Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 30:4 (2020) ► pp.557585
References
Aijmer, K.
2002English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L.
1983 “Ad hoc Categories.” Memory and Cognition 111: 211–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, L., Ghesquière, L. and Van de Velde, F.
eds. 2014Intersubjectivity and Inter-subjectification in Grammar and Discourse: Theoretical and Descriptive Advances. Vol. 651. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E.
1999Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L.
2006 “From usage to grammar: The mind’s Response to Repetition.” Language 82(4): 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L., Revere, P. and Pagliuca, W.
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Channell, J.
1994Vague language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J.
2007 “Discourse Variation, Grammaticalisation and Stuff like That.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(2): 155–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. and McCarthy, M.
2006Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide; Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Sprachen.Google Scholar
Cho, Y-M., Lee, H-S., Schulz, C., Sohn, H-M. and Sohn, S-O.
2012Integrated Korean: Intermediate 1. 2nd edition. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Dines, E. R.
1980 “Variation in Discourse – ‘and stuff like that’.” Language in Society 91: 13–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drake, A. V.
2015 “Indexing Uncertainty: The Case of Turn-final or .” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48(3): 301–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emanatian, M.
1992 “Chagga ‘come’ and ‘go’: Metaphor and the Development of Tense-Aspect.” Studies in Language 16(1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, B.
1995 “Grammaticalization in Progress: The Case of or something .” In Papers from the XVth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, ed. by Inger, M., Simonsen, HG. and Lødrup, H., 136–147. Oslo, Norway: Department of Linguistics, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Evans, N. and Watanabe, H.
eds. 2016Insubordination (Vol. 1151). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B.
2010 “Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging.” In New Approaches to Hedging, ed. by Kaltenböck, G., Mihatsch, W. and Schneider, S., 15–34. Emerald: Bingley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. and Traugott, E. C.
2003Grammaticalization. 2nd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itani, R.
1992 “Japanese Conjunction kedo ‘but’ in Utterance-final Use: A Relevance-based Analysis.” English Linguistics 91: 265–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G.
1990 “List Construction as a Task and Resource.” In Interaction Competence ed. by Psathas, G., 63–92. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Kim, M.
2015 “From Choice to Counter-expectation: Semantic-pragmatic Connections of the Korean Disjunctive, Concessive, and Scalar Focus Particle -na ,” Journal of Pragmatics 801: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “From Connective to Final Particle: Korean tunci “or” and Cross-Linguistic Comparisons,” Journal of Pragmatics 1351: 24–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, A.
1997Designing Social Actions: Grammar, Prosody, and Interaction in Swedish Conversation. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.Google Scholar
Mulder, J. and Thompson, S. A.
2008 “The Grammaticization of but as a Final Particle in English Conversation.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions. ed. by Laury, R. 179–204, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, M.
1999Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff like That: General Extenders in English Discourse, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Overstreet, M. and Yule, G.
1997 “On Being Inexplicit and Stuff in Contemporary American English,” Journal of English Linguistics 251: 250–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, E., Frader, J. and Bosk, C.
1982 “On Hedging in Physician-physician Discourse.” In Linguistics and the Professions. Proceedings of the Second Annual Delaware Symposium on Language Studies. ed. by Di Pietro, R. J., 83–97, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S.
1998 “Pejorative Connotation: A Case of Japanese.” In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, ed. by Jucker, A. H. and Ziv, Y. 261–276, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Expressivity of Vagueness: Alienation in the verb-tari suru Construction.” Japanese Language and Literature 42(1):157–169.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. and Denis, D.
2010 “The Stuff of Change: General Extenders in Toronto, Canada.” Journal of English Linguistics 38(4):335–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
2003 “From Subjectification to Intersubjectification.” In Motives for Language Change. ed. by Hickey, R. 124–139, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Revisiting Subjectification and Intersubjectification.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization. ed. by Davidse, K., Vandelanotte, L. and Cuyckens, H. 29–70, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2014 “Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery.” In Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse: Theoretical and Descriptive Advances (Vol. 65). ed. by Brems, L., Ghesquière, L. and Van de Velde, F., 7–28, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. and Dasher, R. B.
2005Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vaughan, E., McCarthy, M., and Clancy, B.
2017 “Vague Category Markers as Turn-final Items in Irish English.” World Englishes 36(2): 208–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeon, J. and Brown, L.
2011Korean: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar