Article published In:
Vol. 20:2 (2010) ► pp.213228
Árdal, P.S.
(1968) And that’s a promise. The Philosophical Quarterly 18.72: 225-237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, P.S.
(1979) Promises and the law of contract. Mind 88.351: 410-418. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1981) Promises, morals and law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Austin, J.L.
(1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beller, S.
(2002) Conditional promises and threats – Cognition and emotion. Proceedings of the Twenty- Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 113-118.
Beller, S. and Bender, A.
(2004) Cultural differences in the cognition and emotion of conditional promises and threats – Comparing Germany and Tonga. In K.D. Forbus, D. Gentner and T. Regier (eds), Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 85-90.
Beller, S., A. Bender, and G. Kuhnmünch
(2005) Understanding conditional promises and threats. Thinking & Reasoning 11.3: 209-238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J.
(1991) How do gestures succeed? In E. Lepore and R. van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and his critics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3-15.Google Scholar
Blanco Salgueiro, A.
(2004) Palabras al viento. Ensayo sobre la fuerza ilocucionaria. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar
Blanco Salgueiro, A. et al.
(2007) Un rompecabezas acerca de la fuerza. In C. Martínez . (eds.), Current topics in logic and analytic philosophy. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, pp. 53-77.Google Scholar
Blanco Salgueiro, A.
(2008) Cómo hacer cosas malas con palabras: Actos ilocucionarios hostiles y los fundamentos de la Teoría de los Actos de Habla. Crítica, Revista Hispnoamericana de Filosofía 40.118: 93-120.Google Scholar
Cartwright, J.P.W.
(1984) An evidentiary theory of promises. Mind 93.370: 230-248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castelfranchi, C., and M. Guerini
(2007) Is it a promise or a threat? Pragmatics & Cognition 15.2: 277-311. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Conison, J.
(1997) The pragmatics of promise. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 10.2: 273-322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corredor, C.
(2001) A comment on threats and communicative rationality. Theoria 16.40: 147-166.Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, M.
(1996) Las ideas, las palabras y las cosas. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Grant, C.K.
(1949) Promises. Mind 58.231: 359-366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J.
(1991) Comments on John Searle: “Meaning, communication and representation”. In E. Lepore and R. Van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and his critics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 17-29.Google Scholar
Habib, A.
(2008) Promises. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. E.N. Zalta. URL =[URL].
Habermas, J.
(1999) Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Harrison, J.
(1962) Knowing and promising. Mind 71.284: 443-457. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heath, J.
(1995) Threats, promises and communicative action. European Journal of Philosophy 3.3: 225-241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Is language a game? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26.1: 1-28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jack, H.
(1958) On the analysis of promises. The Journal of Philosophy 55.14: 597-604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimball, R.H.
(2006) What’s wrong with argumentum ad baculum? Reasons, threats, and logical norms. Argumentation 201: 89-100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kissine, M.
(2008) From predictions to promises. How to derive deontic commitment. Pragmatics & Cognition 16.3: 471-491. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Melden, A.I.
(1956) On promising. Mind 65.257: 49-66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicoloff, F.
(1989) Threats and illocutions. Journal of Pragmatics 131: 501-522. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Peetz, V.
(1977) Promises and threats. Mind 86.344: 578-581. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Robins, M.H.
(1976) The primacy of promising. Mind 85.339: 321-340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.R.
(1965) What is a speech act? In M. Black (ed.), Philosophy in America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1969) Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1975) A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J.R., and D. Vanderveken
(1985) Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vanderveken, D.
(1990/91) Meaning and Speech Acts, 2 vols1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verbrugge, S., K. Dieussaert, W. Schaeken, and W. Van Belle
(2004) Promise is debt, threat another matter: The effect of credibility on the interpretation of conditional promises and threats. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 58.2: 106-112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, D.
(2000) Scare Tactics. Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threat. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Walton, D., and F. Macagno
(2007) The fallaciousness of threats: Character and ad baculum . Argumentation 211: 63-81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 18 other publications

Casey, John
2022. Beliefs, Commitments, and Ad Baculum Arguments. Languages 7:2  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Jinshi
2021. “You are in Trouble!”: A Discursive Psychological Analysis of Threatening Language in Chinese Cellphone Fraud Interactions. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 34:4  pp. 1065 ff. DOI logo
Davidson, Ronald M.
2014. Studies indhāraṇīliterature II: Pragmatics ofdhāraṇīs. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 77:1  pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2023. Heteroglossia and Identifying Victims of Violence and Its Purpose as Constructed in Terrorist Threatening Discourse Online. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 36:2  pp. 907 ff. DOI logo
Ioanesyan, E. R.
2022. Discursive Formulas Derived from Propositional Predicates. Nauchnyi dialog 11:8  pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Ioanesyan, E. R.
2023. Illocutionary Indicators: A Comparative-Typological Perspective. Nauchnyi dialog 12:8  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Kern, Beate
2018. La promesa atenuada en el discurso parlamentario español. Spanish in Context 15:2  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Megger, Dawid & Igor Wysocki
2022. Coercion, voluntary exchange, and the Austrian School of Economics. Synthese 201:1 DOI logo
Moulinou, Iphigenia
2014. Striving to make the difference. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2:1  pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
Nick, I. M.
2018. In the wake of hate: A mixed-method analysis of anonymous threatening communications sent during the 2016 US presidential election. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 41:2  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Nowosielski, Diána
2016. Az ígéret beszédaktusának vizsgálata a mai magyar nyelvhasználatban. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 3:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Peters, Arne & Marije van Hattum
2021. Pseudonyms as carriers of contextualised threat in 19th-century Irish English threatening notices. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 42:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez, Juan Luis
2022. The interplay of greetings and promises. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Slutskiy, Pavel
2021. Threats of the Use of Force: “Mere Speech” or Rights Violation?. In Communication and Libertarianism,  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Tavory, Iddo
2020. Interviews and Inference: Making Sense of Interview Data in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology 43:4  pp. 449 ff. DOI logo
Wiśniewska-Przymusińska, Malwina
2020. T/V Pronouns and FTAs inthe Works of Sir Thomas Malory: Medieval Politeness and Impoliteness in Directives, Expressives, and Commissives. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 55:1  pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Zhukova, Valentina
2023. How to threaten in Russian: a constructionist approach. Russian Linguistics 47:2  pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.