I suggest that promises and threats are similar speech acts and pose analogous problems for Speech Act Theory. After showing that they share the same formal types, I argue against there being purportedly fundamental differences between them in regard to explicitability, deontics, and illocution/perlocution. I conclude that the joint analysis of promises and threats suggests the propriety of a holistic theory of illocutionary acts.
(1968) And that’s a promise. The Philosophical Quarterly 18.72: 225-237.
(1979) Promises and the law of contract. Mind 88.351: 410-418. BoP
(1981) Promises, morals and law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. BoP
(1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2002) Conditional promises and threats – Cognition and emotion. Proceedings of the Twenty- Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 113-118.
Beller, S. and Bender, A.
(2004) Cultural differences in the cognition and emotion of conditional promises and threats – Comparing Germany and Tonga. In K.D. Forbus, D. Gentner and T. Regier (eds), Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 85-90.
(1989) Threats and illocutions. Journal of Pragmatics 131: 501-522. BoP
(1977) Promises and threats. Mind 86.344: 578-581. BoP
(1976) The primacy of promising. Mind 85.339: 321-340.
(1965) What is a speech act? In M. Black (ed.), Philosophy in America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. London: Allen and Unwin.
(1969) Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1975) A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Searle, J.R., and D. Vanderveken
(1985) Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1990/91) Meaning and Speech Acts, 2 vols1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Verbrugge, S., K. Dieussaert, W. Schaeken, and W. Van Belle
(2004) Promise is debt, threat another matter: The effect of credibility on the interpretation of conditional promises and threats. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 58.2: 106-112.
(2000) Scare Tactics. Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threat. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Walton, D., and F. Macagno
(2007) The fallaciousness of threats: Character and ad baculum. Argumentation 211: 63-81.
Cited by 18 other publications
2022. Beliefs, Commitments, and Ad Baculum Arguments. Languages 7:2 ► pp. 107 ff.
2021. “You are in Trouble!”: A Discursive Psychological Analysis of Threatening Language in Chinese Cellphone Fraud Interactions. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 34:4 ► pp. 1065 ff.
Davidson, Ronald M.
2014. Studies indhāraṇīliterature II: Pragmatics ofdhāraṇīs. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 77:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
2023. Heteroglossia and Identifying Victims of Violence and Its Purpose as Constructed in Terrorist Threatening Discourse Online. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 36:2 ► pp. 907 ff.
Ioanesyan, E. R.
2022. Discursive Formulas Derived from Propositional Predicates. Nauchnyi dialog 11:8 ► pp. 24 ff.
Ioanesyan, E. R.
2023. Illocutionary Indicators: A Comparative-Typological Perspective. Nauchnyi dialog 12:8 ► pp. 143 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.