In this introduction, we set out the central themes of the
special issue. It concentrates on imperfect function-form mappings, and
discusses several cases in which specific perspectival meanings are not fully
predictable on the basis of a perspectivizing grammatical construction alone. We
distinguish two kinds of form-function mismatches: (1) perspective-persistent
phenomena, i.e. grammatically signaled deictic and/or cognitive perspective
shifts which are not realized in interpretation, and (2) irregular perspective
shifts, which involve either grammatically un(der)specified shifts or
grammatically signaled shifts that are interpreted as mixing multiple sources of
deictic and/or cognitive perspective (‘multiple-perspective constructions’). We
briefly discuss and contextualize each of the contributions, and highlight their
1990 “The Role of Quotations in Andean Discourse.” In Unity in Diversity: Papers Presented to Simon C. Dik on His 50th Birthday, ed. by Harm Pinkster, and Inge Genee, 1–12. Dordrecht and Providence, RI: Foris publications.
1982Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Cornillie, Bert, and Barbara De Cock
(eds)2015Hearer-Orientation in Spoken Genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
De Smet, Hendrik, and Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2006 “Coming to Terms with Subjectivity.” Cognitive Linguistics 171: 365–392.
Dancygier, Barbara, Wei-Lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen
2016Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning. Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities. Berlin: Mouton.
2006 “View with a View: Towards a Typology of Multiple Perspective Constructions.” In Proceedings of the Thirty-first Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Rebecca T. Cover, and Yuni Kim, 93–120. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Evans, Nick, Henrik Bergqvist, and Lila San Roque
2018 “The Grammar of Engagement I: Framework and Initial Exemplification.” Language and Cognition 10 (1): 110–140.
1975 “Whose Main Clause? Point of View in Sentences with Parentheticals.” In Harvard Studies of Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 1, ed. by Susumu Kuno, 127–171. Cambridge, MA: Dept. of Linguistics, Harvard University.
2001 “On the Syntax and Semantics of Trying.” In Forty Years on: Ken Hale and Australian Languages, ed. by Jane Simpson, David Nash, Mary Laughren, Peter Austin, and Barry Alpher, 353–63. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
San Roque, Lila, and Henrik Bergqvist
(eds)2015Special Issue on Epistemic Marking in Typological Perspective. STUF – Language Typology and Universals.
San Roque, Lila, Floyd, Simeon, and Elisabeth Norcliffe
2017 “Evidentiality and Interrogativity.” Lingua 186–1871: 120–143.
1976 “Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Keith H. Basso, and Henry A. Selby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
2015 “Reported Speech in Ungarinyin: Grammar and Social Cognition in a Language of the Kimberley Region, Western Australia.” Ph.D. dissertation, Canberra: Australian National University.
2017 “Defenestration: Deconstructing the Frame-in Relation in Ungarinyin.” Journal of Pragmatics 1141: 104–133.
Spronck, Stef, An Van linden, Caroline Gentens, and Maria S. Sansiñena
eds. Subm. Notes from the Field on Perspective-Indexing Constructions: Irregular Shifts and Perspective PersistenceFunctions of Language
Steever, Sanford B.
2002 “Direct and Indirect Discourse in Tamil.” In Reported Discourse: A Meeting Ground for Different Linguistic Domains, ed. by Tom Güldemann, and Manfred von Roncador, 91–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2004a “From Representational to Scopal Distancing Indirect Speech or Thought: A Cline of Subjectification.” Text 24 (4): 547–585.
2004b “Deixis and Grounding in Speech and Thought Representation.” Journal of Pragmatics 361: 489–520.
2009Speech and Thought Representation in English. A Cognitive-Functional Perspective. Berlin: Mouton.
1996Categories and Complements of Illocutionary Verbs in a Cognitive Perspective. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
2005Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy. Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton.
2008 “The Status of Purpose, Reason and Intended Endpoint in the Typology of Complex Sentences: Implications for Layered Models of Clause Structure.” Linguistics 461: 757–788.
von Roncador, Manfred
1980 “Gibt die Redewiedergabe Rede wieder?” L.A.U.T. (Linguistic Agency University of Trier), Series A: Paper no. 71.
von Roncador, Manfred
1988Zwischen direkter und indirekter Rede: Nichtwörtliche direkte Rede, erlebte Rede, logophorische Konstruktionen und Verwandtes. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.