Introduction published in:
Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence: Discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches
Edited by Caroline Gentens, María Sol Sansiñena, Stef Spronck and An Van linden
[Pragmatics 29:2] 2019
► pp. 155–169
Introduction

Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence, discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches

| University of Leuven | University of Stockholm
| University of Leuven
| University of Helsinki
| University of Liège | University of Leuven
In this introduction, we set out the central themes of the special issue. It concentrates on imperfect function-form mappings, and discusses several cases in which specific perspectival meanings are not fully predictable on the basis of a perspectivizing grammatical construction alone. We distinguish two kinds of form-function mismatches: (1) perspective-persistent phenomena, i.e. grammatically signaled deictic and/or cognitive perspective shifts which are not realized in interpretation, and (2) irregular perspective shifts, which involve either grammatically un(der)specified shifts or grammatically signaled shifts that are interpreted as mixing multiple sources of deictic and/or cognitive perspective (‘multiple-perspective constructions’). We briefly discuss and contextualize each of the contributions, and highlight their central findings.
Keywords: perspective persistence, irregular perspective shifts, form-function mismatch, grammatical underspecification, multiple-perspective construction
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 24 April 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18050.gen
References
Adelaar, Willem F. H.
1990 “The Role of Quotations in Andean Discourse.” In Unity in Diversity: Papers Presented to Simon C. Dik on His 50th Birthday, ed. by Harm Pinkster, and Inge Genee, 1–12. Dordrecht and Providence, RI: Foris publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, Ann
1982 Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert, and Barbara De Cock
(eds) 2015 Hearer-Orientation in Spoken Genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik, and Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2006 “Coming to Terms with Subjectivity.” Cognitive Linguistics 171: 365–392.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, Wei-Lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen
2016 Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning. Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nick
2006 “View with a View: Towards a Typology of Multiple Perspective Constructions.” In Proceedings of the Thirty-first Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Rebecca T. Cover, and Yuni Kim, 93–120. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Evans, Nick, Henrik Bergqvist, and Lila San Roque
2018 “The Grammar of Engagement I: Framework and Initial Exemplification.” Language and Cognition 10 (1): 110–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel
2008 “Wari’ Intentional State Constructions.” In Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface, ed. by Robert D. van Valin, 381–409. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentens, Caroline
2016 “The Factive-Reported Distinction in English. Representational and Interpersonal Semantics.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Gentens, Caroline, and Kristin Davidse
2017 “Reconceptualizing Factivity: a New View on the Semantics of Factive Constructions.” Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics 35 (6): 65–95.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke, Lot Brems, and Freek van de Velde
(eds) 2014 Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom
2008 Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hinterwimmer, Stefan, and Petra B. Schumacher
(eds) 2017 Special Issue on Perspective Taking. Glossa (2) 1.Google Scholar
Konnerth, Linda
2016 “Speech-act Participant Perspectives in Quotative Constructions of Monsang.” Paper presented at SLE49, University of Naples, 31 August – 3 September 2016.
Subm. “Recycling through Perspective Persistence in Monsang (Trans-Himalayan): Reconstructing the Desiderative from a Reported Intentionality Construction.” Functions of Language.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
2006 “Deixis.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory L. Ward, 97–120. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William B.
1994 “The Grammar of Reported Speech and Thought in Gooniyandi.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 14 (1): 63–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “A Desiderative Complement Construction in Warrwa.” In Language Description, History and Development: Linguistic Indulgence in Memory of Terry Crowley, ed. by Jeff Siegel, John Lynch, and Diana Eades, 27–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Robert, Rainer Ludwig, Uli Sauerland, and David W. Fleck
2012 “Reported Speech in Matses: Perspective Persistence and Evidential Narratives.” International Journal of American Linguistics 78 (1): 41–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey
1993 “Indexicality and Deixis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 161:1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pascual, Esther
2014 Fictive Interaction: The Conversation Frame in Thought, Language, and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1975 “Whose Main Clause? Point of View in Sentences with Parentheticals.” In Harvard Studies of Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 1, ed. by Susumu Kuno, 127–171. Cambridge, MA: Dept. of Linguistics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Rumsey, Alan
2001 “On the Syntax and Semantics of Trying.” In Forty Years on: Ken Hale and Australian Languages, ed. by Jane Simpson, David Nash, Mary Laughren, Peter Austin, and Barry Alpher, 353–63. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila, and Henrik Bergqvist
(eds) 2015 Special Issue on Epistemic Marking in Typological Perspective. STUF – Language Typology and Universals.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Floyd, Simeon, and Elisabeth Norcliffe
2017 “Evidentiality and Interrogativity.” Lingua 186–1871: 120–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 “Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Keith H. Basso, and Henry A. Selby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Spronck, Stef
2012 “Minds Divided, Speaker Attitudes in Quotatives.” In Quotatives: Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller, and Ingrid van Alphen, 71–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Reported Speech in Ungarinyin: Grammar and Social Cognition in a Language of the Kimberley Region, Western Australia.” Ph.D. dissertation, Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
2017 “Defenestration: Deconstructing the Frame-in Relation in Ungarinyin.” Journal of Pragmatics 1141: 104–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spronck, Stef, An Van linden, Caroline Gentens, and Maria S. Sansiñena
eds. Subm. Notes from the Field on Perspective-Indexing Constructions: Irregular Shifts and Perspective Persistence Functions of Language
Steever, Sanford B.
2002 “Direct and Indirect Discourse in Tamil.” In Reported Discourse: A Meeting Ground for Different Linguistic Domains, ed. by Tom Güldemann, and Manfred von Roncador, 91–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2004a “From Representational to Scopal Distancing Indirect Speech or Thought: A Cline of Subjectification.” Text 24 (4): 547–585. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004b “Deixis and Grounding in Speech and Thought Representation.” Journal of Pragmatics 361: 489–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Speech and Thought Representation in English. A Cognitive-Functional Perspective. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanparys, Johan
1996 Categories and Complements of Illocutionary Verbs in a Cognitive Perspective. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2005 Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007 Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy. Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “The Status of Purpose, Reason and Intended Endpoint in the Typology of Complex Sentences: Implications for Layered Models of Clause Structure.” Linguistics 461: 757–788. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Roncador, Manfred
1980 “Gibt die Redewiedergabe Rede wieder?” L.A.U.T. (Linguistic Agency University of Trier), Series A: Paper no. 71.Google Scholar
1988 Zwischen direkter und indirekter Rede: Nichtwörtliche direkte Rede, erlebte Rede, logophorische Konstruktionen und Verwandtes. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Full-text

Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence, discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Konnerth, Linda
2020. Recycling through perspective persistence in Monsang (Trans-Himalayan). Functions of Language 27:1 ► pp. 55 ff. Crossref logo
Nikitina, Tatiana
2020. Logophoricity and shifts of perspective. Functions of Language 27:1 ► pp. 78 ff. Crossref logo
Spronck, Stef & Daniela Casartelli
2021. In a Manner of Speaking: How Reported Speech May Have Shaped Grammar. Frontiers in Communication 6 Crossref logo
Spronck, Stef, An Van linden, Caroline Gentens & María Sol Sansiñena
2020. Perspective persistence and irregular perspective shift. Functions of Language 27:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Su, Danjie
2021. Factuality lens. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal Crossref logo
Van linden, An
2020. Constructional effects of indirect evidential marking in Harakmbut. Functions of Language 27:1 ► pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
Verschueren, Jef
2019. Indexical ‘mismatch’; or, adaptability at work. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 29:2 ► pp. 302 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.