Stancetaking in the Dutch Black Pete debate
Recently, the Netherlands witnessed an agitated discussion over Black Pete, a blackface character associated with the Saint Nicholas festival. This paper analyzes a televised panel interview discussing a possible court ban of public Nicholas festivities, and demonstrates that participants not only disagree over the racist nature of the blackface character but also over the terms of the debate itself. Drawing on recent sociolinguistic work on stancetaking, it traces how panelists ‘laminate’ the interview’s participation framework by embedding their assessments of Black Pete in contrasting dialogical fields. Their stancetaking evokes opposing trajectories of earlier interactions and conjures up discursive complexes of identity/belonging that entail discrepant judgments over the acceptability of criticism. The extent to which a stance makes explicit the projected field’s phenomenal content, it is argued, reflects the relative (in)visibility of hegemonic we-ness.
Keywords: Black Pete, stance, metastancing, metapragmatic regimentation, panel interview, visibility, hegemony
- 2.Stancetaking beyond the local
- 3.Negotiating constituency
- 4.Subsequent metastancing
- 5.Concluding remarks
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 22 November 2019
Coupland, Justine, and Nikolas Coupland
De Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak
Du Bois, John
Hilhorst, Sacha, and Joke Hermes
Jaworski, Adam, and Crispin Thurlow
2011 “Stance in Context: Affect, Alignment, and Investment in the Analysis of Stancetaking.” Presented at iMean Conference, 15 April 2011. UWE, Bristol.
Leudar, Ivan, and Jiří Nekvapil
Pijl, Yvon van der, and Karina Goulordava
Cited by 1 other publications
N. Silva, Daniel & Jacob L. Mey
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.