 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
O'Connell, Daniel C., Sabine Kowal & Edward J. Dill
2004. Dialogicality in TV news interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 36:2 ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Rebuschat, Patrick & Alison Mackey
2012. Prompted Production. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Ren, Wei
2015. Sociopragmatic Variation in Mainland and Taiwan Chinese Refusals. In Researching Sociopragmatic Variability, ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Riddiford, Nicky & Janet Holmes
2015. Assisting the development of sociopragmatic skills: Negotiating refusals at work. System 48 ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
RIDDIFORD, NICKY & ANGELA JOE
2010. Tracking the Development of Sociopragmatic Skills. TESOL Quarterly 44:1 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Shardakova, Maria
2005. Intercultural pragmatics in the speech of American L2 learners of Russian: Apologies offered by Americans in Russian. Intercultural Pragmatics 2:4 DOI logo
Song, Sooho
2018. Second Language Acquisition Theories. In Second Language Acquisition as a Mode-Switching Process, ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Suszczyńska, Małgorzata
2005. Apology routine formulae in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 52:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Taguchi, Naoko
2018. Chapter 1. Data collection and analysis in developmental L2 pragmatics research. In Critical Reflections on Data in Second Language Acquisition [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 51], ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2006. References. In Gendered Talk at Work, ► pp. 224 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2016. Requests in American and British English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 265], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.