Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 30:3 (2020) ► pp.431–457

Bonding across Chinese social media

The pragmatics of language play in “精 (sang) 彩 (xin) 有 (bing) 趣 (kuang)” construction

| Zhejiang International Studies University
| Fujian Normal University | Nanjing Xiaozhuang University
| University of Alicante
This paper explores social bonding in language play via the construction of ‘Chinese character (annotation)’ on two major social media platforms (Sina Weibo and WeChat) in China. The Chinese characters and their bracketed annotations under study, despite their one-to-one matching in sequence, never match each other either in meaning or in pronunciation. They convey a sense of playfulness among social media users who may be acquaintances or strangers to each other. While research on language play has uncovered systematic interpersonal meanings and social functions, our analysis of screen-based and user-based data shows that such linguistic behavior in a virtual community of practice contributes to social bonding among social media players. Within such structure and with different substitutes for both characters and annotations, social media users frame their expressions in evaluative or emotive ways to facilitate their presentation of an alternative self and of individual or community values.
Keywords: Chinese social media, social bonding, language play, pinyin , virtual community of practice, frames, identity, self, values
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
  • 3.Data compilation
    • 3.1The collection of screen-based data
    • 3.2The user-based data
  • 4.The character (annotation) construction: Interpretation on screen-based data
    • 4.1Neutral-Neutral pattern
    • 4.2Positive-Positive pattern
    • 4.3Negative-Positive pattern
    • 4.4Neutral-Negative pattern
    • 4.5Dialect perception orientation
  • 5.Who is talking to whom: User-based data analysis
    • 5.1Findings from Phase 1
    • 5.2Findings from Phase 2
  • 6.Discussion and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 24 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19010.xie
References (58)
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2013. “Online Data Collection.” In Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Applications, ed. by Christine Mallinson, Becky Childs, and Gerard Van Herk, 236–249. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Languaging When Contexts Collapse: Audience Design in Social Networking.” Discourse, Context & Media 451: 62–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Negotiating Authenticities in Mediatized Times.” Discourse, Context & Media 81: 74–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anis, Jacques. 2007. “Neography: Unconventional Spelling in French SMS Text Messages.” In The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 87–115. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arndt, Horst and Richard W. Janney. 1985. “Improving Emotive Communication: Verbal, Prosodic and Kinesics Conflict Avoidance Techniques.” Per Linguam 11:21–30.Google Scholar
Arndt, Horst, and Richard W. Janney. 1987. InterGrammar: Towards an Integrative Model of Verbal, Prosodic and Kinesic Choices in Speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. “Verbal, Prosodic, and Kinesic Emotive Contrasts in Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 151: 521–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Nancy (ed.). 2017. Multiple Perspectives on Language Play. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Coulson, S. 2001. Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2017. “Participation as Audience Design.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 61–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Martal, and Fabio I. M. Poppi. 2019. “Risum teneatis, amici?: The Socio-Pragmatics of RoastMe Humor.” Journal of Pragmatics 1391: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1985. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quaderni di Semantica 6(2): 222–254.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2017. “‘Whose Context Collapse?’: Ethical Clashes in the Study of Language and Social Media in Context.” Applied Linguistics Review 8(2–3): 169–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgalou, Mariza. 2017. Discourse and Identity on Facebook: How We Use Language and Multimodal Texts to Present Identity Online. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Sage Lambert. 2018. “Impoliteness and the Moral Order in Online Gaming.” Internet Pragmatics 1(2): 303–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Helmut. 2019a. “Are Austrian Presidential Candidates Ordinary People? Candidates’ Self-Presentation Strategies on Twitter during the 2016 Austrian Presidential Election Campaign.” In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Elda Weizman, 21–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2017. “Teasing.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. by Salvartore Attardo, 204–218. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 2004. “Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior.” In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, ed. by Sasha A. Barab, Rob Kling, and James H. Gray, 338–376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C., and Astsa Zelenkauskaite. 2009. “Symbolic Capital in a Virtual Heterosexual Market: Abbreviation and Insertion in Italian iTV SMS.” Written Communication 26(1): 5–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Bernie. 2010. “The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online.” Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 301: 377–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rodney H. 2015. “Discourse, Cybernetics, and the Entextualisation of the Self.” In Discourse and Digital Practices: Doing Discourse Analysis in the Digital Age, ed. by Rodney H. Jones, Alice Chik, and Christoph A. Hafner, 28–47. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Juliane House. 2020. “Ritual Frames: A Contrastive Pragmatic Approach.” Pragmatics 30(1): 142–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara, and Sherzer, Joel. 1976. “Introduction.” In Speech Play: Research and Resources for Studying Linguistic Creativity, ed. by Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, 1–16. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knospe, Sebastian, Alexander Onysko, and Maik Goth (eds.). 