Article published In:
Turn continuation in cross-linguistic perspectiveEdited by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Pragmatics 17:4] 2007
► pp. 647–658
Edited by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Pragmatics 17:4] 2007
► pp. 647–658
Why are increments such elusive objects? An afterthought
It is argued that the type of unit expansions called ‘increments’ by Schegloff 1996 is too narrowly focused on English. While the structure of English makes it particularly suited for this kind of expansion, a typologically more satisfactory approach to unit expansion runs into problems if it remains on the syntactic plane alone. A full typology will have to take into account, not only prosody and semantics, but also action structure and pragmatics at large.
Keywords: unit expansion, TCU, Increment
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Auer, Peter
(1991) Vom Ende deutscher Sätze. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 19.2: 139-157. 
(1992) The neverending sentence: Rightward expansion in spoken language. In M. Kontra, and T. Váradi (eds.), Studies in Spoken Languages: English, German, Finno-Ugric.Budapest: Linguistic Institute at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, pp 41-59.
(1996) On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 51-100.
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson
(2002) Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In eaedem (eds), The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp 14-38. BoP
Schegloff, Emanuel
(1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In: E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 52-133. BoP
BoPUhmann, Susanne
(1997) Grammatische Regeln und Konversationelle Strategien. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Vorreiter, Susanne
Cited by
Cited by 24 other publications
Auer, Peter
2015. The temporality of language in interaction. In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27], ► pp. 27 ff. 
Auer, Peter & Jan Lindström
2016. Left/right asymmetries and the grammar of pre- vs. post-positioning in German and Swedish talk-in-interaction. Language Sciences 56 ► pp. 68 ff.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, Uwe-A. Küttner & Chase Wesley Raymond
2021. Pivots revisited: Cesuring in action. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 613 ff.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Richard Ogden
2021. “Chunking” spoken language: Introducing weak cesuras. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 531 ff.
Günthner, Susanne
2015. A temporally oriented perspective on connectors in interactions. In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27], ► pp. 237 ff.
Haselow, Alexander
2016. A processual view on grammar: macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax. Language Sciences 54 ► pp. 77 ff.
Hopper, Paul J.
2011. Emergent Grammar and Temporality in Interactional Linguistics. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ► pp. 22 ff.
Imo, Wolfgang
2011. Online changes in syntactic gestalts in spoken German. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ► pp. 127 ff.
Imo, Wolfgang
2015. Interactional Construction Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 1:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Imo, Wolfgang
2015. Temporality and syntactic structure. In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27], ► pp. 147 ff.
Krekoski, Ross
2012. Clausal Continuations in Japanese. Discourse Processes 49:3-4 ► pp. 300 ff.
Krug, Maximilian
2022. Temporal procedures of mutual alignment and synchronization in collaborative meaning-making activities in a dance rehearsal. Frontiers in Communication 7
Luke, Kang-kwong
2012. Dislocation or Afterthought?—A Conversation Analytic Account of Incremental Sentences in Chinese. Discourse Processes 49:3-4 ► pp. 338 ff.
Luke, Kang-kwong, Sandra A. Thompson & Tsuyoshi Ono
2012. Turns and Increments: A Comparative Perspective. Discourse Processes 49:3-4 ► pp. 155 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2018. The on-line emergence of Hebrew insubordinateshe- (‘that/which/who’) clauses. Studies in Language 42:3 ► pp. 669 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2020. Chapter 4. The insubordinate – subordinate continuum. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 87 ff.
Oloff, Florence & Martin Havlík
2018. An initial description of syntactic extensions in spoken Czech. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 28:3 ► pp. 361 ff.
O’Grady, Gerard & Tom Bartlett
2019. Linearity and tone in the unfolding of information. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 51:2 ► pp. 192 ff.
Paul, Christine
Proske, Nadine & Arnulf Deppermann
2020. Chapter 10. Right-dislocated complement clauses in German talk-in-interaction. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 275 ff.
Rönnqvist, Sara & Jan Lindström
2021. Turn Continuations and Gesture: “And Then”-Prefacing in Multi-Party Conversations. Frontiers in Communication 6
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2020. Chapter 11. Relative-clause increments and the management of reference. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 303 ff.
Tudini, Vincenza
2015. Extending Prior Posts in Dyadic Online Text Chat. Discourse Processes 52:8 ► pp. 642 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. References. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ► pp. 741 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.