Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 33:2 (2023) ► pp.260–284

Japanese no datta and no de atta in written discourse

Past forms of no da and no de aru

ORCID logo | University of Memphis
The present study examines no datta and no de atta, which are the past-tense forms of no da and no de aru in written Japanese. The analysis demonstrates that the choice between the present-tense no da/no de aru and the past-tense no datta/no de atta does not affect the temporal interpretation when they follow past-tense morphemes. However, a close examination has also revealed that the past-tense no datta/no de atta cannot follow a past-tense morpheme when the ongoing mode of discourse is non-narrative, while no da/no de aru and no datta/no de atta are both available options when the discourse is in the mode of narrative. The present study also suggests that when no datta/no de atta is used in narrative, it indicates that the stated information is less impactful, less dramatic, and more temporally distant, compared to the cases where no da/no de aru is used.
Keywords: Japanese, pragmatics, discourse analysis, n(o) da , no de aru , no datta , no de atta
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1 N(o) da and no de aru in Japanese
    • 1.2 No datta and no de atta: Past-tense forms of no da and no de aru
  • 2.The present study
  • 3.Data analysis
    • 3.1Present-tense morpheme + no datta/no de atta
    • 3.2Past-tense morpheme + no datta/no de atta
  • 4.Mode of discourse and the past-tense no datta/no de atta
  • 5. No da/no de aru no vs. no datta/no de atta in narrative discourse
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 24 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20079.nis
References (35)
References
Alfonso, Anthony. 1966. Japanese Language Patterns: A Structural Approach, Vol. 21. Tokyo: Sophia University LL Center of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Aoki, Haruo. 1986. “Evidentials in Japanese.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 223–238. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. 1982. “Frontiers of Narrative.” In Figures of Literary Discourse, trans. by Alan Sheridan, 127–144. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Dionysis Goutsos. 2000. “Revisiting Discourse Boundaries: The Narrative and Non-Narrative Modes.” TEXT 20 (1): 63–82.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 2015. Japanese: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ijima, Masahiro. 2010. “Noda bun no kinoo to koozoo [Functions and structures of noda sentences].” Nihongogaku Ronshū 61: 75–117.Google Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 2008. “Subjective Construal as a ‘Fashion of Speaking’ in Japanese.” In Current Trends in Contrastive Linguistics: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives, ed. by Maria de los Angeles Gomez Gonzalez, J. Lachlan Mackenzie, and Elsa M. Gonzalez Alvarez, 227–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iori, Isao. 2000. “Kyooiku bunpoo ni kansuru oboegaki: ‘Sukoopu no no da’ o ree to shite [Remarks on pedagogical grammar: With special reference to sukoopu-no noda’].” Hitotsubashi Daigaku Ryuugakusee Sentaa Kiyoo 31: 33–41.Google Scholar
Jorden, Eleanor Harz. 1963. Beginning Japanese. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jorden, Eleanor Harz, and Mari Noda. 1987. Japanese: The Spoken Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kudo, Mayumi. 1995. Asupekuto, Tensu Taikee to Tekusuto [Aspect, tense system and text]. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1983. Shin Nihon Bunpoo Kenkyuu [New Japan Grammar Research]. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Maekawa, Kikuo. 2008. Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Written Japanese. IJCNLP 2008: 101.Google Scholar
Makino, Seiichi, and Michio Tsutsui. 1986. A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar. Tokyo: The Japan Times.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko. K. 1992. “Cognitive and Pragmatic Messages of a Syntactic Choice: The Case of the Japanese Commentary Predicate n(o) da.” TEXT 121: 563–563.Google Scholar
McGloin, Naomi Hanaoka. 1980. “Some Observations Concerning no desu Expressions.” The Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese, 15 (2), 117–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. A Students’ Guide to Japanese Grammar. Tokyo: Taishukan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
McGloin, Naomi Hanaoka, Mutsuko Endo Hudson, Fumiko Nazikian, and Tomomi Kakegawa. 2013. Modern Japanese Grammar: A Practical Guide. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mikami, Aakira. 1953/1972. Gendai Gohoo Josetsu [Introduction to modern grammar]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Takaaki. 2018. “JCK sakubun koopasu ni okeru noda no tookatsu kinoo ni yoru bunmyaku tenkai no tokuchoo [Characteristics of text developments by the integrating function of noda in JCK essay corpus].” Chukyo Daigaku Bungakukai Ronso 41: 228–246.Google Scholar
Mori, Atsushi. 2011. “Nihongo kakikotoba kinkoo koopasu koa deeta ni okeru shokyuu bunpoo koomoku no shutsugen hindo [The frequency of elementary-level grammar items in the core data in the Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Written Japanese].” In Nihongo Kyooiku Bunpoo no Tame no Tayoo na Apuroochi [Multiple approaches to Japanese pedagogy grammar], ed. by Atsushi Mori, and Isao Iori, 57–78. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar
Nara, Hiroshi. 2011. “Aspect and Discourse in Tense-Switching: A Case Study of Natsume Sōseki’s Botchan.” Japanese Language and Literature 45 (1): 273–305.Google Scholar
Nishi, Hironori. 2017. “Japanese n deshita in Discourse: Past Form of n desu.” Acta Linguistica Asiatica 7 (1): 41–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noda, Harumi. 1992. “Fukubun ni okeru ‘no(da)’ no Kinoo: ‘no de wa naku(te),’ ‘no de wa,’ to ‘no daga’ [Functions of ‘no(da)’ in complex sentences: ‘no de wa naku(te)’ ‘no de wa’ and ‘no da kara’].” Handai Nihongo Kenkyuu 41: 73–90.Google Scholar
. 1999. No da no Kinoo [Functions of no da]. Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Ono, Hitomi. 2016. “Nanki hoogen ni okeru ‘no da’ sootoo keeshiki to ‘ta’ no kyooki [Co-occurrence of ‘no da’ in Nanki dialect and ‘ta’].” Language and Civilization 141: 85–90.Google Scholar
Rudrum, David. 2005. “From Narrative Representation to Narrative Use: Towards the Limits of Definition.” Narrative 13 (2), 195–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scholes, Robert. 1980. “Language, Narrative, and Anti-Narrative.” Critical Inquiry 7 (1): 204–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirakawa, Hiroyuki, Isao Iori, Shino Takanashi, Kumiko Nakanishi, and Toshihiro Yamada. 2001. Chuujookyuu o Oshieru Hito no Tame no Nihongo Bunpoo Handobukku [Grammar handbook for mid to upper-level Japanese language teachers]. Tokyo: 3A Network.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota. S. 2001. “Discourse Modes: Aspectual Entities and Tense Interpretation.” Cahiers de Grammaire 261, 183–206.Google Scholar
2003. Modes of Discourse: The Local Structure of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. “Aspectual Entities and Tense in Discourse.” Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 62 (2): 223–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soga, Matsuo. 1983. Tense and Aspect in Modern Colloquial Japanese. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Takatsu, Tamie. 1991. “A Unified Semantic Analysis of the NO DA Construction in Japanese.” The Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 25 (2): 167–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsujimura, Natsuko. 2007. An Introduction to Japanese Linguistics. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar