Article published in:
Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence: Discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches
Edited by Caroline Gentens, María Sol Sansiñena, Stef Spronck and An Van linden
[Pragmatics 29:2] 2019
► pp. 277–301

Solega defenestration

Underspecified perspective shift in an unwritten Dravidian language

| University of Cologne
| University of Helsinki
Based on original fieldwork, this paper discusses reported speech and thought constructions in Solega (Dravidian). Following McGregor (1994) we claim that reported speech can only be comprehensively characterised if it is identified as a syntactic construction in its own right, a construction we label a framing construction. In natural discourse, elements of the framing construction, particularly clauses referring to the reporting event, may be left unexpressed. We term framing constructions without a matrix clause ‘defenestrated clauses’. While defenestrated clauses in Solega leave perspective shifts underspecified, they include several distinctive strategies that allow us to reconsider the role of morpho-syntactic marking in the expression of perspective shifts.
Keywords: reported speech, quotation, optional marking, Solega (Dravidian)
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Field site and methods
    • 2.1Solega speakers
    • 2.2Data
  • 3.Solega reported speech
    • 3.1Solega reported speech (RS) practices
    • 3.2The canonical RS construction and its variations
    • 3.3Un(der)specified reported speech
  • 4.Semantics of reported speech syntax
  • 5.Defenestration
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Glosses:
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 25 March 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18048.si
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008 “Semidirect Speech in Manambu.” Language Sciences 301: 383–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, Ann
1973 “Narrative Style and the Grammar Direct and Indirect Speech.” Foundations Language 10 (1): 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1982 Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Natalia L., Marcus Perlman, and Jean E. Fox Tree
2015 “Quotation as a Multimodal Construction.” Journal of Pragmatics 811: 1–7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
2016 “Depicting as a Method of Communication.” Psychological Review 123 (3): 324–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig
1990 “Quotations as Demonstrations.” Language 661: 764–805. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra
2015 “Quotation and Advances in Understanding Syntactic Systems.” Annual Review of Linguistics 1 (1): 43–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
2016 “Concluding Remarks: Why Viewpoint Matters.” In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen, 281–288. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, and Lieven Vandelanotte
2016 “Discourse Viewpoint Network.” In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen, 13–40. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckhardt, Regine
2012 “Particles as Speaker Indexicals in Free Indirect Discourse.” Linguistische Datenverarbeitung, ed. by Lotte Hogeweg and Eric McCready and Grégoire Winterstein, (35–36): 99–109.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2006 “A View with a View: Towards a Typology of Multiple Perspective Constructions.” In Proceedings of the thirty-first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Rebecca T. Cover and Yuni Kim, 93–120. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2007 “Insubordination and its uses.” In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, edited by Irina Nikolaeva, 366–431. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013 “Some Problems in the Typology of Quotation: A Canonical Approach.” In Canonical Morphology and Syntax, ed. by Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina, and Greville G. Corbett, 66–98. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1957 Shifters, Verbal Categories and the Russian verb. Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Lampert, Martina
2013 “Cognitive Semantics Goes Multimodal: Looking at Quot(ativ)es in Face-to-face-settings.” International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 4 (2): 103–132. http://​search​.proquest​.com​/docview​/1625137999​?accountid​=8330
Mathis, Terrie, and George Yule
1994 “Zero quotatives.” Discourse Processes 18 (1): 63–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William B.
1994 “The Grammar of Reported Speech and Thought in Gooniyandi.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 14 (1): 63–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2013 “Optionality in Grammar and Language Use.” Linguistics 51 (6): 1147–1204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Robert, Rainer Ludwig, Uli Sauerland, and David W. Fleck
2012 “Reported Speech in Matses: Perspective Persistence in Evidential Narratives.” International Journal of American Linguistics 78 (1): 41–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana
2012 “Personal Deixis in Reported Discourse: Towards a Typology of Person Alignment.” Linguistic Typology 16 (2): 233–263.Google Scholar
Recanati, François
2001 “Open Quotation.” Mind 110 (439): 637–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roeck, Marijke De
1994 “A Functional Typology of Speech Reports.” In Function and Expression in Universal Grammar, ed. by E. Engberg-Pedersen, L. Jakobson, and S. Rasmussen, 331–351. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Sharvit, Yael
2008 “The Puzzle of Free Indirect Discourse.” Linguistics & Philosophy 311: 353–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Si, Aung
2016 The Traditional Ecological Knowledge of the Solega: A Linguistic Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sotirova, Violeta
2004 “Connectives in Free Indirect Style: Continuity or Shift?” Language Literature 13 (3): 216–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spronck, Stef
2012 “Minds Divided: Speaker Attitudes in Quotatives.” In Quotatives: Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller and Ingrid Van Alphen, 71–116. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Stance as Participant Structure: A Jakobsonian Approach to the Pragmatics and Semantics of Evidentiality.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 291: 193–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Defenestration: Deconstructing the Frame-In Relation in Ungarinyin.” Journal of Pragmatics 1141: 104–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spronck, Stef, and Tatiana Nikitina
2019 “Reported Speech Constructions Are a Dedicated Syntactic Domain: Typological Arguments and Observations.” LinguisticTypology 23: 1. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stec, Kashmiri, Mike Huiskes, and Gisela Redeker
2015 “A Multimodal Analysis of Quotation in Oral Narratives.” OpenLinguistics 11: 531–554.Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2004 “Deixis and Grounding in Speech and Thought Representation.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (3): 489–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Speech and Thought Representation in English: A Cognitive-Functional Approach. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2011 “The Functions of Represented Speech and Thought in Umpithamu Narratives.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 31 (4): 491–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vološinov, Valentin N.
1973 Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Ed. by Ladislav Matejka and I. R. Titunik. New York/London: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Solega defenestration