Article published In:
Reframing framing: Interaction and the constitution of culture and societyEdited by Hiroko Takanashi and Joseph Sung-Yul Park
[Pragmatics 21:2] 2011
► pp. 185–190
Edited by Hiroko Takanashi and Joseph Sung-Yul Park
[Pragmatics 21:2] 2011
► pp. 185–190
Introduction reframing framing
Interaction and the constitution of culture and society
This special issue revisits the notion of framing based on several recent developments in the fields of sociolinguistics, discourse analysis, and linguistic anthropology, particularly the current interest in the notions of stance, style, metalinguistics and language ideology. In doing so, the contributions highlight the importance of framing not only in the management of micro-level interactional practices but also in the reproduction of cultural ideologies and social relations.
Keywords: Style, Stance, Framing, Interaction, Language ideology
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References (41)
Agha, Asif (2007) Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bateson, Gregory (1972) A theory of play and fantasy. In Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company, pp. 177-193.
Bauman, Richard (1977) Verbal art as performance. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.
(2004) A world of others' words: Cross-cultural perspectives on intertextuality. Malden: Blackwell. 
BoP
BoPBauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs (1990) Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 59-88. BoP
BoPBriggs, Charles L., and Richard Bauman (1992) Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2.2: 131-172. BoP
BoPBucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 71: 585-614. BoP
BoPDu Bois, John W. (2001) Towards a dialogic syntax. Ms., University of California, Santa Barbara.
. (2007) The stance triangle. In Englebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 139–182.
Eckert, Penelope (2004) The meaning of style. In Wai Fong Chiang, Elaine Chun, Laura Mahalingappa, and Siri Mehus, (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium about Language and Society – Austin. Texas Linguistic Forum Vol. 471: 41–53.
(2008) Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 121: 453-476.
Eckert, Penelope, and John R. Rickford (eds.) (2001) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Englebretson, Robert (ed.) (2007) Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
BoPGal, Susan, and Kathryn A. Woolard (eds.) (2001) Languages and publics: The making of authority. Manchester: St. Jerome. BoP
Goffman, Erving (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. BoP
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. BoP
Gordon, Cynthia (2002) “I’m Mommy and you’re Natalie”: Role-reversal and embedded frames in mother–child discourse. Language in Society 311: 679–720.
(2008) A(p)parent play: Blending frames and reframing in family talk. Language in Society 371: 319-349. BoP
BoPGumperz, John J. (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoP. (1996) The linguistic and cultural relativity of conversational inference. In John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 374-406. BoP
. (2001) Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 215–228.
Hill, Jane H. (2001) Mock Spanish, covert racism, and the (leaky) boundary between public and private spheres. In Susan Gal and Kathryn Woolard (eds.), Languages and publics: The making of authority. Manchester: St. Jerome, pp. 83-102.
Hill, Jane H., and Judith T. Irvine (eds.) (1993) Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson (eds.) (2000) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP
Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.) (2009) Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. BoP
Jaworski, Adam, Nikolas Coupland, and Dariusz Galasiński (eds.) (2004) Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. BoP
BoPKroskrity, Paul V. (ed.) (2000) Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press. BoP
. (2004) Language ideologies. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 496-517.
Lempert, Michael. (2008) The poetics of stance: Text-metricality, epistemicity, interaction. Language in Society 371: 569-592.
Lucy, John A. (ed.) (1993) Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPOropeza-Escobar, M. (2011) Represented Discourse, Resonance and Stance in Joking Interaction in Mexican Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
BoPRampton, Ben (ed.) (1999) Styling the other. Special issue of Journal of Sociolinguistics 3.4. BoP
BoPSchieffelin, Bambi B., Kathryn A. Woolard, and Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.) (1998) Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP
Silverstein, Michael (1979) Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks, and Carol L. Hofbauer (eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 193-247.
(1985) Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In Elizabeth Mertz and Richard Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives. Orlando: Academic Press, pp. 219-259.
Silverstein, Michael, and Greg Urban (eds.) (1996) Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. BoP
Tannen, Deborah (ed.) (1993) Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press. BoP
(2004) Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction 371: 399–420. BoP
BoP (2006) Intertextuality in action: Reframing family arguments in public and private. Text & Talk 261: 597–617.
Tannen, Deborah, and Cynthia Wallat (1987) Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quarterly50.2: 205-216.
Woolard, Kathryn A. (1998) Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard, and Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-47. BoP
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Loeng, Martin
2020. Foreigners, fakes and flycatchers: stereotypes, social encounters and the problem of discomfort on the street in Arusha, Tanzania. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research 14:3 ► pp. 401 ff. 
Biondo, Fabiana Poças
2015. "Liberte-se dos rótulos": questões de gênero e sexualidade em práticas de letramento em comunidades ativistas do Facebook. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 15:1 ► pp. 209 ff.
Blyth, Carl & Dale A. Koike
2014. Interactional frames and grammatical constructions. In Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 244], ► pp. 87 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.