Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 31:4 (2021) ► pp.483–508

Understandable public anger

Legitimation in banking after the 2008 crisis

ORCID logo | Universidad de Navarra
In the ten years from 2008 onwards the banking sector was constantly in the spotlight. Blame for the financial crisis and concern regarding controversial government bailouts were followed by public outrage about inflated bonuses, money laundering and false reporting. Over this period, banks deployed a range of legitimation strategies to salvage their reputation. This paper proposes a modified typology of legitimation strategies based on previous research (van Leeuwen and Wodak 1999; Vaara, Tienari and Laurila 2006), and examines how these are used by in the “letter to shareholders” published by the chairs of the five main UK-based banks over the ten years following the crisis. The strategies are analysed in terms of their object, target and interdiscursive features, and the particular persuasive roles of narrative and emotion are underlined.
Keywords: legitimation, legitimation strategies, discourse strategies, narrative, metaphor, financial crisis, corporate communication, banking
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework: Legitimation strategies
  • 3.Method
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Normalisation
    • 4.2Authorisation
    • 4.3Rationalisation
    • 4.4Moralisation
      • 4.4.1Claims to virtue
      • 4.4.2Claiming solidarity and projecting empathy
    • 4.5Mythopoesis
      • 4.5.1Metaphor
      • 4.5.2Re-narrativisations
      • 4.5.3Future promise
    • 4.6Overview of strategies
  • 5.Discussion
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 27 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20065.bre
References (29)
References
Abulof, Uriel. 2015. “Normative Concepts Analysis: Unpacking the Language of Legitimation.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18 (1): 73–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breeze, Ruth. 2012. “Legitimation in Corporate Discourse: Oil Corporations after Deepwater Horizon.” Discourse & Society 23 (1): 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Negotiating Alignment in Newspaper Editorials: The Role of Concur-Counter Patterns.” Pragmatics 26 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basanta, Almudena, and Lieve Vangehuchten. 2019. “Las cartas de presentación en los informes de RSC en Chile, España y México” [“Introductory letters in CSR Reports in Chile, Spain and Mexico”]. Revista Ibérica 381: 99–126.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geppert, Mike. 2003. “Sensemaking and Politics in MNCs: A Comparative Analysis of Vocabularies within the Global Manufacturing Discourse in One Industrial Sector.” Journal of Management Inquiry 121: 312–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth, Mary Gergen, and Frank Barrett. 2004. “Dialogue: Life and Death of the Organization.” In Handbook of Organizational Discourse, ed. by David Grant, Cynthia Hardy, Cliff Oswick, and Linda Putnam, 39–60. Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannarakis, Grigoris, and Ioannis Theotokas. 2011. “The Effect of Financial Crisis in Corporate Social Responsibility Performance.” International Journal of Marketing Studies 3 (1): 2–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1973. Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hargie, Owen, Karyn Stapleton, and Dennis Tourish. 2010. “Interpretations of CEO Public Apologies for the Banking Crisis: Attributions of Blame and Avoidance of Responsibility.” Organization 17 (6): 721–742. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellín García, María José. 2013. “Legitimization and Delegitimization Strategies on Terrorism: A Corpus Based Analysis on Building Metaphors.” Pragmatics 23 (2): 301–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kostova, Tatiana, and Srilata Zaheer. 1999. “Organizational Legitimacy under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise.” Academy of Management Review 241: 64–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunter, and Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis. Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Orts, María Ángeles. 2016. “Power Distance and Persuasion: The Tension between Imposition and Legitimation in International Legal Genres.” Journal of Pragmatics 921: 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palazzo, Guido, and Andreas Georg Scherer. 2006. “Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework.” Journal of Business Ethics 661: 71–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poblete, Claudia. 2011. “Legitimation Strategies of the Deputies’ Discourse on the Constitutional Impeachment against the Education Minister of Chile.” Revista Signos 44 (76): 168–182.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2016. “The Discourse Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.), ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2017. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 44–59. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Antonio. 2011. “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions.” Discourse and Society 22 (6): 781–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suchman, M. (1995). “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaara, Eero and Tienari, Janne. (2008). “A Discursive Perspective on Legitimation Strategies in MNCs.” Academy of Management Review 331: 985–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaara, Eero, Janne Tienari, and Juha Laurila. 2006. “Pulp and Paper Fiction: On the Discursive Legitimation of Global Industrial Restructuring.” Organization Studies 271: 789–810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun, and Luisa Martín Rojo. 1997. “‘There was a Problem, and it was Solved!’: Legitimating the Expulsion of ‘Illegal’ Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse and Society 81: 523–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication 1(1): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Perspective.” Discourse Studies 11: 83–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Meyer, Michael. 2017. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Zelditch, Morris. 2001. “Theories of Legitimacy.” In The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations, ed. by John Jost and Brenda Major, 33–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Breeze, Ruth
2024. Lessons learned?. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Vallejo, Ana María
2023. Comunicar la sostenibilidad en las cadenas hoteleras españolas: el uso de las páginas web como herramienta de legitimación. Doxa Comunicación. Revista Interdisciplinar de Estudios de Comunicación y Ciencias Sociales ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.