Identity (self-)deconstruction in Chinese police’s civil conflict mediation
While recent pragmatic research on identity in discourse mainly focuses on ubiquitous construction of one’s own or
others’ identity, inadequate attention has been directed to the frequently occurring deconstruction of self-constructed and
other-assigned identities. Drawing on transcripts of recordings of 19 Chinese police officer-mediated interactions, this study
examines what, how and why self-constructed and other-assigned identities of police officers are deconstructed. Qualitative
analysis of the data shows that Chinese police officers’ self-constructed non-institutional identities were often deconstructed by
disputants via negating their contextual appropriateness or their social or institutional rightness, whereas police officers also
often deconstructed the institutional identities assigned to them by the disputants via negating the validity of the assigned
institutional identity or the institutional relationship. It is argued that the cause of this identity deconstruction phenomenon
is rooted in police officers’ identity dilemma arising from social changes regarding police work in China.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Previous research on identity deconstruction
- 2.2Previous research on Chinese mediation
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Research questions
- 3.2Data collection
- 3.3Data analysis
- 4.Results of the study
- 4.1Disputants’ deconstruction of police officers’ self-constructed non-institutional identities
- 4.1.1By negating the appropriateness of the identities for the institutional setting
- 4.1.2By negating the social rightness of the identities
- 4.2Police officers’ deconstruction of identities assigned by the disputants
- 4.2.1By negating the validity of the other-assigned institutional identity and clarifying a non-institutional identity or communicative goal
- 4.2.2By negating the institutional relationship and claiming a non-institutional relationship
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References
Antaki, Charles, and Sue Widdicombe
1998 “
Identity as an Achievement and as a Tool.” In
Identities in Talk. ed. by
Charles Antaki, and
Sue Widdicombe, 1–15. London: Sage.
Benwell, Bethan, and Elizabeth Stokoe
2006 Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Bercal, Thomas E.
1970 “
Calls for Police Assistance: Consumer Demands for Governmental Service.”
American Behavioral Sciences 13 (5): 681–690.
Black, Donald
1980 The Manners and Customs of the Police. New York: Academic Press.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
2005 “
Identity and Interaction: A Socio-cultural Linguistic Approach.”
Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614.
Buerger, Michael E., Anthony J. Petrosino, and Carolyn Petrosino
1999 “
Extending the Police Role: Implications of Police Mediation as a Problem- Solving Tool.”
Police Quarterly 2 (2): 125–149.
Chan, Angela, Stephanie Schnurr, and Olga Zayts
2018 “
Exploring Face, Identity and Relationship Management in Disagreements in Business Meetings in Hong Kong.”
Journal of Politeness Research 14 (2): 233–260.
Chen, Rong, and Xinren Chen
2020 “
Introduction.”
East Asian Pragmatics 5 (1):1–8.
Chen, Xinren
2013 “
语用身份:动态选择与话语建构 [Pragmatic Identity: Dynamic Choice and Discursive Construction].”
Foreign Languages Research 41: 27–112.
Chen, Xinren
2014 “
语用学视角下的身份研究—关键问题与主要路径 [Current Research on Identity from the Pragmatic Perspective: Key Issues and Main Approaches].”
Modern Foreign Languages 37 (5): 702–710.
Chen, Xinren
2018 Pragmatic Identity: How to Do Things with Words of Identity. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
Chen, Xinren
2020 “
Identity Work and Politeness Evaluation.”
Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages 43 (2): 1–10.
Cooper, Christopher
2001 “
Mediation in Black and White: Mediation Center-Police Partnerships – A Dignified Police Response.”
Mediation Quarterly 18 (3): 281–295.
Davies, Bethan L.
2018 “
Evaluating Evaluations: What Different Types of Metapragmatic Behaviour Can Tell Us About Participants’ Understandings of the Moral Order.”
Journal of Politeness Research 14 (1): 121–151.
D’Cruz, Carolyn
2008 Identity Politics in Deconstruction: Calculating with the Incalculable. England, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Deaux, Kay, and Kathleen A. Ethier
1998 “
Negotiating Social Identity.” In
Prejudice: The Target’s Perspective, ed. by
Janet K. Swim, and
Charles Stangor, 301–323. San Diego: Academic Press.
