Article published in:
Vol. 13:3 (2003) ► pp. 363379


Attention, accessibility, and the addressee
Anderson, S.R., and E.L. Keenan
(1985) Deixis. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 259-308.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas
(2001) Spatial deixis in Jahai. Paper presented at the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (SEALS) XI , Bangkok, Thailand, May 16-18, 2001.
(2002)  A grammar of Jahai . Ph.D. dissertation, Lund University.
submitted) Distance undone: New light on the Jahai multi-term demonstrative system. In Michael Dunn and Sérgio Meira (eds.) Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective
in prep) Referring to the Beyond: Exterior demonstratives in Jahai.
Diessel, Holger
(1999) Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Demonstratives in language use and grammar. Paper from lectures given at the San Marino Summer School, 9-12 June 2003.
Dixon, R.M.W.
(2003) Demonstratives: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in language 27.1: 62-112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meira, Sérgio
(2003) ‘Addressee effects’ in demonstrative systems: The cases of Tiriyó and Brazilian Portuguese. In F. Lenz (ed.), Deictic conceptualization of space, time and person.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 3-12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
submitted) Non-contrastive exophoric uses of Tiriyó demonstratives. In Michael Dunn and Sérgio Meira (eds.) Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective
Özyürek, Asli
(1998) An analysis of the basic meaning of Turkish demonstratives in face-to-face conversational interaction. In S. Santi, I. Guaitella, C. Cave and G. Konopczynski (eds.), Oralité et gestualité: Communication multimodale, interaction.Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 609-614.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank
(2003) Encoding shape: Formal means and semantic distinctions. In Nick Enfield (ed.), Field research manual 2003 part I: Multimodal interaction, space, event representation.Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, pp. 57-59.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David P.
(1999) The 1999 demonstrative questionnaire: “THIS” and “THAT” in comparative perspective. In David P. Wilkins (ed.), Manual for the 1999 field season. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 23 other publications

Bergqvist, Henrik
2015. Epistemic marking and multiple perspective: An introduction. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 68:2 Crossref logo
Bergqvist, Henrik
2020. Swedish modal particles as markers of engagement: Evidence from distribution and frequency. Folia Linguistica 54:2  pp. 469 ff. Crossref logo
Burenhult, Niclas
2008. Spatial coordinate systems in demonstrative meaning. Linguistic Typology 12:1 Crossref logo
Cooperrider, Kensy
2016. The Co-Organization of Demonstratives and Pointing Gestures. Discourse Processes 53:8  pp. 632 ff. Crossref logo
Coventry, Kenny R., Debra Griffiths & Colin J. Hamilton
2014. Spatial demonstratives and perceptual space: Describing and remembering object location. Cognitive Psychology 69  pp. 46 ff. Crossref logo
Diessel, Holger
2014. Demonstratives, Frames of Reference, and Semantic Universals of Space. Language and Linguistics Compass 8:3  pp. 116 ff. Crossref logo
Diessel, Holger & Kenny R. Coventry
2020. Demonstratives in Spatial Language and Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Review. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo
Edwards, Terra & Diane Brentari
2021. The Grammatical Incorporation of Demonstratives in an Emerging Tactile Language. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo
Enfield, N. J.
2018.  In Mainland Southeast Asian Languages, Crossref logo
2018. The grammar of engagement I: framework and initial exemplification. Language and Cognition 10:1  pp. 110 ff. Crossref logo
Hanks, William F.
2009. Fieldwork on deixis. Journal of Pragmatics 41:1  pp. 10 ff. Crossref logo
Khachaturyan, Maria
2020. Common Ground in Demonstrative Reference: The Case of Mano (Mande). Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo
Knuchel, Dominique
2020. Exploring Kogi epistemic marking in interactional elicitation tasks: A report from the field. Folia Linguistica 54:2  pp. 447 ff. Crossref logo
Knuchel, Dominique
2020. Exploring Kogi epistemic marking in interactional elicitation tasks: A report from the field. Folia Linguistica 54:2  pp. 447 ff. Crossref logo
Mauri, Simone
2020. Time and shared knowledge in the demonstrative system of Ayt Atta Tamazight (Berber). Lingua 247  pp. 102812 ff. Crossref logo
Mesh, Kate, Emiliana Cruz, Joost van de Weijer, Niclas Burenhult & Marianne Gullberg
2021. Effects of Scale on Multimodal Deixis: Evidence From Quiahije Chatino. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo
Peeters, David, Peter Hagoort & Aslı Özyürek
2015. Electrophysiological evidence for the role of shared space in online comprehension of spatial demonstratives. Cognition 136  pp. 64 ff. Crossref logo
Peeters, David, Emiel Krahmer & Alfons Maes
2020. A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Crossref logo
Peeters, David & Aslı Özyürek
2016. This and That Revisited: A Social and Multimodal Approach to Spatial Demonstratives. Frontiers in Psychology 7 Crossref logo
Rubio-Fernandez, Paula
2020. Pragmatic markers: the missing link between language and Theory of Mind. Synthese Crossref logo
Tóth, Enikő & Péter Csatár
2014. A főnévi mutató névmások indexikális használatát befolyásoló tényezők a magyarban. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 1:1  pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo
Tóth, Enikő & Péter Csatár
2015. Egy interfész jelenség: indexikális demonstratívumok azonosító fókuszban. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 2:1  pp. 63 ff. Crossref logo
Yager, Joanne & Niclas Burenhult
2017. Jedek: A newly discovered Aslian variety of Malaysia. Linguistic Typology 21:3 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.