Dichotomy in the structures of honorifics of Japanese

Tokunaga, Misato

doi:10.1075/prag.2.2.02tok

Article published In:

Pragmatics
Vol. 2:2 (1992) ► pp.127–140

Dichotomy in the structures of honorifics of Japanese

Misato Tokunaga

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

Published online: 1 June 1992

https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.2.2.02tok

References (16)

Araki, H

(1983) Nihongo kara Nihonjin o kangaeru (A study of the Japanese people from the viewpoint of their language). Tokyo: Asahi-Shinbun-Sha.

(1983) Keigo Nihonjin Ron (Honorifics: the Japanese). Kyoto: PHP Kenkyuu-jo.

Doi, T

(1973) The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha International, Ltd.

Ikegami, Y

(1981) “Sunt” to “Nam” no Gengo-gaku: Gengo to Bunka no Taipologii e no shiron. (Linguistics of “Do” and “Become”: A tentative typological analysis of language and culture). Tokyo: Taishuukan.

(1982) “Hyoogen Koozoo no Hikaku: Suruteki na gengo to Naruteki na gengo” (A comparison in the mechanism of expression: Do-language and Become-language). In Kunihiro (ed.) Nichi-Ei-Go Hikaku Kooza Vol.4: Hassoo to Hyoogen (Comparative studies of Japanese and English Vol.4: Conception and expression). Tokyo: Taishuukan, pp.67-109.

Kuno, S

(1978) Danwa no Bumpoo (Grammar of discourse). Tokyo: Taishuukan.

(1987) Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and emphathy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. BoP

Matsumoto, Y

Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese”. Journal of Pragmatics 121: 403-426. North-Holland.

Tbkunaga, M

(1985) “A strategy for objective expressions in Japanese”. In Journal of Asian Culture Vol.91: 181-198. Graduate Studies in Asian Studies at UCLA.

(1986) “Affective debris in Japanese: A case study of directional verbs”. Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Michigan.

(1988) “A paradox in Japanese pragmatics”. Papers in Pragmatics 2(1/2): 84-105. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.

(1988) “Integrating pragmatics into the language instruction: A rule for choice of appropriate expressions in Japanese”, (unpublished paper). Presented at the Conference on Innovations in Teaching Chinese and Japanese at Rutgers University, March.

(1989) “A paradoxical functions of passives in Japanese pragmatics”. Tb appear in Papers of the LACUS Forum. Linguistics Associations of Canada and the United States.

(1990) “Structural dichotomy and pragmatics in Japanese”. Paper presented at the Conference on Japanese Linguistics and Language. Middlebury College.

(1991a) “Integrating pragmatics and pedagogy: A case of the Japanese passives and causatives”. Gengo Kyooku Kenkyu Vol.21: 105-114. Institute of Linguistics and Language. Kanda University of International Studies.

(1991b) “Semantics of the passive and causative suffixes in Japanese”. Pan-Asiatic linguistics: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Language and Linguistics Vol.1: 324-338. Chulalongkorn University.

Cited by (4)

Cited by 4 other publications

Order by:

Okamoto, Shigeko

1997. Social context, linguistic ideology, and indexical expressions in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 28:6 ► pp. 795 ff.

Okamoto, Shigeko

2011. The use and interpretation of addressee honorifics and plain forms in Japanese: Diversity, multiplicity, and ambiguity. Journal of Pragmatics 43:15 ► pp. 3673 ff.

Okamoto, Shigeko

2022. Situated politeness. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 51 ff.

O'Driscoll, Jim

1996. About face: A defence and elaboration of universal dualism. Journal of Pragmatics 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.