Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 30:4 (2020) ► pp. 485–508

Confronting blackface

Stancetaking in the Dutch Black Pete debate

| University of Jyväskylä
Recently, the Netherlands witnessed an agitated discussion over Black Pete, a blackface character associated with the Saint Nicholas festival. This paper analyzes a televised panel interview discussing a possible court ban of public Nicholas festivities, and demonstrates that participants not only disagree over the racist nature of the blackface character but also over the terms of the debate itself. Drawing on recent sociolinguistic work on stancetaking, it traces how panelists ‘laminate’ the interview’s participation framework by embedding their assessments of Black Pete in contrasting dialogical fields. Their stancetaking evokes opposing trajectories of earlier interactions and conjures up discursive complexes of identity/belonging that entail discrepant judgments over the acceptability of criticism. The extent to which a stance makes explicit the projected field’s phenomenal content, it is argued, reflects the relative (in)visibility of hegemonic we-ness.
Keywords: Black Pete, stance, metastancing, metapragmatic regimentation, panel interview, visibility, hegemony
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Stancetaking beyond the local
  • 3.Negotiating constituency
  • 4.Subsequent metastancing
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 22 November 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18039.dho
References
Angermuller, Johannes
2011 “From the Many Voices to the Subject Positions in Anti-Globalization Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2992–3000. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blakely, Allison
2001 Blacks in the Dutch World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Jef Verscheuren
1998 Debating Diversity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boer, Eugenie
2014 “Sint-Nicolaas, een levende legende.” In Sinterklaas verklaard, ed. by Willem Knoops, Madelon Pieper, and Eugenie Boer, 11–32. Amsterdam: SWP.Google Scholar
Brienen, Rebecca
2014 “Types and Stereotypes: Zwarte Piet and His Early Modern Sources.” In Dutch Racism, ed. by Philomena Essed and Isabel Hoving, 179–200. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brighenti, Andrea
2007 “Visibility: A Category for the Social Sciences.” Current Sociology 55 (3): 323–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
2002 The News Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
1999 “Irony in Conversation.” Language in Society 28 (4): 523–553. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Justine, and Nikolas Coupland
2009 “Attributing Stance in Discourses of Body Shape and Weight Loss.” In Stance, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 227–249. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damari, Rebecca
2010 “Intertextual Stancetaking and the Local Negotiation of Cultural Identities by a Binational Couple.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 14 (5): 609–629. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak
1999 “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse and Society 10 (2): 149–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Derek
2003 “Analyzing Racial Discourse: The Discursive Psychology of Mind-World Relationships.” In Analyzing Race Talk, ed. by Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 31–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
(ed.) 2007 Stancetaking in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Essed, Philomena
1997 “Racial Intimidation: Socio-political Implications of the Usage of racist Slurs.” In The Language and Politics of Exclusion, ed. by Stephen Riggins (ed.), 131–152. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Essed, Philomena, and Isabel Hoving
(eds.) 2014 Dutch Racism. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 “Footing.” In: Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Helsloot, John
2005 “De strijd om Zwarte Piet.” In Veranderingen van het alledaagse 1950–2000, ed. by Isabel Hoving, Hester Dibbits and Marlou Schrover, 398–402. Den Haag: Sdu.Google Scholar
2008 “De ambivalente boodschap van de eerste ‘Zwarte Piet’ (1850).” In De kleine Olympus, ed. by Eveline Doelman and John Helsloot, 94–117. Amsterdam: Knaw.Google Scholar
2012 “Zwarte Piet and Cultural Aphasia in the Netherlands.” Quotidian 3 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
2014 “Is Zwarte Piet uit te leggen?” In Sinterklaas verklaard, ed. by Willem Knoops, Madelon Pieper, and Eugenie Boer, 77–85. Amsterdam: SWP.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
2012 “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilhorst, Sacha, and Joke Hermes
2015 “ ‘We Have Given Up So Much’: Passion and Denial in the Dutch Zwarte Piet (Black Pete) Controversy.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 19 (3):218–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith
1996 “Shadow Conversations: The Indeterminacy of Participant Roles.” In Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. by Michael Silverstein and Greg Urban, 131–159. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2009 “How Mr. Taylor Lost His Footing: Stance in a Colonial Encounter.” In Stance, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 53–71. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra
(ed) 2009 Stance. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Crispin Thurlow
2009 “Taking an Elitist Stance.” In Stance, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 195–226. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1990 “List Construction as a Task and Resource.” In Interaction Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 63–92. Washington: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott
2011 “Stance in Context: Affect, Alignment, and Investment in the Analysis of Stancetaking.” Presented at iMean Conference, 15 April 2011. UWE, Bristol.
Knoops, Willem, Madelon Pieper, and Eugenie Boer
(eds.) 2014 Sinterklaas verklaard. Amsterdam: SWP.Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul
2004 “Stance and Subjectivity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14 (2): 127–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Review of Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), Stance.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 22 (2): E105–E108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, Michael
2009 “On ‘flip-flopping’: Branded Stance-taking in U.S. Electoral Politics.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 131: 223–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leudar, Ivan, and Jiří Nekvapil
1998 “On the Emergence of Political Identity in Czech Mass Media: The Case of the Democratic Party of Sudetenland.” Czech Sociological Review 61: 43–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pijl, Yvon van der, and Karina Goulordava
2014 “Black Pete, “Smug Ignorance,” and the Value of the Black Body in Postcolonial Netherlands.” New West Indian Guide 88 (3/4): 262–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by John Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rauniomaa, Mirka
2003 “Stance Accretion.” Unpublished manuscript, UCSB.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2005 Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Angela
2011 “ ‘Racist!’ Metapragmatic Regimentation of Racist Discourse by Asian American Youth.” Discourse and Society 22 (4): 458–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1993 “Meta pragmatic discourse and meta pragmatic function.” In Reflexive Language, ed. by John Lucy, 33–58. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life.” Language and Communication 23 (3/4): 193–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stockburger, Inge
2015 “Stancetaking and the Joint Construction of Zine Producer Identities in a Research Interview.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 19 (2): 22–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandergriff, Ilona
2012 “Taking a Stance on Stance: Metastancing as Legitimation.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 6 (1): 53–75.Google Scholar
Zienkowski, Jan
2017 “Re-articulating Critical Awareness about Racism in Public Discourse.” In Evaluation in Media Discourse, ed. by Ruth Breeze and Inés Olza, 227–265. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar

Full-text

Confronting blackface
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

N. Silva, Daniel & Jacob L. Mey
2021.  In The Pragmatics of Adaptability [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 319], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.