Everyday interactions and the domestication of social inequality
This article examines the distribution of relationships of power and authority as an activity in gossip sessions among members of a community in Pohnpei, Micronesia. The position of Bourdieu, that the interactionist approach cannot elucidate important aspects of the sharing of power in society, is used as a starting place to examine ways in which interactants in everyday conversations manipulate and organize gendered identities and the entitlements of certain classes of individuals to particular types of power.
References (40)
Abu-Lughod, Lila (1986) Veiled sentiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bergmann, J. (1993) Discrete indiscretions. The social organization of gossip. New York: Aldine / de Gruyter.
Besnier, Niko (1990) Conflict management, gossip and affective meaning on Nukulaelae. In K. Watson-Gegeo, and G. White (eds.), Disentangling: Conflict discourse in the Pacific. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 290-334.
Billig, Michael (1999) Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and society 10.4: 543-558. BoP
Bogen, David, and Michael Lynch (1990) Social critique and the logic of description. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 505-521.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990) The logic of practice. Richard Nice trans. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1994) Language and symbolic power. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Briggs, Charles (1996) Disorderly discourse: Narrative, conflict, and social inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP
Brison, Karen (1992) Just talk. Berkeley: University of California Press. BoP
Brenneis, Donald (1984) Grog and gossip in Bhatgaon: Style and substance in Fiji Indian conversation. American Ethnologist 111: 3.
Briggs, Charles (ed.) (1996) Disorderly discourse: Narrative, conflict, and social inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP
Cameron, D. (1997) Performing gender identity: Young men's talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In Sally Johnson, and Ulrike Meinhof (eds.), Language and masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Elias, N. (1994) [1939] The Civilizing process. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eckert, P., and S. McConnell-Ginet (1995) Constructing meaning, constructing selves. In K. Hall, and M. Bucholz (eds.), Gender Articulated. New York: Routledge.
Garfinkel, Harold (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. BoP
Goodwin, Marjorie (1990) He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. BoP
Hanks, William F. (1996) Language and communicative practices. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. BoP
Haviland, John (1977) Gossip, reputation, and knowledge in Zinacantan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heritage, John (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jenkins, Richard (1992) Pierre Bourdieu. New York: Routledge.
Keating, Elizabeth (1998) Power sharing: Language, rank, gender and social space in Pohnpei, Micronesia. New York: Oxford University Press. BoP
Kihleng, Kimberly (1996) Women in exchange: Negotiated relations, practice, and the constitution of female power in processes of cultural reproduction and change in Pohnpei, Micronesia. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hawaii. (UMI No. 9700526)
Labov, William (1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. BoP
Lynch, Michael (1999) Silence in context: Ethnomethodology and social theory. Human Studies221: 211-233.
Mauricio, Rufino (1993) Ideological bases for power and leadership on Pohnpei, Micronesia: Perspectives from Archaeology and Oral History. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon (UMI # 9402036).
McHoul, Alec (1988) Language and the sociology of mind: A critical introduction to the work of Jeff Coulter. Journal of Pragmatics 121: 339-386.
Pollner, Melvin (1991) Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity. American Sociological Review 561: 370-380.
Pomerantz, Anita (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-101.
Reisenberg, Saul (1968) The native polity of Ponape. Vol 10 of the Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Sapir, Edward (1921) Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Janovich. BoP
Schegloff, Emanuel (1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 701: 1075-95. BoP
Schegloff, Emanuel (1998) Reply to Wetherell . Discourse and Society 9.3: 413-416. BoP
Schegloff, Emanuel (1999) Naivete vs sophistication or discipline vs self-indulgence: A rejoinder to Billig. Discourse and Society 10.4: 577-582.
Speer, Susan (2001) Reconsidering the concept of hegemonic masculinity: Discursive psychology, conversation analysis and participants’ orientations. Feminism and Psychology 11.1: 107-135.
Thompson, John (ed.) (1994) Editor’s introduction. In Pierre Bourdieu Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Titscher, S., M. Meyer, R. Wodak, & R. Vetter (2000) Methods of text and discourse analysis Translated byB. Jenner. London: Sage. BoP
Wetherell, Margaret (1998) Positioning and interpretive repertoires: Conversation analysis and post- structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society 9.3: 387-412.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Keating, Elizabeth
2009.
Power and Pragmatics.
Language and Linguistics Compass 3:4
► pp. 996 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.