Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 34:1 (2024) ► pp.81–108

Didn’t she say to you, “Oh my God! In Pafos?”

Hypothetical quotations in everyday conversation

ORCID logo | University of Cyprus
This study examines the linguistic and discursive format as well as the functions of hypothetical quotations in everyday, informal conversations amongst Greek Cypriot friends. Drawing from a dataset of 270 minutes of naturally-occurring conversations, this study documents the linguistic format of sixty-one hypothetical quotations and examines why speakers resort to formulating such quotations to begin with. To do so, Goffman’s (1981) work on footing and participation framework is employed along with an analysis of these quotations in interaction following the work of Goodwin (2007). This study shows that most instances of hypothetical quotations are formulated as direct quotations. There can be both self- and other-quotations, and the quotative can take various forms. Hypothetical quotations serve an array of discursive functions, such as showing the listener’s involvement in an interaction, creating humour, supporting one’s argument or refuting the argument of the other, in line with other studies in the literature.
Keywords: hypothetical quotations, constructed dialogue, informal oral discourse, Cypriot Greek
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Materials and methods
  • 3.Hypothetical quotations in informal Greek Cypriot interactions
    • 3.1The linguistic format of hypothetical quotations
    • 3.2The discursive forms and functions of hypothetical quotations
      • 3.2.1Acting as an argumentative device
      • 3.2.2Making an assessment and showing involvement
      • 3.2.3Enacting stereotypical characters
  • 4.Discussion and concluding remarks
  • Transcript conventions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 April 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20049.fot
References (57)
References
Acuña, Virginia. 2020. “Staging Mental Discursive Processes and Reactions: The Construction of Direct Reported Thought (DRT) in Conversational Storytelling”. Language in Society 50 (2): 235–57.Google Scholar
. 2021. “The Construction of Future and Hypothetical Dialogues in Third-party Complaints as Enactments of a Subsequent Direct Complaint”. Journal of Pragmatics 1811: 68–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles. 2003. “The Uses of Absurdity”. In Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview, ed. by Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 85–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles, and Ivan Leudar. 1990. “Claim-backing and Other Explanatory Genres in Talk”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 91: 279–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archakis, Argiris, and Dimitris Papazachariou. 2008. “Prosodic Cues of Identity Construction: Intensity in Greek Young Women’s Conversational Narratives”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12 (5): 627–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram. 2015. “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiquitous Meta-communicative Act”. In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, ed. by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner, 1–26. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, and Alexandra D’Arcy. 2009. “Localized Globalization: A Multi-local, Multivariate Investigation of Quotative Be Like”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13 (3): 291–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. “Quotations as Demonstrations”. Language 66 (4): 764–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2007. “Getting There First: Non-narrative Reported Speech in Interaction”. In Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 120–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2020. “‘And I Quote’: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Prime Minister’s Questions”. Journal of Pragmatics 1571: 89–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Daniel Weiss. 2020. “Doing Things with Quotes: Introduction”. Journal of Pragmatics 1571: 84–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fotiou, Constantina. 2015. “An Empirical Study of English in Cypriot Greek Conversations and Print Media”. PhD diss. University of EssexGoogle Scholar
. 2017a. “English–Greek Code-switching in Greek Cypriot Magazines and Newspapers – An Analysis of Its Textual Forms and Functions”. Journal of World Languages 4 (1): 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. “English Discourse Markers in Cypriot Greek”. In Researchers in Progress II. Languages in Contact: Languages with History. Proceedings of the 2nd UCY-LC International Forum of Young Researchers, ed. by Pedro J. Molina Muñoz, 103–116. Nicosia: Language Centre – University of Cyprus.Google Scholar
. 2018. “A Linguistic Analysis of Cypriot Greek–English Compound Verbs.” Lingua 2151: 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Debunking a Myth: The Greek Language in Cyprus Is Not Being Destroyed. A Linguistic Analysis of Cypriot Greek–English Codeswitching”. International Journal of Bilingualism 23 (6): 1358–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. ““Θέλεις huge sample για να φκάλεις valid statistical results [You want a huge sample to generate valid statistical results]”: A Conversational Analysis of Cypriot Greek – English Codeswitching”. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, ed. by Maria Chondrogianni, Simon Courtenage, Geoffrey Horrocks, Amalia Arvaniti, and Ianthi Tsimpli. London: Westminster Computation and Linguistics Group, pp. 93–105.Google Scholar
