This paper extends the concept of local grammar to speech act studies, focusing specifically on apologising in English. It aims
primarily to demonstrate the usefulness of a local grammar approach to account for speech acts and ultimately to contribute to the
on-going development of corpus pragmatics. Apology expressions in a corpus of scripted TV conversations are first automatically
extracted and then manually examined in order to make sure that all remaining instances have the illocutionary force of
apologising and thus qualify for further analysis. The subsequent local grammar analyses facilitate the establishment of a local
grammar of apology, comprising 14 local grammar patterns. The analyses show that it is promising to develop a set of local
grammars to account more adequately for speech acts in general. The relationship between local grammars, functional grammars, and
general grammars is further discussed, which suggests that local grammars can be an alternative approach to functional-pragmatic
studies of language and discourse. Directions for future research are outlined; and implications and applications are briefly
1996Conversational Routines in English. London & New York: Longman.
Al-Gahtani, Saad, and Carsten Roever
2012 “Proficiency and Sequential Organization of L2 Requests.” Applied Linguistics 33 (1): 42–65.
1962How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michal Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306.
1995 “The Language of Definition.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
1995 “Parsing Cobuild Entries.” In The Language of Definition: The Formalization of Dictionary Definitions for Natural Language Processing, ed. by John Sinclair, Martin Hoelter, and Carol Peters, 13–58. Luxemburg: European Commission.
Charrow, Veda. R., Jo Ann Crandall, and Robert P. Charrow
1982 “Characteristics and Functions of Legal Language.” In Sublanguage: Studies of Language in Restricted Domains, ed. by Richard Kittredge, and John Lehrberger, 175–190. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
2010 “A Corpus-Based Approach to the Study of Speech Act of Thanking.” Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 36 (2): 257–274.
2003 “Apologising in British English.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Umeå University, Sweden.
Drew, Paul, Alexa Hepburn, Piera Margutti, and Renata Galatolo
(eds)2016 “Special Issue on Apologies in Discourse.” Discourse Processes 53 (1–2): 1–131.
Flöck, Ilka, and Ronald Geluykens
2015 “Speech Acts in Corpus Pragmatics: A Quantitative Contrastive Study of Directives in Spontaneous and Elicited Discourse.” In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics: Current Approaches to Discourse and Translation Studies, ed. by Jesús Romero-Trillo, 7–37. Heidelberg: Springer.
2015 “Speech Acts: A Synchronic Perspective.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook ed. by Karin Aijmer, and Christoph Rühlemann, 29–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geis, Michael L.
1995Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1971Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. London: Penguin.
1993 “Local Grammars and Their Representation by Finite Automata.” In Data, Description, Discourse: Papers on the English Language in Honour of John Sinclair, ed. by Michael Hoey, 26–38. London: HarperCollins.
Halliday, Michael A. K.
2006 “Afterwords.” In System and Corpus: Exploring Connections, ed. by Geoff Thompson, and Susan Hunston, 293–299. London: Equinox.
Halliday, Michael A. K.
2008Complementarities in Language. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian Matthiessen
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.
2013Lexical Analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
1968Mathematical Structures of Languages. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
1990 “Apologies in New Zealand English.” Language in Society 19 (2): 155–199.
2003 “Frame, Phrase or Function: A Comparison of Frame Semantics and Local Grammars.” In Corpus Linguistics 2003, ed. by Dawn Archer, Paul Rayson, Andrew Wilson, and Tony McEnery, 342–358. University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language, University of Lancaster, UK.
2011Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and Evaluative Language. London: Routledge.
Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson
(eds)2000Evaluation in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2017a “Oops, I didn’t Mean to Be So Flippant: A Corpus Pragmatic Analysis of Apologies in Blog Data.” Journal of Pragmatics 1161: 27–36.
Lutzky, Ursula, and Andrew Kehoe
2017b “I Apologise for My Poor Blogging: Searching for Apologies in the Birmingham Blog Corpus.” Corpus Pragmatics 1 (1): 37–56.
Martin, Jim, and Peter White
2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
2004 “Automatic Processing of Local Grammar Patterns.” In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Colloquium for the UK Special Interest Group for Computational Linguistics, ed. by Mark Lee, 166–171. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Hardie
2012Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2014 “Saying ‘Sorry’: Corporate Apologies Posted on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics 621: 30–45.
2001 “Changing Gender Roles in Popular Culture: Dialogue in Star Trek Episodes from 1966 to 1993.” In Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies, ed. by Susan Conrad, and Doug Biber, 138–155. London: Longman.
2011 “Corpus-Based Pragmatics II: Quantitative Studies.” In Foundations of Pragmatics, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, and Neal R. Norrick, 629–656. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Rühlemann, Christoph, and Karin Aijmer
2015 “Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer, and Christoph Rühlemann, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John R.
1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 51: 1–23.
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2004Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.
2010 “Defining the Definiendum.” In A Way with Words: Recent Advances in Lexical Theory and Analysis, ed. by Gilles-Maurice de Schryver, 37–47. Kampala: Menha Publishers.
1995Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2010 “Requests: A Sociopragmatic Approach.” In Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues, ed. by Alicia Martinez-Flor, and Esther Usó-Juan, 237–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2022. Julia Muschalik: Threatening in English: A mixed method approach. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
Su, Hang & Lei Zhang
2020. Local grammars and discourse acts in academic writing: A case study of exemplification in Linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 43 ► pp. 100805 ff.
Su, Hang, Yuqing Zhang & Xiaofei Lu
2021. Applying local grammars to the diachronic investigation of discourse acts in academic writing: The case of exemplification in Linguistics research articles. English for Specific Purposes 63 ► pp. 120 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.