Identity (self-)deconstruction in Chinese police’s civil conflict mediation
Wenjing Feng | Nanjing University
Xinren Chen | Nanjing University
While recent pragmatic research on identity in discourse mainly focuses on ubiquitous construction of one’s own or
others’ identity, inadequate attention has been directed to the frequently occurring deconstruction of self-constructed and
other-assigned identities. Drawing on transcripts of recordings of 19 Chinese police officer-mediated interactions, this study
examines what, how and why self-constructed and other-assigned identities of police officers are deconstructed. Qualitative
analysis of the data shows that Chinese police officers’ self-constructed non-institutional identities were often deconstructed by
disputants via negating their contextual appropriateness or their social or institutional rightness, whereas police officers also
often deconstructed the institutional identities assigned to them by the disputants via negating the validity of the assigned
institutional identity or the institutional relationship. It is argued that the cause of this identity deconstruction phenomenon
is rooted in police officers’ identity dilemma arising from social changes regarding police work in China.
Keywords: institutional discourse, identity, pragmatic identity, identity deconstruction, mediation, Chinese police mediation
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Previous research on identity deconstruction
- 2.2Previous research on Chinese mediation
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Research questions
- 3.2Data collection
- 3.3Data analysis
- 4.Results of the study
- 4.1Disputants’ deconstruction of police officers’ self-constructed non-institutional identities
- 4.1.1By negating the appropriateness of the identities for the institutional setting
- 4.1.2By negating the social rightness of the identities
- 4.2Police officers’ deconstruction of identities assigned by the disputants
- 4.2.1By negating the validity of the other-assigned institutional identity and clarifying a non-institutional identity or communicative goal
- 4.2.2By negating the institutional relationship and claiming a non-institutional relationship
- 4.1Disputants’ deconstruction of police officers’ self-constructed non-institutional identities
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 03 June 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19039.fen
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19039.fen
References
Antaki, Charles, and Sue Widdicombe
Benwell, Bethan, and Elizabeth Stokoe
Bercal, Thomas E.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
Buerger, Michael E., Anthony J. Petrosino, and Carolyn Petrosino
Chan, Angela, Stephanie Schnurr, and Olga Zayts
Chen, Xinren
Cooper, Christopher
Davies, Bethan L.
D’Cruz, Carolyn
Deaux, Kay, and Kathleen A. Ethier
De Fina, Anna, Deborah Schiffrin, and Michael Bamberg
Deng, Yiheng, Kaibin Xu, Xiaoqiu Fu, and Sang Ma
Dobs, Abby Mueller
Donaghue, Helen
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolino
Gamson, Joshua
Gao, Wenying
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch, and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
Garcia, Angela Cora
Habermas, Jürgen
Haugh, Michael
Heisterkamp, Brian L.
Jacobs, Scott
Jiang, Ting
Jin, Ying
Ke, Xianbing
Klooster, Susan A. van ’T., Marjolein B. A. van Asselt, and Sjaak P. Koenis
Li, Cheng-Tuan, and Yong-Ping Ran
Li, Cheng-Tuan, Yong-Ping Ran, and Daniel Kádár
Li, Xiangyun, and Chengfang Song
Locher, Miriam A.
Locher, Miriam A., Brook Bolander, and Nicole Höhn
Malinowski, Bronislaw
Ma, Peipei
Marinova, Diana
Morasso, Sara Greco
Mullany, Louise
Ran, Yongping, and Linsen Zhao
Richards, Keith
Sacks, Harvey
Schnurr, Stephanie, and Olga Zayts
Shen, Zhengwei
Stokoe, Elizabeth, and Rein Sikveland
Tong, Shan
van Dijk, Teun A.
Verschueren, Jef
Volpe, Maria R.
Wagner, Wolfgang, Peter Holtz, and Yoshihisa Kashima
Wall, James, and Michael Blum
Wang, Ting
Wen, Xu
Xu, Youping
Yuan, Zhoumin
Full-text
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Jiang, Qingsheng
Liu, Hao & Xinren Chen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.