. 2022. “English in Cyprus: The Now and Then of English in a Former British Colony”. English Today: 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fotiou, Constantina, and Ioli Ayiomamitou. 2021. ““We Are in Cyprus, We Have to Use Our Language, Don’t We?” Pupils’ and Their Parents’ Attitudes towards Two Proximal Linguistic Varieties”. Linguistics and Education 631: 100931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fotiou, Constantina, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann. 2022. “A Small Island with Big Differences? Folk Perceptions in the Context of Dialect Levelling and Koineization”. Frontiers in Communication 61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Lebanon: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1990a. He-said-she-said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1990b. “Retellings, Pretellings and Hypothetical Stories”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 24 (1–4): 263–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Golato, Andrea. 2012. “Impersonal Quotation and Hypothetical Discourse”. In Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller, and Ingrid van Alphen, 3–36. Amsterdam, Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Interactive Footing”. In Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction ed. by Elizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 16–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haakana, Markku. 2007. “Reported Thought in Complaint Stories”. In Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 150–78. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haberland, Hartmut. 1986. “Reported Speech in Danish”. In Direct and Indirect Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 219–253. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement”. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth. 2000. “Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33 (4): 425–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “‘I’m Eyeing Your Chop Up Mind’: Reporting and Enacting”. In Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 47–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith Temkin. 1996. “Shadow Conversations: The Indeterminacy of Participant Roles”. In Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. by Michael Silverstein, and Greg Urban, 131–159. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Koester, Almut, and Michael Handford. 2018. “It’s Not Good Saying: ‘Well It Might Do That or It Might Not’: Hypothetical Reported Speech in Business Meetings”. Journal of Pragmatics 1301: 67–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lehner, Adrienne. 1989. “Remembering and Representing Prose: Quoted Speech as a Data Source”. Discourse Processes 121: 105–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayes, Patricia. 1990. “Quotation in Spoken English”. International Journal Studies in Language 14 (2): 325–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohammad, Abeer, and Camilla Vásquez. 2015. “‘Rachel’s Not Here’: Constructed Dialogue in Gossip”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19 (3): 351–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg. 1999. “Functions of Reported Speech in Group Discussions”. Applied Linguistics 20 (3): 376–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Innhwa. 2018. “Reported Thought as (Hypothetical) Assessment”. Journal of Pragmatics 1291: 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual, Esther. 2014. Fictive Interaction: The Conversation Frame in Thought, Language and Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual, Esther, and Todd Oakley. 2017. “Fictive Interaction”. In Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, 347–360. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims”. Human Studies 91: 219–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pujolar, Joan. 2001. Gender, Heteroglossia and Power: A Sociolinguistic Study of Youth Culture. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Sergeiy. 2016. Fictive Interaction and the Nature of Linguistic Meaning. In The Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction [ Human Cognitive Processing 55 ], ed. by Esther Pascual, and Sergeiy Sandler, 23–41. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Sergeiy, and Esther Pacual. 2019. “In the Beginning There Was Conversation”. Pragmatics 29 (2): 250–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandlund, Erica. 2014. “Prescribing Conduct: Enactments of Talk or Thought in Advice-Giving Sequences”. Discourse Studies 16 (5): 645–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sams, Jessie. 2010. “Quoting the Unspoken: An Analysis of Quotations in Spoken Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 421: 3147–3160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Katie, and Amanda LeCouteur. 2011. “‘Hypothetical Active-voicing’: Therapists ‘Modelling’ of Clients’ Future Conversations in CBT Interactions”. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3177–3192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1986. “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narratives”. In Direct and Indirect Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 311–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trester, Anna Marie. 2009. “Discourse Marker ‘Oh’ as a Means for Realizing the Identity Potential of Constructed Dialogue in Interaction”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13 (2): 147–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Daniel. 2020. “Analogical Reasoning with Quotations? A Spotlight on Russian Parliamentary Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 1551: 101–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winchatz, Michaela R., and Alexander Kozin. 2008. “Comical Hypothetical: Arguing for a Conversational Phenomenon”. Discourse Studies 10 (3): 383–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.