Article published in:Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence: Discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches
Edited by Caroline Gentens, María Sol Sansiñena, Stef Spronck and An Van linden
[Pragmatics 29:2] 2019
► pp. 198–225
Recursive embedding of viewpoints, irregularity, and the role for a flexible framework
This paper discusses several conventional perspective operators at the lexical, grammatical, and narrative levels. When combined with each other and with particular contexts, these operators can amount to unexpected viewpoints arrangements. Traditional conceptualisations in terms of viewpoint embedding and the regular shifting from one viewpoint to the other are argued to be insufficient for describing these arrangements in all their nuances and details.We present an analysis of three cases in which viewpoints of speaker, addressee, and third parties are mutually coordinated: (i) global and local perspective structure in Nabokov’s novel Lolita, (ii) postposed reporting constructions in Dutch, and (iii) the Russian apprehensive construction, which has a seemingly redundant negation marker in the subordinate clause. For each of these three cases, we discuss how traditional conceptualisations fall short. We discuss an alternative model of viewpoint construction which allows for the conceptual juxtaposition and mixing of different and simultaneously activated viewpoints.
Keywords: viewpoint embedding, recursive embedding, speech and thought representation, Nabokov, apprehensive construction
- 1.Introduction and background
- 2.Coordinating perspectives
- 2.1A three-dimensional conceptual model
- 2.2Viewpoint embedding: Communicative and cognitive aspects
- 3.A literary case: Nabokov’s Lolita
- 3.1The thoughtscape
- 3.2Conventional patterns, unpredictable viewpoint structure
- 4.Multiple perspectives in grammar
- 4.1Citation and inquit constructions in Dutch
- 4.2The Russian apprehensive construction
- 5.Conclusion: The role for a flexible framework
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 26 March 2019
2017 “The Russian Apprehensive Construction: Syntactic Status Reassessed, Negation Vindicated”. MA Thesis Leiden University. [https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/46284]
Boye, K. and P. Harder
Budelmann, F. and P. Easterling
Corballis, M. C.
Dancygier, B. and E. Sweetser
Dancygier, B., W. Lu, and A. Verhagen
Du Bois, John W.
Duijn, M. J. van
Duijn, M. J. van, I. Sluiter, and A. Verhagen
Duijn, M. J. van and A. Verhagen
In press. “Beyond Triadic Communication: a Three-dimensional Conceptual Space for Modeling Intersubjectivity”. Pragmatics & Cognition.
Dunbar, R. I. M.
Horn, L. R.
Langacker, R. W.
Launay, J., E. Pearce, R. Wlodarski, M. J. van Duijn, J. Carney, and R. I. M. Dunbar
Leech, G., and M. Short
Newmeyer, F. J.
Nilsson, N. Z.
Premack, D. G., and G. Woodruff
Scott-Phillips, T. C.
Shultz, S. and R. I. M. Dunbar
Turner, M., and G. Fauconnier
Yoshida, W., B. Seymour, K. J. Friston, and R. J. Dolan
Cited by 3 other publications
de Vries, Clarissa, Bert Oben & Geert Brône
Duijn, Max van & Arie Verhagen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.