De Fina, Anna, Deborah Schiffrin, and Michael Bamberg
2006 Discourse and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deng, Yiheng, Kaibin Xu, Xiaoqiu Fu, and Sang Ma
2013 “
Mediating Conflict on TV: A Discourse Analysis of the Gold Medal Mediation Episodes.”
China Media Research 9 (4): 5–14.
Donaghue, Helen
2015 The Construction and Negotiation of Identity and Face in Post Observation Feedback. PhD dissertation, Aston University, UK.
Donaghue, Helen
2018 “
Relational Work and Identity Negotiation in Critical Post Observation Teacher Feedback.”
Journal of Pragmatics 1351: 101–116.
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolino
1993 “
Outline of Discourse Transcription.” In
Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. by
Jane A. Edwards, and
Martin D. Lampert. 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gamson, Joshua
1995 “
Must Identity Movements Self-Destruct? A Queer Dilemma.”
Social Problems 42 (3): 390–407.
Gao, Wenying
2008 “
警察调解制度研究 [Study on the Mechanism of Police Mediation].”
Journal of Chinese People’s Public Security University 134 (4): 127–134.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch, and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
2013 “
Identity and Impoliteness: The Expert in the Talent Show Idol.”
Journal of Politeness Research 91: 97–121.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2018 “
Globalization, Transnational Identities, and Conflict Talk: The Superdiversity and Complexity of the Latino Identity.”
Journal of Pragmatics 1341: 120–133.
Habermas, Jürgen
1976 “
What Is Universal Pragmatics?” In
On the Pragmatics of Communication, ed. by
Maeve Cooke, 21–103. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Haugh, Michael
2009 “
Face and Interaction.” In
Face, Communication and Social Interaction, ed. by
Bargiela-Chiappini Francesca, and
Michael Haugh, 1–16. London: Equinox.
Heisterkamp, Brian L.
2006 “
Conversational Displays of Mediator Neutrality in a Court-based Program.”
Journal of Pragmatics 381: 2051–2064.
Jacobs, Scott
2002 “
Maintaining Neutrality in Dispute Mediation: Managing Disagreement While Managing Not to Disagree.”
Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1403–1426.
Jiang, Ting
2016 “
态度系统视阈下仲裁员调解话语的人际意义分析 [On Interpersonal Meanings in Arbitrators’ Mediation Discourse: A Perspective from Attitude System].”
Modern Foreign Languages 39 (2): 188–197.
Jin, Ying
2018 “
Small Talk in Medical Conversations: Data from China.”
Journal of Pragmatics, 1341: 31–44.
Ke, Xianbing
2017 “
‘我(不)想X/Y’ 法庭调解话语策略表达机制研究 [An Empirical Study of Court-related Strategical Mediated Discourse Mechanism: A Case Study of ‘I Don’t Want X/Y’].”
Journal of Zhejiang International Studies University 21: 3–11.
Klooster, Susan A. van ’T., Marjolein B. A. van Asselt, and Sjaak P. Koenis
2002 “
Beyond the Essential Contestation: Construction and Deconstruction of Regional Identity.”
Ethics, Place & Environment 5 (2): 109–121.
Li, Cheng-Tuan, and Yong-Ping Ran
2016 “
Self-professional Identity Construction Through Other-identity Deconstruction in Chinese Televised Debating Discourse.”
Journal of Pragmatics 941: 47–63.
Li, Cheng-Tuan, Yong-Ping Ran, and Daniel Kádár
2018 “
Constructing Self-expert Identity via Other-identity Negation in Chinese Televised Debating Discourse.”
Text & Talk 38 (4): 435–455.
Li, Xiangyun, and Chengfang Song
2014 “
离婚调解话语中男女权力失衡问题研究 [An Analysis of the Power Imbalance Between Men and Women in Divorce Mediation Discourse].”
Journal of Ocean University of China 41:123–128.
Locher, Miriam A.
2011 “
Situated Impoliteness: The Interface Between Relational Work and Identity Construction.” In
Situated Politeness, ed. by
Bethan L. Davies,
Michael Haugh, and
Andrew John Merrison, 187–208. London: Bloomsbury.
