Mutual understanding mechanism in verbal exchanges between carers and multiply-disabled young people
An interaction structure analysis
The present article describes a study in which conversation analysis was used to investigate the verbal interactions between carers and profoundly multiply disabled young people. We examine the cognitive processes that come into play in conversations, and describe and analyze the interactional effects of pathologies on the cognitive processes involved in comprehension. We identify the rationality and reasoning processes to which the disabled person is susceptible, that is to say, that person’s cognitive efficiency, and the communication strategies employed by the “normal” interlocutor.
The corpus, which was gathered at a specialist institute in France, consists of video recordings of interactions between a multiply disabled young person and one or more carers. In total, thirteen conversations involving six different young people were recorded. Analysis of the characteristics of the conversational exchanges revealed that conversational exchanges are based on two very precise modes of interaction that foster the mutual understanding process.
Learning outcomes: These two modes of interaction represent exchange structures that favor the emergence of mutual understanding and that reveal the multiply disabled person’s cognitive efficiency in the conversation. We highlight the role of repetition as a conversation repair and we discuss the relationship between the carer and the disabled person.
Keywords: Conversational pragmatic analysis, Mutual understanding, Disability, Repetition, Intersubject dynamics
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 June 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.2.01boc
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.2.01boc
References
Antaki, C., N. Young, and M. Finlay
Antaki, C., W.M.L. Finlay, E. Sheridan, T. Jingree, and C. Walton
Antaki, C., W.M.L. Finlay, and C. Walton
Jingree, T., W.M.L. Finlay, and C. Antaki
Brinton, B., and M. Fujiki
Chouinard, M.M., and E.V. Clark
(2003) Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of child language 301: 637-669.
BoP
Clark, Herbert H
Clark, H.H., and T. Wasow
Curl, T.S., J. Local, and G. Walker
Dowling, Maura
Edwards, Derek
Goodwin, C., M.H. Goodwin, and D. Olsher
(2002) Producing sense with nonsense syllables: Turn and sequence in the conversations of a man with severe aphasia. In B. Fox, C. Ford & S. Thompson (eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 56-80. BoP
Goodwin, Charles
Keith, E.N., J. Welsh, S.M. Camarata, L. Butkovsky, and M. Camarata
Lacroix A, J. Bernicot, and J. Reilly
Musiol, M., and M. Rebuschi
in press) Towards a two-step formalisation of verbal interaction in schizophrenia: A case study. In A. Trognon, M. Batt, J. Kaelen, & D. Vernant (eds.) Dialog’s logical properties Nancy P.U.N
Musiol, M., and A. Trognon
Pellegrini, A.D., G.H. Brody, and I.E. Siegel
Perkins, L
Perkins, Michael R
(1998) Is pragmatics epiphenomenal? Evidence from communication disorders. Journal of Pragmatics 291: 291-311.
BoP
Perrin, L., D. Deshaies, and C. Paradis
(2003) Pragmatic functions of local diaphonic repetition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1843-1860.
BoP
Rieger, Caroline
Roulet, E., A. Auchlin, J. Moeschler, C. Rubattel, and M. Schelling
Schegloff, E.A., G. Jefferson, and H. Sachs
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 531: 361-382.
BoP
Searle, John R
(1969/1995) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. BoP 

Searle, J.R., and D. Vanderveken
Sperber, Dan
Trognon, Alain
Vanderveken, D., and K. Susumo
Vigil, D.C., J. Hodges, and T. Kle
Full-text
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Bocéréan, Christine, Emmanuelle Canut & Michel Musiol
Robles, Jessica S.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.