(1983) “Conditionals and antecedent possibilities”. Journal of Pragmatics 71: 297-309.
Bazzanella, C
(1990) “ ‘Modal’ uses of the Italian indicativo imperfetto in a pragmatic perspective”. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 439-459.
Boer, M. de
(1987) “The Italian conditional”. Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp.
Brown, P. and S.C. Levinson
(1987) Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dik, S.C
(1986) “Linguistically motivated knowledge representation”. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 9. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Fillmore, Ch.J
(1971) “Types of lexical information”. In D.D. Steinberg & L.A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics. An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 370-392.
Fillmore, Ch.J
(1975) Santa Cruz lectures on deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Fraser, B
(1975) “Hedged performatives”. In P. Cole & J.M. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 187-211.
Fraser, B
(1980) “Conversational mitigation”. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 341-350. BoP
Grice, H.P
(1975) “Logic and conversation”. In P. Cole & J.M. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 41-59.
Halliday, M.A.K
. & R. Hasan (1990) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Haverkate, H
(1979) Impositive sentences in Spanish. Theory and description in linguistic pragmatics. Amsterdam: North-Holland. BoP
(1975) “On assertive predicates”. In J. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics 4. New York: Academic Press, 91-124.
Jespersen, O
(1955) The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen-Unwin.
Koike, D.A
(1989) “Requests and the role of deixis”. Journal of Pragmatics 131: 187-202.
Lakoff, G
(1972) “Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts”. In P.M. Peranteauet al. (eds.), Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 183-228.
Rauh, G
(1983) “Aspects of deixis”. In G. Rauh (ed.), Essays on deixis. Tübingen: Narr, 9-60. BoP
Searle, J.R
(1969) Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J.R
(1976) “A classification of illocutionary acts”. Language in Society 51: 1-23.
Spitzer, L
(1918) Aufsätze zur romanischen Syntax und Stilistik. Halle: Niemeyer.
Urmson, J.O
(1952) “Parenthetical verbs”. Mind 611: 480-496. BoP
Cited by
Cited by 23 other publications
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca & Sandra J. Harris
1996. Requests and status in business correspondence. Journal of Pragmatics 26:5 ► pp. 635 ff.
Caffi, C.
2006. Mitigation. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 171 ff.
Caffi, Claudia
1999. On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics 31:7 ► pp. 881 ff.
Caffi, Claudia & Richard W. Janney
1994. Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication. Journal of Pragmatics 22:3-4 ► pp. 325 ff.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda & Yoonjeong Kim
2021. “Let’s kill him”: self-reference pronouns and speaking roles in capital trials. Social Semiotics 31:4 ► pp. 585 ff.
Delbene, Roxana
2012. Patients' Ways of Speaking About Antiretroviral Medications and Possible Implications for Adherence. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 9:4 ► pp. 281 ff.
Dieltjens, Sylvain & Priscilla Heynderickx
2003. The Indefinite “We” (HET “WIJ”-Gevoel/Le “Nous” Indéfini)—Sender and Receiver References in Top-Down Communication: A Text Type-Based Approach. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 33:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Flores-Ferrán, Nydia
2010. An examination of mitigation strategies used in Spanish psychotherapeutic discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42:7 ► pp. 1964 ff.
Ho, Debbie G.E., Alex Henry & Sharifah N.H. Alkaff
2023. DIRECTIVE ACTS IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL DISCOURSE: SCALE OF ILLOCUTIONARY FORCE INTENSITY. Mìžnarodnij fìlologìčnij časopis 14:2
Kravchenko, Nataliia K., Sviatoslav I. Vylinskyi & Oleksandr I. Yudenko
2022. DEICTIC MITIGATION VS COMMISSIVE ACTS IN POLITICAL INTERVIEW (BASED ON THE MODERN EUROPEAN DISCOURSE OF AID TO UKRAINE). Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology 2:24 ► pp. 193 ff.
Lü, Pi-Hsia
2016. Status-Congruence in Request E-Mail Discourse of Professional Secretaries in a University of Taiwan. In Email Discourse Among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca, ► pp. 231 ff.
Martiny, T.
1996. Forms of address in French and Dutch: a sociopragmatic approach.. Language Sciences 18:3-4 ► pp. 765 ff.
Mohammed Saleh Al-Hamzi, Ali, Sumarlam, Riyadi Santosa & Mujtaba Jamal
2023. A pragmatic and discourse study of common deixis used by Yemeni-Arab preachers in friday Islamic sermons at Yemeni mosques. Cogent Arts & Humanities 10:1
Montenegro, Roberto E. & Gonen Dori-Hacohen
2020. Morality in sugar talk: Presenting blood glucose levels in routine diabetes medical visits. Social Science & Medicine 253 ► pp. 112925 ff.
Nickerson, C. & F. Bargiela-Chiappini
1996. At the intersection between grammar and pragmatics: a contrastive study of personal pronouns and other forms of address in Dutch and Italian. Language Sciences 18:3-4 ► pp. 743 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.