2016. Crossing Languages to Play with Words: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Carmen. 2007. “Linguistic Features of Email and ICQ Instant Messaging in Hong Kong.” In The Multilingual Internet. Language, Culture and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 184–208. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Language Choice and Self-presentation in Social Media: The Case of University Students in Hong Kong.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 91–111. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Litt, Eden. 2012. “Knock, Knock. Who’s There? The Imagined Audience.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56(3): 330–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madianou, Mirca, and Daniel Miller. 2012. Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maíz Arévalo, Carmen. 2017. “Getting ‘Liked’.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian. R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 575–606. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Alice E., and Danah boyd. 2010. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Con text Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 131: 96–113.Google Scholar
Nishimura, Yukiko. 2016. “Style, Creativity and Play.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 103–116. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 2004. “Humor, Tellability and Conarration in Conversation.” Text 241: 79–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
North, Sarah. 2007. “‘The Voices, the Voices’: Creativity in Online Conversation.” Applied Linguistics 28(4): 538–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth. 2018. Narrative Online: Shared Stories in Social Media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth, David Barton, Johann W. Unger, and Michele Zappavigna. 2014. Researching Language and Social Media. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, Yuling, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg (eds.). 2014. The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Su, His-Yao. 2007. “The Mutilingual and Multiorthographic Taiwan-Based Internet: Creative Uses of Writing Systems on College-affiliated BBSs.” In The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 64–86. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagg, Caroline, and Philip Seargeant. 2014. “Audience Design and Language Choice in the Construction and Maintenance of Translocal Communities on Social Network Sites.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 161–185. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah, and Cynthia Wallat. 1993. “Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination in Interview.” In Framing in Discourse, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 57–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2001. “Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-Based Approach.” PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge. Available online at: [URL] (accessed 3 March 2016).
Thaler, Verena. 2016. “Varieties of Wordplay.” In Crossing Languages to Play with Words: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Sebastian Knospe, Alexander Onysko, and Maik Goth. 47–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin. 2012. “Determined Creativity: Language Play in New Media.” In Discourse and Creativity, ed. by Rodney Jones, 169–190. Harkow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Toma, Catalina L., and Cassandra L. Carlson. 2015. “How Do Facebook Users Believe They Come across in Their Profiles?: A Meta-Perception Approach to Investigating Facebook Self-Presentation.” Communication Research Reports 32(1): 93–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Utz, Sonja. 2015. “The Function of Self-Disclosure on Social Network Sites; Not Only Intimate, but also Positive and Entertaining Self-Disclosure Increase the Feelings of Connection.” Computers in Human Behavior 451: 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wesch, Mike. 2008. “Context Collapse.” [URL] (accessed 20 June 2016).
Yus, Francisco. 2011. Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2011. “Ambient Affiliation: A Linguistic Perspective on Twitter.” New Media Society 13(5): 788–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “CoffeeTweets: Bonding around the Been on Twitter.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by. Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 139–160. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Searchable Talk: Hashtags and Social Media Metadiscourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ziem, Alexander. 2014. Frames of Understanding in Text and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Zhang, Yi, Luoxiangyu Zhang, Wei Ren & Yuanbo Liu
2024. “(scream)(wriggle)(dismally crawl)” – parentheses as semiotic resources for translanguaging and trans-semiotic practices on Chinese micro-blogging. Social Semiotics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mu, Junfang, Lixin Zhang & Yuyang Chen
2023. An investigation of the formation and pragmatic strategies of “xx-zi”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo
Hsiao, Chi-hua
2022. Celebrification and viewer interaction in microcelebrities’ product promotion videos. East Asian Pragmatics 7:3 ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Lin, Minfen & Doreen D. Wu
2022. Rapport building by Chinese celebrities on Weibo and Facebook. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 13:1 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Song, Yang & Yuhan Feng
2022. Doing participatory fandom through trans‑scripting. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 13:1 ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Zappavigna, Michele & Shoshana Dreyfus
2022. “In these pandemic times”: The role of temporal meanings in ambient affiliation about COVID-19 on Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media 47 ► pp. 100595 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun & Ying Tong
2021. Chapter 7. Inviting a purchase. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun
2020. Internet memes we live by (and die by). Internet Pragmatics 3:2 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun
2022. Internet memes we live by (and die by). In The Pragmatics of Internet Memes [Benjamins Current Topics, 120], ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.