Article published in:
Vol. 17:3 (2007) ► pp. 351370


Exercising politeness
Bourdieu, Pierre
(1991) Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
(1994) Conversation Analysis. In R.E. Asher (ed), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp.749-754.Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino
(2001) A critique of politeness theories. Manchester, UK: St.Jerome Publishing.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ferenčík, Milan
(2004) Social categorization and politeness in the media discourse. In Sučasni doslidženia z inozemnoj filologii 2, Užgorod: Užgorodskij nacionaľnyj universitet, pp. 94-104.Google Scholar
(1995) Štruktúra rozhlasového dialógu. Slovenská reč 60.5-6: 281-288.Google Scholar
(2002) Organizácia a priebeh úvodných fáz rozhlasovej kontaktnej relácie Nočné dialógy. Slovo a slovesnost 63: 200-212.Google Scholar
(2005a) Repair and identity construction in talk-in-interaction. In English Is a Key. Ružomberok 2005, pp. 40-52.Google Scholar
(2005b) Identita a zdvorilosť – k problému sociálnej kategorizácie v mediálnom dialógu. In J. Rusnák a M. Bočák (eds), Médiá a text. FF PU, Prešov, pp.63-86.Google Scholar
(2005c) Organization of repair in talk-in-interaction and politeness. Theory and practice in English studies 3 (2005). Eighth Conference of British, American and Canadian Studies. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, pp. 69-78.
(2006a) Non-impolite interruptions: Politeness aspects of recognitional interruptions on talk radio. Discourse Studies: Trends and perspectives. Nitra: FF UKF, pp. 47-58.Google Scholar
(2006b) Členská kategorizácia v politickom diskurze a zdvorilosť. (Membership categorization in political discourse and politeness) (in press).
Fitzgerald, Richard
(msa) Talkback, community and the public sphere.
(msb) Two axes of communication in talkback radio: Some techniques for building community and delivering politics agendas through public access media.
Fitzgerald, Richard, and William Housley
(2002) Identity, categorization and sequential organization: The sequential and categorial flow of identity in a radio phone-in. Discourse & Society 13.5: 579-602. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Francis, David, and Stephen Hester
(2004) An invitation to ethnomethodology: Language, society and interaction. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
(1989) Current developments in conversation analysis. In Roger, D. and P. Bull (eds.), Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective.Clevedon-Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters LTD, pp. 21-47.Google Scholar
He, Agnes W.
(2004) Identity construction in Chinese heritage language classes. Pragmatics 4.2/3: 199-216.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hester Stephen, and Richard Fitzgerald
(1999) Category, predicate and task: Some organizational features in a radio talk show. In P. Jalbert (ed.), Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. SECA, No. 5. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
(1991) The organization of talk on talk radio. In P. Scannell (ed.), Broadcast Talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
(1992a) Confrontation talk: Aspects of ´interruption´ in argument sequences on talk radio. Text 12.3: 343-371.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992b) The pursuit of controversy: Routine scepticism in talk on “talk radio”. Sociology 26.4: 673-694. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Aspects of recipient design in expert advice giving on call-in radio. Discourse Processes 19: 217-238. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996a) Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show. Discourse & Society Vol. 7.4: 481-497. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996b) Confrontation Talk. Arguments, Assymetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
(1999) Frame attunement and footing in the organisation of talk radio show. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3.1: 41-63. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2001) ´Witnessing´: The use of first-hand knowledge in legitimating lay opinions on talk radio. Discourse Studies. Vol 3.4: 481-497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian, and Paul Drew
(1995) Conversation Analysis. In J.-O. Ostman, J. Verschueren, & L. Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.282-289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian, and Robin Wooffitt
(2002) Conversation Analysis. Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
(1997) A multilevel approach in the study of talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics 7.1: 1-20.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London & New York:  BoPGoogle Scholar
Longman.Leudar, Ivan, Victoria Marsland, and Jiří Nekvapil
(2004) On membership categorization: ´us´, ´them´ and ´doing violence´ in political discourse. Discourse & Society Vol 15.2-3: 243-266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony, Annie Brown, Susanne Döpke, and Kristina Love
(1992) The effect of the institution: Openings in talkback radio. Text 12.4: 541-562.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony, Susanne Döpke, Kristina Love, and Annie Brown
(1994) Presenting a point of view: Callers´ contributions to talkback radio in Australia. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 139-156. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Nekvapil, Jiří
(2000/2001) Sociální kategorizace v interkulturním kontaktu: Základní výklad, cvičení a diskuse dvou scén z podnikové komunikace. Češtinář 11: 38-52, 72-84.Google Scholar
Panese, M.
(1996) Calling in: Prosody and conversation in radio-talk. Pragmatics 6: 1.19-87.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shields-Brodber, Kathryn
(1992) Dynamism and assertiveness in the public voice: Turn-taking and code-switching in radio talk shows in Jamaica. Pragmatics 2.4: 487-504. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna
(2001a) Questions, control and the organization of talks in calls to a radio phone-in. Discourse Studies Vol 3.1: 119-143. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Authenticating talk: Building public identities in audience participation boadcasting. Discourse Studies Vol 3.4: 459-479. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Watson, Rod D.
(1997) ´Some general reflections on „categorization“ and „sequence“ in the analysis of conversation´. In S. Hester and P. Eglin (eds.), Culture in Action. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard
(2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Clark, Tom
2011. Sorryness as Public Poetics: Rhetorical Figuration and Poetic Formulas in the Australian and Canadian 2008 Parliamentary Apology Debates. SSRN Electronic Journal Crossref logo
Clark, Tom & Ravi de Costa
2013.  In Storytelling: Critical and Creative Approaches,  pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo
Mohd Nor, Siti Nurbaya
2021. Constructing ethnic and national identities in talk on Malaysian issues. Discourse & Society 32:1  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
O’Driscoll, Jim
2011.  In Politeness Across Cultures,  pp. 17 ff. Crossref logo
Ruhi, Şükriye
2010. Face as an indexical category in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 42:8  pp. 2131 ff. Crossref logo
Shrikant, Natasha
2014. “It’s like, ‘I’ve never met a lesbian before!’”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 24:4  pp. 799 ff. Crossref logo
Shrikant, Natasha
2018. “There’s no such thing as Asian”: A membership categorization analysis of cross-cultural adaptation in an Asian American business community. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 11:4  pp. 286 ff. Crossref logo
Thornborrow, Joanna & Richard Fitzgerald
2013. “Grab a pen and paper”. Journal of Language and Politics 12:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Van De Mieroop, Dorien
2008. Co-constructing identities in speeches. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 18:3  pp. 491 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.