Article published In:
Vol. 17:3 (2007) ► pp.351370
Bourdieu, Pierre
(1991) Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
(1994) Conversation Analysis. In R.E. Asher (ed), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp.749-754.Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino
(2001) A critique of politeness theories. Manchester, UK: St.Jerome Publishing.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ferenčík, Milan
(2004) Social categorization and politeness in the media discourse. In Sučasni doslidženia z inozemnoj filologii 2, Užgorod: Užgorodskij nacionaľnyj universitet, pp. 94-104.Google Scholar
(1995) Štruktúra rozhlasového dialógu. Slovenská reč 60.5-6: 281-288.Google Scholar
(2002) Organizácia a priebeh úvodných fáz rozhlasovej kontaktnej relácie Nočné dialógy. Slovo a slovesnost 631: 200-212.Google Scholar
(2005a) Repair and identity construction in talk-in-interaction. In English Is a Key. Ružomberok 2005, pp. 40-52.Google Scholar
(2005b) Identita a zdvorilosť – k problému sociálnej kategorizácie v mediálnom dialógu. In J. Rusnák a M. Bočák (eds), Médiá a text. FF PU, Prešov, pp.63-86.Google Scholar
(2005c) Organization of repair in talk-in-interaction and politeness. Theory and practice in English studies 3 (2005). Eighth Conference of British, American and Canadian Studies. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, pp. 69-78.
(2006a) Non-impolite interruptions: Politeness aspects of recognitional interruptions on talk radio. Discourse Studies: Trends and perspectives. Nitra: FF UKF, pp. 47-58.Google Scholar
(2006b) Členská kategorizácia v politickom diskurze a zdvorilosť. (Membership categorization in political discourse and politeness) (in press).
Fitzgerald, Richard
(msa) Talkback, community and the public sphere. DOI logo
(msb) Two axes of communication in talkback radio: Some techniques for building community and delivering politics agendas through public access media.
Fitzgerald, Richard, and William Housley
(2002) Identity, categorization and sequential organization: The sequential and categorial flow of identity in a radio phone-in. Discourse & Society 13.5: 579-602. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Francis, David, and Stephen Hester
(2004) An invitation to ethnomethodology: Language, society and interaction. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
(1989) Current developments in conversation analysis. In Roger, D. and P. Bull (eds.), Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective.Clevedon-Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters LTD, pp. 21-47.Google Scholar
He, Agnes W.
(2004) Identity construction in Chinese heritage language classes. Pragmatics 4.2/3: 199-216.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hester Stephen, and Richard Fitzgerald
(1999) Category, predicate and task: Some organizational features in a radio talk show. In P. Jalbert (ed.), Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. SECA, No. 5. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
(1991) The organization of talk on talk radio. In P. Scannell (ed.), Broadcast Talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
(1992a) Confrontation talk: Aspects of ´interruption´ in argument sequences on talk radio. Text 12.3: 343-371.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992b) The pursuit of controversy: Routine scepticism in talk on “talk radio”. Sociology 26.4: 673-694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) Aspects of recipient design in expert advice giving on call-in radio. Discourse Processes 191: 217-238. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996a) Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show. Discourse & Society Vol. 7.4: 481-497. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996b) Confrontation Talk. Arguments, Assymetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
(1999) Frame attunement and footing in the organisation of talk radio show. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3.1: 41-63. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2001) ´Witnessing´: The use of first-hand knowledge in legitimating lay opinions on talk radio. Discourse Studies. Vol 3.4: 481-497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian, and Paul Drew
(1995) Conversation Analysis. In J.-O. Ostman, J. Verschueren, & L. Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.282-289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian, and Robin Wooffitt
(2002) Conversation Analysis. Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
Leech, Geoffrey
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London & New York:  BoPGoogle Scholar
Longman.Leudar, Ivan, Victoria Marsland, and Jiří Nekvapil
(2004) On membership categorization: ´us´, ´them´ and ´doing violence´ in political discourse. Discourse & Society Vol 15.2-3: 243-266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony, Annie Brown, Susanne Döpke, and Kristina Love
(1992) The effect of the institution: Openings in talkback radio. Text 12.4: 541-562.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony, Susanne Döpke, Kristina Love, and Annie Brown
(1994) Presenting a point of view: Callers´ contributions to talkback radio in Australia. Journal of Pragmatics 221: 139-156. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Nekvapil, Jiří
(2000/2001) Sociální kategorizace v interkulturním kontaktu: Základní výklad, cvičení a diskuse dvou scén z podnikové komunikace. Češtinář 11: 38-52, 72-84.Google Scholar
Panese, M.
(1996) Calling in: Prosody and conversation in radio-talk. Pragmatics 6: 1.19-87.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna
(2001a) Questions, control and the organization of talks in calls to a radio phone-in. Discourse Studies Vol 3.1: 119-143. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Authenticating talk: Building public identities in audience participation boadcasting. Discourse Studies Vol 3.4: 459-479. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Watson, Rod D.
(1997) ´Some general reflections on „categorization“ and „sequence“ in the analysis of conversation´. In S. Hester and P. Eglin (eds.), Culture in Action. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard
(2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Clark, Tom
2011. Sorryness as Public Poetics: Rhetorical Figuration and Poetic Formulas in the Australian and Canadian 2008 Parliamentary Apology Debates. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Clark, Tom & Ravi de Costa
2013. Testimonial Textures: Examining the Poetics of Non-Indigenous Stories about Reconciliation. In Storytelling: Critical and Creative Approaches,  pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Clift, Rebecca & Michael Haugh
2021. Conversation Analysis and Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 616 ff. DOI logo
Mohd Nor, Siti Nurbaya
2021. Constructing ethnic and national identities in talk on Malaysian issues. Discourse & Society 32:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
O’Driscoll, Jim
2011. Some Issues with the Concept of Face: When, What, How and How Much?. In Politeness Across Cultures,  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Ruhi, Şükriye
2010. Face as an indexical category in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 42:8  pp. 2131 ff. DOI logo
Shrikant, Natasha
2018. “There’s no such thing as Asian”: A membership categorization analysis of cross-cultural adaptation in an Asian American business community. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 11:4  pp. 286 ff. DOI logo
Shrikant, Natasha
2022. “It’s like, ‘I’ve never met a lesbian before!’”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 799 ff. DOI logo
Thornborrow, Joanna & Richard Fitzgerald
2013. “Grab a pen and paper”. Journal of Language and Politics 12:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Van De Mieroop, Dorien
2022. Co-constructing identities in speeches. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 491 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 567 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.