Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 2:4 (1992) ► pp.505522
References
Auwera, J. van der
(1983) “Conditionals and antecedent possibilities”. Journal of Pragmatics 71: 297-309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, C
(1990) “ ‘Modal’ uses of the Italian indicativo imperfetto in a pragmatic perspective”. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 439-459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boer, M. de
(1987) “The Italian conditional”. Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp.
Brown, P. and S.C. Levinson
(1987) Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, S.C
(1986) “Linguistically motivated knowledge representation”. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 9. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Ch.J
(1971) “Types of lexical information”. In D.D. Steinberg & L.A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics. An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 370-392.Google Scholar
(1975) Santa Cruz lectures on deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Fraser, B
(1975) “Hedged performatives”. In P. Cole & J.M. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 187-211.Google Scholar
(1980) “Conversational mitigation”. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 341-350. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P
(1975) “Logic and conversation”. In P. Cole & J.M. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 41-59.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
. & R. Hasan (1990) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Haverkate, H
(1979) Impositive sentences in Spanish. Theory and description in linguistic pragmatics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hooper, J.B
(1975) “On assertive predicates”. In J. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics 4. New York: Academic Press, 91-124.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O
(1955) The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen-Unwin.Google Scholar
Koike, D.A
(1989) “Requests and the role of deixis”. Journal of Pragmatics 131: 187-202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G
(1972) “Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts”. In P.M. Peranteau et al. (eds.), Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 183-228.Google Scholar
Rauh, G
(1983) “Aspects of deixis”. In G. Rauh (ed.), Essays on deixis. Tübingen: Narr, 9-60.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.R
(1969) Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1976) “A classification of illocutionary acts”. Language in Society 51: 1-23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, L
(1918) Aufsätze zur romanischen Syntax und Stilistik. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Urmson, J.O
(1952) “Parenthetical verbs”. Mind 611: 480-496. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 23 other publications

Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca & Sandra J. Harris
1996. Requests and status in business correspondence. Journal of Pragmatics 26:5  pp. 635 ff. DOI logo
Caffi, C.
2006. Mitigation. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Caffi, Claudia
1999. On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics 31:7  pp. 881 ff. DOI logo
Caffi, Claudia & Richard W. Janney
1994. Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication. Journal of Pragmatics 22:3-4  pp. 325 ff. DOI logo
Chaemsaithong, Krisda & Yoonjeong Kim
2021. “Let’s kill him”: self-reference pronouns and speaking roles in capital trials. Social Semiotics 31:4  pp. 585 ff. DOI logo
Delbene, Roxana
2012. Patients' Ways of Speaking About Antiretroviral Medications and Possible Implications for Adherence. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 9:4  pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Dieltjens, Sylvain & Priscilla Heynderickx
2003. The Indefinite “We” (HET “WIJ”-Gevoel/Le “Nous” Indéfini)—Sender and Receiver References in Top-Down Communication: A Text Type-Based Approach. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 33:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Flores-Ferrán, Nydia
2010. An examination of mitigation strategies used in Spanish psychotherapeutic discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42:7  pp. 1964 ff. DOI logo
Ho, Debbie G.E., Alex Henry & Sharifah N.H. Alkaff
2022. “You don’t seem to know how to work”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 391 ff. DOI logo
Kravchenko, N & A Pozhar
2023. DIRECTIVE ACTS IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL DISCOURSE: SCALE OF ILLOCUTIONARY FORCE INTENSITY. Mìžnarodnij fìlologìčnij časopis 14:2 DOI logo
Kravchenko, Nataliia K., Sviatoslav I. Vylinskyi & Oleksandr I. Yudenko
2022. DEICTIC MITIGATION VS COMMISSIVE ACTS IN POLITICAL INTERVIEW (BASED ON THE MODERN EUROPEAN DISCOURSE OF AID TO UKRAINE). Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology 2:24  pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Lü, Pi-Hsia
2016. Status-Congruence in Request E-Mail Discourse of Professional Secretaries in a University of Taiwan. In Email Discourse Among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca,  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Martiny, T.
1996. Forms of address in French and Dutch: a sociopragmatic approach.. Language Sciences 18:3-4  pp. 765 ff. DOI logo
Mohammed Saleh Al-Hamzi, Ali, Sumarlam, Riyadi Santosa & Mujtaba Jamal
2023. A pragmatic and discourse study of common deixis used by Yemeni-Arab preachers in friday Islamic sermons at Yemeni mosques. Cogent Arts & Humanities 10:1 DOI logo
Montenegro, Roberto E. & Gonen Dori-Hacohen
2020. Morality in sugar talk: Presenting blood glucose levels in routine diabetes medical visits. Social Science & Medicine 253  pp. 112925 ff. DOI logo
Nickerson, C. & F. Bargiela-Chiappini
1996. At the intersection between grammar and pragmatics: a contrastive study of personal pronouns and other forms of address in Dutch and Italian. Language Sciences 18:3-4  pp. 743 ff. DOI logo
Piippo, Irina
2021. Mirror-like address practice in Arabic-medium classroom interaction. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326],  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez-Piedrabuena, Sandra
2022. La lengua de Hécuba como suplicante en la tragedia homónima. Emerita 90:1  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2013. MITIGATED DISAGREEMENT IN LEARNER DISCUSSION FORA: A FACILITATOR’S PERSPECTIVE. Discourse and Interaction 6:1  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Turnbull, William & Karen L. Saxton
1997. Modal expressions as facework in refusals to comply with requests: I think I should say ‘no’ right now. Journal of Pragmatics 27:2  pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
UȚĂ BĂRBULESCU, OANA & MELANIA ROIBU
2023. Câteva observații despre... noi. Clusivitatea în limba română. Studii și cercetări lingvistice 2023:2  pp. 306 ff. DOI logo
Wilson, Nick
2019. Chapter 2. When we means you. In The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 304],  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Grace
2016. Elastic language in TV discussion discourse. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 3:2  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.