Recurrence marking in Akan
The linguistic phenomenon of recurrence is identified in two aspects; either as a repetition of an action or a restoration to a former state. This paper examines two lexical items, an auxiliary verb san and an adverb (e)bio, which encode this phenomenon in Akan. The recurrence marker san is claimed to be the output of a grammaticalization process which has as its historical input a phonologically identical lexical verb with a restorative meaning. Even though the recurrence marker san is diachronically associated with restoration, its use gives rise to either a restorative or a repetitive assumption, in the form of an implicated premise. This assumption forms part of the context within which the utterance containing san is interpreted. Thus its function coincides with that of (e)bio, except for one particular use of the latter, associated with its occurrence at utterance-initial position. The almost identical functions of these two markers reveal the close conceptual relationship between recurrence of the repetitive and of the restorative type.
Keywords: Akan, Implicature, Grammaticalization, Recurrence, Relevance theory
This article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 June 2005
Amfo, N.A.A., S.A. Boateng, and T. Fretheim
(2001) Pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation: A relevance-theoretic approach to the language of adolescents. Pragmatics and Beyond, New series, 84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
Andersen, G., and T. Fretheim
(eds.) (2000) Pragmatic markers and propositional attitude. Pragmatics and Beyond, New series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
(1992) Understanding utterances: An introduction to pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. BoP
(2002) Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
(1990) Relevance relations in discourse: A study with special reference to Sissala. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
(2002) Thoughts and Utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. MetBib
Fretheim, T., S.A. Boateng, and I. Vaskó
(2003) Then -adverbial pro-form or inference particle? A comparative study of English, Ewe, Hungarian and Norwegian. In K.M. Jaszczolt and K. Turner (eds.), Meaning through language contrast. Vol. 2. Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series.Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 51-74. BoP
Heine, B., U. Claudi, and F. Hünnemeyer
(1991) Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. BoP
Heine, B., and M. Reh
Hopper, P.J., and E.C. Traugott
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. BoP
(1995) Thoughts on grammaticalization. Lincom studies in theoretical linguistics. München: Lincom Europa. BoP
(1994) Aspects of Akan Grammar: A functional perspective. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oregon.
(2004) Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Sperber, D., and D. Wilson
(1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition. 2nd edition with a postface. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. First published 1986. MetBib
Cited by other publications
Appah, Clement K. I. & Nana Aba Appiah Amfo
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.