Introduction reframing framing
Interaction and the constitution of culture and society
This special issue revisits the notion of framing based on several recent developments in the fields of sociolinguistics, discourse analysis, and linguistic anthropology, particularly the current interest in the notions of stance, style, metalinguistics and language ideology. In doing so, the contributions highlight the importance of framing not only in the management of micro-level interactional practices but also in the reproduction of cultural ideologies and social relations.
References (41)
Agha, Asif (2007) Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bateson, Gregory (1972) A theory of play and fantasy. In Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company, pp. 177-193.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauman, Richard (1977) Verbal art as performance. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauman, Richard (2004) A world of others' words: Cross-cultural perspectives on intertextuality. Malden: Blackwell.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs (1990) Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 59-88.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Briggs, Charles L., and Richard Bauman (1992) Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2.2: 131-172.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 71: 585-614.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W. (2001) Towards a dialogic syntax. Ms., University of California, Santa Barbara.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W. (2007) The stance triangle. In Englebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 139–182. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, Penelope (2004) The meaning of style. In Wai Fong Chiang, Elaine Chun, Laura Mahalingappa, and Siri Mehus, (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium about Language and Society – Austin. Texas Linguistic Forum Vol. 471: 41–53.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, Penelope (2008) Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 121: 453-476. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, Penelope, and John R. Rickford (eds.) (2001) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gal, Susan, and Kathryn A. Woolard (eds.) (2001) Languages and publics: The making of authority. Manchester: St. Jerome. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving (1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gordon, Cynthia (2002) “I’m Mommy and you’re Natalie”: Role-reversal and embedded frames in mother–child discourse. Language in Society 311: 679–720. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gordon, Cynthia (2008) A(p)parent play: Blending frames and reframing in family talk. Language in Society 371: 319-349.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gumperz, John J. (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gumperz, John J. (1996) The linguistic and cultural relativity of conversational inference. In John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 374-406. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gumperz, John J. (2001) Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 215–228.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hill, Jane H. (2001) Mock Spanish, covert racism, and the (leaky) boundary between public and private spheres. In Susan Gal and Kathryn Woolard (eds.), Languages and publics: The making of authority. Manchester: St. Jerome, pp. 83-102.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hill, Jane H., and Judith T. Irvine (eds.) (1993) Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson (eds.) (2000) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.) (2009) Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. BoP ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaworski, Adam, Nikolas Coupland, and Dariusz Galasiński (eds.) (2004) Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.) (2000) Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kroskrity, Paul V. (2004) Language ideologies. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 496-517.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lempert, Michael. (2008) The poetics of stance: Text-metricality, epistemicity, interaction. Language in Society 371: 569-592. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lucy, John A. (ed.) (1993) Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rampton, Ben (ed.) (1999) Styling the other. Special issue of Journal of Sociolinguistics 3.4.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schieffelin, Bambi B., Kathryn A. Woolard, and Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.) (1998) Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverstein, Michael (1979) Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks, and Carol L. Hofbauer (eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 193-247.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverstein, Michael (1985) Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In Elizabeth Mertz and Richard Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives. Orlando: Academic Press, pp. 219-259. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverstein, Michael, and Greg Urban (eds.) (1996) Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah (ed.) (1993) Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah (2004) Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction 371: 399–420.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah (2006) Intertextuality in action: Reframing family arguments in public and private. Text & Talk 261: 597–617. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah, and Cynthia Wallat (1987) Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quarterly50.2: 205-216. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woolard, Kathryn A. (1998) Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard, and Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-47. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Loeng, Martin
2020.
Foreigners, fakes and flycatchers: stereotypes, social encounters and the problem of discomfort on the street in Arusha, Tanzania.
International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research 14:3
► pp. 401 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Biondo, Fabiana Poças
2015.
"Liberte-se dos rótulos": questões de gênero e sexualidade em práticas de letramento em comunidades ativistas do Facebook.
Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 15:1
► pp. 209 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Blyth, Carl & Dale A. Koike
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.