Article published In:
PragmaticsVol. 30:4 (2020) ► pp.485–508
Confronting blackface
Stancetaking in the Dutch Black Pete debate
Recently, the Netherlands witnessed an agitated discussion over Black Pete, a blackface character associated with the Saint Nicholas festival. This paper analyzes a televised panel interview discussing a possible court ban of public Nicholas festivities, and demonstrates that participants not only disagree over the racist nature of the blackface character but also over the terms of the debate itself. Drawing on recent sociolinguistic work on stancetaking, it traces how panelists ‘laminate’ the interview’s participation framework by embedding their assessments of Black Pete in contrasting dialogical fields. Their stancetaking evokes opposing trajectories of earlier interactions and conjures up discursive complexes of identity/belonging that entail discrepant judgments over the acceptability of criticism. The extent to which a stance makes explicit the projected field’s phenomenal content, it is argued, reflects the relative (in)visibility of hegemonic we-ness.
Keywords: Black Pete, stance, metastancing, metapragmatic regimentation, panel interview, visibility, hegemony
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Stancetaking beyond the local
- 3.Negotiating constituency
- 4.Subsequent metastancing
- 5.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Angermuller, Johannes
2011 “From the Many Voices to the Subject Positions in Anti-Globalization Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2992–3000. 
Blakely, Allison
2001 Blacks in the Dutch World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Blommaert, Jan, and Jef Verscheuren
1998 Debating Diversity. London: Routledge.
Boer, Eugenie
2014 “Sint-Nicolaas, een levende legende.” In Sinterklaas verklaard, ed. by Willem Knoops, Madelon Pieper, and Eugenie Boer, 11–32. Amsterdam: SWP.
Brienen, Rebecca
2014 “Types and Stereotypes: Zwarte Piet and His Early Modern Sources.” In Dutch Racism, ed. by Philomena Essed and Isabel Hoving, 179–200. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Brighenti, Andrea
2007 “Visibility: A Category for the Social Sciences.” Current Sociology 55 (3): 323–342.
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
2002 The News Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clift, Rebecca
1999 “Irony in Conversation.” Language in Society 28 (4): 523–553.
Coupland, Justine, and Nikolas Coupland
2009 “Attributing Stance in Discourses of Body Shape and Weight Loss.” In Stance, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 227–249. New York: Oxford University Press.
Damari, Rebecca
2010 “Intertextual Stancetaking and the Local Negotiation of Cultural Identities by a Binational Couple.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 14 (5): 609–629.
De Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak
1999 “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse and Society 10 (2): 149–173.
Du Bois, John
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Edwards, Derek
2003 “Analyzing Racial Discourse: The Discursive Psychology of Mind-World Relationships.” In Analyzing Race Talk, ed. by Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 31–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Englebretson, Robert
Essed, Philomena
1997 “Racial Intimidation: Socio-political Implications of the Usage of racist Slurs.” In The Language and Politics of Exclusion, ed. by Stephen Riggins (ed.), 131–152. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Essed, Philomena, and Isabel Hoving
(eds.) 2014 Dutch Racism. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Goffman, Erving
1981 “Footing.” In: Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
Helsloot, John
2005 “De strijd om Zwarte Piet.” In Veranderingen van het alledaagse 1950–2000, ed. by Isabel Hoving, Hester Dibbits and Marlou Schrover, 398–402. Den Haag: Sdu.
2008 “De ambivalente boodschap van de eerste ‘Zwarte Piet’ (1850).” In De kleine Olympus, ed. by Eveline Doelman and John Helsloot, 94–117. Amsterdam: Knaw.
2012 “Zwarte Piet and Cultural Aphasia in the Netherlands.” Quotidian 3 (1): 1–20.
2014 “Is Zwarte Piet uit te leggen?” In Sinterklaas verklaard, ed. by Willem Knoops, Madelon Pieper, and Eugenie Boer, 77–85. Amsterdam: SWP.
Heritage, John
2012 “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52.
Hilhorst, Sacha, and Joke Hermes
2015 “ ‘We Have Given Up So Much’: Passion and Denial in the Dutch Zwarte Piet (Black Pete) Controversy.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 19 (3):218–233.
Irvine, Judith
1996 “Shadow Conversations: The Indeterminacy of Participant Roles.” In Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. by Michael Silverstein and Greg Urban, 131–159. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2009 “How Mr. Taylor Lost His Footing: Stance in a Colonial Encounter.” In Stance, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 53–71. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jaffe, Alexandra
(ed) 2009 Stance. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jaworski, Adam, and Crispin Thurlow
2009 “Taking an Elitist Stance.” In Stance, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 195–226. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jefferson, Gail
1990 “List Construction as a Task and Resource.” In Interaction Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 63–92. Washington: University Press of America.
Kiesling, Scott
2011 “Stance in Context: Affect, Alignment, and Investment in the Analysis of Stancetaking.” Presented at iMean Conference, 15 April 2011. UWE, Bristol.
Knoops, Willem, Madelon Pieper, and Eugenie Boer
(eds.) 2014 Sinterklaas verklaard. Amsterdam: SWP.
Kockelman, Paul
2004 “Stance and Subjectivity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14 (2): 127–150.
2012 “Review of Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), Stance.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 22 (2): E105–E108.
Lempert, Michael
2009 “On ‘flip-flopping’: Branded Stance-taking in U.S. Electoral Politics.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 131: 223–248.
Leudar, Ivan, and Jiří Nekvapil
1998 “On the Emergence of Political Identity in Czech Mass Media: The Case of the Democratic Party of Sudetenland.” Czech Sociological Review 61: 43–58.
Pijl, Yvon van der, and Karina Goulordava
2014 “Black Pete, “Smug Ignorance,” and the Value of the Black Body in Postcolonial Netherlands.” New West Indian Guide 88 (3/4): 262–291.
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by John Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rauniomaa, Mirka
2003 “Stance Accretion.” Unpublished manuscript, UCSB.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2005 Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.
Reyes, Angela
2011 “ ‘Racist!’ Metapragmatic Regimentation of Racist Discourse by Asian American Youth.” Discourse and Society 22 (4): 458–473.
Silverstein, Michael
1993 “Meta pragmatic discourse and meta pragmatic function.” In Reflexive Language, ed. by John Lucy, 33–58. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2003 “Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life.” Language and Communication 23 (3/4): 193–230.
Stockburger, Inge
2015 “Stancetaking and the Joint Construction of Zine Producer Identities in a Research Interview.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 19 (2): 22–240.
Vandergriff, Ilona
2012 “Taking a Stance on Stance: Metastancing as Legitimation.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 6 (1): 53–75.
Zienkowski, Jan
2017 “Re-articulating Critical Awareness about Racism in Public Discourse.” In Evaluation in Media Discourse, ed. by Ruth Breeze and Inés Olza, 227–265. Frankfurt: Lang.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
N. Silva, Daniel & Jacob L. Mey
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.