Locher, Miriam A., Brook Bolander, and Nicole Höhn
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1923 “
The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages.” In
The Meaning of Meaning, ed. by
Charles Kay Ogden, and
Ivor Armstrong Richards, 296–336. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ma, Peipei
2011 “
汉语称呼语中“老”字的权势与等同关系探析 [The Power and Solidarity of the Word “Lao” in Chinese Address Terms].”
Journal of Hebei North University 27 (2): 42–44.
Marinova, Diana
2007 Neutrality in Mediation Hearing: Managing the Mediation Process without Bias. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, D. C.
Mullany, Louise
2008 “
Impoliteness, Power and Gender Identity in the Professional Workplace.” In
Impoliteness in Language, ed. by
Derek Bousfield, and
Miriam A. Locher, 231–251. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
Poovey, Mary
1988 “
Feminism and Deconstruction.”
Feminist Studies 14 (1): 51–65.
Ran, Yongping, and Linsen Zhao
2018 “
Building Mutual Affection-based Face in Conflict Mediation: A Chinese Relationship Management Model.”
Journal of Pragmatics 1291: 185–198.
Richards, Keith
2006 “
‘Being the Teacher’: Identity and Classroom Conversation.”
Applied Linguistics 271: 51–77.
Sacks, Harvey
1972 “
On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” In
Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by.
John J. Gumperz, and
Dell Hymes, 325–345. New York: Blackwell.
Schnurr, Stephanie, and Olga Zayts
2011 “
Be(com)ing a Leader: A Case Study of Co-constructing Professional Identities at Work.” In
Constructing Identities at Work, ed. by
Jo Angouri, and
Meredith Marra, 40–60. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shen, Zhengwei
2015 “
民警在治安调解中的效力分析 [Analysis on the Effectiveness of Police in Public Security Mediation].”
Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers 81 (6): 51–54.
Stokoe, Elizabeth, and Rein Sikveland
2016 “
Formulating Solutions in Mediation.”
Journal of Pragmatics 1051: 101–113.
Tong, Shan
2013 A Conversation-analytic Study of People’ s Mediating Utterances. PhD dissertation, East China Normal University, China.
Tracy, Karen
2002 Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. New York: Guilford Press.
Tracy, Karen
2008 “
‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate Face-attack.”
Journal of Politeness Research 41: 169–191.
van Dijk, Teun A.
2009 Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Verschueren, Jef
2000 Understanding Pragmatics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Volpe, Maria R.
2014 “
Police and Mediation: Natural, Unimaginable or Both.” In
Moving Toward a Just Peace: The Mediation Continuum, ed. by
Jan Marie Fritz, 91–105. New York, London: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg.
Wagner, Wolfgang, Peter Holtz, and Yoshihisa Kashima
2009 “
Construction and Deconstruction of Essence in Representating Social Groups: Identity Projects, Stereotyping, and Racism.”
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (3): 363–383.
Wall, James, and Michael Blum
1991 “
Community Mediation in the People’s Republic of China.”
Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (1): 3–20.
Wang, Ting
2014 “
完善我国警察调解制度的几点建议 [On Police Mediation in China].”
Journal of China Maritime Police Academy 12 (3): 69–75.
Wen, Xu
2018 “
言语交际中称谓的认知语用问题 [Cognitive-Pragmatic Aspects of Vocatives in Verbal Communication].”
Journal of Zhejiang International Studies University 21: 35–40.
Xu, Youping
2019 “
Scolding ‘Brothers’ and Caring ‘Friends’: Discursive Construction of the Identity of China Media Research.”
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 32 (1): 135–153.
Yuan, Zhoumin
2011 An Empirical Study of Medical Consultants’ Pragmatic Identity Construction from the Adaptationist Perspective. PhD dissertation, Nanjing University, China.
Zhao, Lizhi
2017 “
中国当代警察身份认同问题探析—体制、文化、社会环境视角 [Identity Struggle of Contemporary Chinese Policemen: from the Perspective of System, Culture and Social Environment].”
Journal of Sichuan Police College 29 (2): 7–16.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Jiang, Qingsheng
2022.
Xinren Chen: Exploring identity work in Chinese communication.
Folia Linguistica 56:1
► pp. 227 ff.
Liu, Hao & Xinren Chen
2021.
The identity work of Chinese charities in their online donation-oriented crowdfunding appeals.
Discourse, Context & Media 42
► pp. 100514 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.