Article published In:
PragmaticsVol. 13:3 (2003) ► pp.363–379
Attention, accessibility, and the addressee
The case of the Jahai demonstrative ton
The detailed semantic encoding of demonstrative systems of the world’s languages has come under increased scrutiny in recent years. One important finding is that spatial (notably distance) encoding, normally considered to lie at the heart of exophoric demonstrative semantics, may be rivalled as to its ‘basicness’ by more discourse-related forms of encoding, such as the status of the addressee’s attention in relation to the referent. This paper investigates the attentional characteristics of ton, a nominal demonstrative in Jahai (Mon-Khmer, Malay Peninsula) previously considered to encode spatial proximity to addressee. It does so in light of naturalistic interaction data from a specific object-identification task originally aimed at eliciting shape-encoding distinctions (Seifart 2003).
Keywords: Attentional contrasts, Demonstratives, Jahai, Matching game, Cognitive accessibility, Addressee
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Anderson, S.R., and E.L. Keenan
(1985) Deixis. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 259-308.
Burenhult, Niclas
(2001) Spatial deixis in Jahai. Paper presented at the
Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (SEALS) XI
, Bangkok, Thailand, May 16-18, 2001.
(2002)
A grammar of Jahai
. Ph.D. dissertation, Lund University.
submitted) Distance undone: New light on the Jahai multi-term demonstrative system. In Michael Dunn and Sérgio Meira (eds.) Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective
in prep) Referring to the Beyond: Exterior demonstratives in Jahai.
Diessel, Holger
(1999) Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 
(2003) Demonstratives in language use and grammar. Paper from lectures given at the San Marino Summer School, 9-12 June 2003.
Dixon, R.M.W
Meira, Sérgio
(2003) ‘Addressee effects’ in demonstrative systems: The cases of Tiriyó and Brazilian Portuguese. In F. Lenz (ed.), Deictic conceptualization of space, time and person.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 3-12.
submitted) Non-contrastive exophoric uses of Tiriyó demonstratives. In Michael Dunn and Sérgio Meira (eds.) Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective
Özyürek, Asli
(1998) An analysis of the basic meaning of Turkish demonstratives in face-to-face conversational interaction. In S. Santi, I. Guaitella, C. Cave and G. Konopczynski (eds.), Oralité et gestualité: Communication multimodale, interaction.Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 609-614.
Seifart, Frank
(2003) Encoding shape: Formal means and semantic distinctions. In Nick Enfield (ed.), Field research manual 2003 part I: Multimodal interaction, space, event representation.Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, pp. 57-59.
Wilkins, David P
(1999) The 1999 demonstrative questionnaire: “THIS” and “THAT” in comparative perspective. In David P. Wilkins (ed.), Manual for the 1999 field season. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Cited by
Cited by 26 other publications
Bergqvist, Henrik
2015. Epistemic marking and multiple perspective: An introduction
. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 68:2 ► pp. 123 ff. 
Bergqvist, Henrik
2020. Swedish modal particles as markers of engagement: Evidence from distribution and frequency. Folia Linguistica 54:2 ► pp. 469 ff.
Burenhult, Niclas
2008. Spatial coordinate systems in demonstrative meaning. Linguistic Typology 12:1
Cooperrider, Kensy
2016. The Co-Organization of Demonstratives and Pointing Gestures. Discourse Processes 53:8 ► pp. 632 ff.
Coventry, Kenny R., Debra Griffiths & Colin J. Hamilton
2014. Spatial demonstratives and perceptual space: Describing and remembering object location. Cognitive Psychology 69 ► pp. 46 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2014. Demonstratives, Frames of Reference, and Semantic Universals of Space. Language and Linguistics Compass 8:3 ► pp. 116 ff.
Diessel, Holger & Kenny R. Coventry
2020. Demonstratives in Spatial Language and Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Review. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Edwards, Terra & Diane Brentari
2021. The Grammatical Incorporation of Demonstratives in an Emerging Tactile Language. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Enfield, N. J.
2018. Mainland Southeast Asian Languages,
EVANS, NICHOLAS, HENRIK BERGQVIST & LILA SAN ROQUE
2018. The grammar of engagement I: framework and initial exemplification. Language and Cognition 10:1 ► pp. 110 ff.
González Pérez, Manuel David
2023. Spheres of interest: Space and social cognition in Phola deixis. Open Linguistics 9:1
Hanks, William F.
2009. Fieldwork on deixis. Journal of Pragmatics 41:1 ► pp. 10 ff.
Khachaturyan, Maria
2020. Common Ground in Demonstrative Reference: The Case of Mano (Mande). Frontiers in Psychology 11
Knuchel, Dominique
2020. Exploring Kogi epistemic marking in interactional elicitation tasks: A report from the field. Folia Linguistica 54:2 ► pp. 447 ff.
Knuchel, Dominique
2020. Exploring Kogi epistemic marking in interactional elicitation tasks: A report from the field. Folia Linguistica 54:2 ► pp. 447 ff.
Mauri, Simone
2020. Time and shared knowledge in the demonstrative system of Ayt Atta Tamazight (Berber). Lingua 247 ► pp. 102812 ff.
Mesh, Kate, Emiliana Cruz, Joost van de Weijer, Niclas Burenhult & Marianne Gullberg
2021. Effects of Scale on Multimodal Deixis: Evidence From Quiahije Chatino. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Obert, Karolin
2023. Andreas H. Jucker/Heiko Hausendorf (Hg.). 2022. Pragmatics of Space (Handbooks of Pragmatics 14). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. 747 S.. Zeitschrift für Rezensionen zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft 15:1-2 ► pp. 19 ff.
Peeters, David, Peter Hagoort & Aslı Özyürek
2015. Electrophysiological evidence for the role of shared space in online comprehension of spatial demonstratives. Cognition 136 ► pp. 64 ff.
Peeters, David, Emiel Krahmer & Alfons Maes
2021. A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 28:2 ► pp. 409 ff.
Peeters, David & Aslı Özyürek
2016. This and That Revisited: A Social and Multimodal Approach to Spatial Demonstratives. Frontiers in Psychology 7
Rubio-Fernandez, Paula
2021. Pragmatic markers: the missing link between language and Theory of Mind. Synthese 199:1-2 ► pp. 1125 ff.
SKILTON, Amalia
2023. Learning speaker- and addressee-centered demonstratives in Ticuna. Journal of Child Language 50:3 ► pp. 632 ff.
Tóth, Enikő & Péter Csatár
2014. A főnévi mutató névmások indexikális használatát befolyásoló tényezők a magyarban. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 1:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
Tóth, Enikő & Péter Csatár
2015. Egy interfész jelenség: indexikális demonstratívumok azonosító fókuszban. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 2:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Yager, Joanne & Niclas Burenhult
2017. Jedek: A newly discovered Aslian variety of Malaysia. Linguistic Typology 21:3
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.