Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 11:3 (2001) ► pp.309–327

The rhetoric of the extraordinary moment

The concession and acceptance speeches of Al Gore and George W. Bush in the 2000 presidential election

The speeches delivered by Al Gore and George W. Bush at the conclusion of the contested 2000 U.S. presidential campaign are of especial interest because they represent a type of political speech that is virtually unique and, because the speakers and their staffs had no previous models to fall back upon, as spontaneous as political utterance currently gets. This paper analyzes those speeches, focusing on the relationships between their forms and what their speakers feel they have to do, and finds interesting similarities as well as differences, in style and content, between them.

Keywords: Acceptance, Political speech, Cencession
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 September 2001
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.11.3.04lak
References
Bronner, Ethan
(2001) Posner vs. Dershowitz. The New York Times Book Review, July 15 2001: 11-12.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
(1994) From Grammar to Politics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
(1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fiske, John
(1996) Media Matters: Race and gender in U.S. politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivins, Molly
(2000) Shrub. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin, & Deborah Tannen
(1984) Communicative strategy and metastrategy in pragmatic theory: The case of Scenes from a Marriage . Semiotica 49.3/4: 323-46.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura
(1995) Civilization and its negotiators. Understanding Disputes: The Politics of Law, ed. Pat Kaplan. Oxford: Berg, pp. 39-63.Google Scholar
(1997) Controlling processes: Tracing the dynamic components of power. Mintz Lecture. Current Anthropology 38.5 (Dec.): 711-737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard
(2001) Breaking the Deadlock. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
(2001) Predicaments of criticism. Critique of Anthropology 21.1: 59-81 (March 2001) DOI: DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Watzlawick, Paul, Janet H. Beavin, & Don D. Jackson
(1967) Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: Norton.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Adedara, Ayodeji A.
2018. “If indeed this is the will of the Ekiti people”. Journal of Language and Politics 17:4 ► pp. 461 ff. DOI logo
Mirer, Michael L & Leticia Bode
2015. Tweeting in defeat: How candidates concede and claim victory in 140 characters. New Media & Society 17:3 ► pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
Pont, Olaf
2007. But We're American… The presence of American Exceptionalism in the Speeches of George W. Bush. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 3:-1 DOI logo
Rudd, Philip W.
2022. Weapons of mass destruction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 499 ff. DOI logo
Tarish, Abbas Hussein
2019. Us Presidents’ Political Discourse Analysis: George W. Bush and Barack Obama. A Pragmatics Approach. Romanian Journal of English Studies 16:1 ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.