Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 15:1 (2005) ► pp. 2547
References
Beattie, G
(1983) Talk. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Brower, C.E., and J. Wagner
(2004) Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1.1: 29-47. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., O. Tsuyoshi, and S. Vorreiter
(2003) Incrementing in conversation: A comparison of methods in English, German and Japanese. Paper given at the 8th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA), Toronto Canada, July 13-18.
Drummond, K
(1989) A backward glance at interruptions. Western Journal of Speech Communication 531: 150-66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, N
(1977) Simultaneous speech, interruptions and dominance. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 16.4: 295-302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C
(2003) Turn construction and the discourse and grammar research agenda. Paper given at the 2003 Georgetown University Round Table, Washington DC.
Ford, C., B. Fox, and S. Thompson
(1996) Practices in the construction of turns: The "TCU" revisited. Pragmatics 6.3: 427-454.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C., and S. Thompson
(1996) Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff and S. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 134-184. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2003) Pragmatic projection and the place of “action” in turn construction. Paper given at the 8th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA), Toronto Canada, July 13-18.
Garside, R., G. Leech, and A. McEnery
(1997) Corpus annotation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Goldberg, J
(1983) A move towards describing conversational coherence. In R.T. Craig and K. Tracy (eds.), Conversational coherence: Form, structure and strategy. London: Sage, pp. 22-45.Google Scholar
(1990) Interrupting the discourse on interruptions: An analysis in terms of relationally neutral, power and rapport oriented acts. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 883-903. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Greatbatch, D
(1992) On the management of disagreement between news interviewees. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 268-301.Google Scholar
Hutchby, I., and R. Woofitt
(1998) Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G
(1983) Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature, 281. The Netherlands: Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C
(1996) La Conversation. Paris: Seuil.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mey, I
(2001) The CA/CAD controversy. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 609-615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murray, S
(1985) Toward a model of members’ methods for recognising interruptions. Language in Society 131: 31-41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, D., L. Slattery Rashotte, and L. Smith-Lovin
(2002) Measuring interruption: Syntactic and contextual methods of coding conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly 65.1: 38-55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roger, D., P. Bull, and S. Smith
(1988) The development of a comprehensive system for classifying interruptions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 71: 27-34. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E
(1997) Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society 8.2: 165-187. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Talbot, M
(1992) “I wish you’d stop interrupting me!”. Interruptions and asymmetries in speaker rights in equal encounters. Journal of Pragmatics 161: 451-466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff,. and G. Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn taking for conversation. Language 501: 696-735. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Selting, M
(2000) The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society 291: 477-517. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D
(1994) Gender and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ten Have, P
(1990) Methodological issues in conversation analysis. Bulletin de méthodologie sociologique 271: 23-51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
West, C., and D. Zimmerman
(1983) Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations with unacquainted persons. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae and N. Henley (eds.), Language, gender and society.Rowley M.A.: Newbury House, pp. 102-17.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Zamouri, S
(1995) La formation de coalitions dans les conversations triadiques. In C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni et C. Plantin (eds.), LeTrilogue. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon, pp. 54-79.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D., and C. West
(1975) Sex role, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne and N. Henley (eds.), Language and sex. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, pp. 105-29.Google Scholar

Full-text

Revisiting the methodological debate on interruptions
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Blair-Loy, Mary, Laura Rogers, Daniela Glaser, Y. Wong, Danielle Abraham & Pamela Cosman
2017. Gender in Engineering Departments: Are There Gender Differences in Interruptions of Academic Job Talks?. Social Sciences 6:1  pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Bogetic, Ksenija
2011. Interruptions and the dyadic co-narration of shared experiences in English and Serbian conversation. Language & Communication 31:4  pp. 318 ff. Crossref logo
Béal, Christine & Kerry Mullan
2017. The pragmatics of conversational humour in social visits: French and Australian English. Language & Communication 55  pp. 24 ff. Crossref logo
Guillot, Marie-Noëlle
2008. Freedoms and constraints in semi-institutional television discussions: The case of mixed format panel discussions. Journal of Pragmatics 40:2  pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
Tobback, Els
2014. À chacun son tour: analyse comparative des styles conversationnels des néerlandophones et des francophones de Belgique dans des débats télévisés. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 59:3  pp. 373 ff. Crossref logo
Xudong, Deng
2008.  In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.