Article published in:Reframing framing: Interaction and the constitution of culture and society
Edited by Hiroko Takanashi and Joseph Sung-Yul Park
[Pragmatics 21:2] 2011
► pp. 265–282
Framing, stance, and affect in Korean metalinguistic discourse
Studies on language and affect have identified displays of emotions and feelings as important means through which speakers negotiate their social relations and cultural positions. Extending the findings of those studies, this paper discusses how affect must be seen as an important building block for framing, a resource that allows participants to construct frames that have specific grounding in identifiable social meaning. I make this point by illustrating how interactional management of affect contributes to the constitution of frames via the work of stancetaking, based on a discussion of several examples from a specific discursive context - Koreans’ metalinguistic talk about English. While Koreans are commonly known to show much ‘anxiety’ or ‘uneasiness’ about their own English language skills, I demonstrate that such display of affect may be understood as part of an interactional frame for speaking (about) English that allows speakers to position themselves in relation to English and to each other in a culturally and socially appropriate way. The analysis shows that the semiotic resources that speakers employ in their affective displays allow participants to negotiate specific stances that they should take, and to jointly construct a frame for interpreting the interactional import of the ongoing talk.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 June 2011
(1990) Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 419-451. BoP
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolino
(ed.) (2007) Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
(1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. BoP
(1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. BoP
Hill, Jane H., and Judith T. Irvine
Horwitz, Elaine K., Michael B. Horwitz, and Jo Ann Cope
Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson
(eds.) (2000) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP
(ed.) (2009) Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. BoP
(2003) Relationship between student anxiety and corrective feedback: Case of Korean college-level EFL learners. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Kim, Seung Jung
(2004) Exploring willingness to communicate (WTC) in English among Korean EFL students in Korea: WTC as a predictor of success in second language acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
Kulick, Don, and Bambi B. Schieffelin
Lutz, Catherine, and Lila Abu-Lughod
(eds.) (1990) Language and the Politics of Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Lutz, Catherine, and G. White
MacIntyre, Peter D., Richard Clément, Zoltán Dörnyei, and Kimberly A. Noels
Ochs, Elinor, and Bambi B. Schieffelin
(1989) Language has a heart. Text 9.1: 7-25. BoP
(1995) Language learning strategies and beliefs about language learning of university students learning English in Korea. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, TX.
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul
(2009) The Local Construction of a Global Language: Ideologies of English in South Korea. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. BoP
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 531: 361-382. BoP
Tannen, Deborah, and Cynthia Wallat
Truitt, Susan N
(1995) Anxiety and beliefs about language learning: A study of Korean university students learning English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, TX.
Cited by 10 other publications
Blyth, Carl & Dale A. Koike
Chiluwa, Innocent & Presley Ifukor
de Bres, Julia & Veronika Lovrits
Sultana, Shaila & Brook Bolander
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.