Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 30:3 (2020) ► pp. 351380
References
Ahn, Mikyung
2016 “Emotion in Interaction: A Diachronic and Pragmatic Analysis of the Sentence-Final Particle -Tani in Korean.” Studies in Language 40(4): 872–893. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2016 “Sentence Types.” In The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood, ed. by Ian Nuyts and Johan van der Auwera, 141–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ammann, Andreas, and Johan van der Auwera
2001 “Complementizer-Headed Main Clauses for Volitional Moods in the Languages of South-Eastern Europe: A Balkanism?” In Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 67, ed. by Olga Mišeka Tomić, 341–362. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doh, Jae Hak
2016 “On the Strategies and Grammatical Categories that Denote a Concept of ‘Wish’ in Korean.” Emwunnoncip 781: 361–390.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Cumming, Susanna, and Paolino Dane
1993 “Outline of Discourse Transcription.” In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. by Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert, 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jeon, Byung-yong
1999Cwungseykwukeuy Emi -Niey Tayhan Yenkwu [A Study on the Ending -Ni in Middle Korean]. Seoul: Cheongtongkewul.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-cheol
2008 “A Study on the Discourse Function of ‘JA’ to Discourse Marker in Korean language.” Kwukemwunhak 451: 5–23.Google Scholar
Koo, Hyun Jung and Seongha Rhee
2008 “Manipulated Hypotheticality in Conditionals: A Journey in Search of Strength and Diversity.” Paper presented at the 4th New Reflections on Grammaticalization Conference, Catholic University of Leuven, July 16–19, 2008.
Lim, Dong-Hoon
2011 “Sentence Types and Uses in Korean.” Journal of Korea Linguistics 601: 323–359.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina, and Andrea Sansò
2011 “How Directive Constructions Emerge: Grammaticalization, Constructionalization, Cooptation.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3489–3521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Na, Eun-mee
2002 “The Function of the Korean Utterance-Final Marker ‘-Psita’ with Focus on its Directive Function.” Icwungenehak 201: 93–110.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R.
2001Mood and Modality (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, Sook-young
2012 “Studies on Behaviors Accompanied by Hortative Utterances: A Case Study of ‘-(U)psita, -Ca’.” Paper presented at the 16th Fall Korean Language Culture Education Conference. Yonsei University, Seoul, October 20.
Rhee, Seongha
2016 “From Quoting to Reporting to Stance-Marking: Rhetorical Strategies and Intersubjectification of Reportative.” Language Sciences 551: 36–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “What Happens When the Will Withers: The Case of Hortative in Korean.” Lingua 189–1901: 51.Google Scholar
. (To appear). “Pseudo-Hortative and the Development of the Discourse Marker Eti Poca ‘Well, Let’s See’ in Korean.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21(1) (2020) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min
1999The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C., and Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan, Nina Dobrushina, and Valentin Goussev
In press. “A Semantic Map for Imperative-Hortatives.” In Points of Comparison in Linguistics: from Morphology to Discourse ed. by Dominique Willems, Timothy Colleman and Bart Defrancq 1 20 Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan
2003 “Imperative-Hortative systems.” In World Atlas of Language Structures, ed. by Matthew Dryer, Martin Haspelmath, David Gil, and Bernard Comrie, 294–297. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Full-text

The Korean hortative construction revisited
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kim, Ahrim & Iksoo Kwon
2020. Hortatives, imperatives, and the directive speech-act continuum: A usage-based approach to the Korean -ca hortative construction. Lingua 245  pp. 102928 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.