Ordering burgers, reordering relations
Gestural interactions between hearing and d/Deaf Nepalis
This article analyzes gestural interactions between hearing and d/Deaf Nepalis to argue that local understandings of the consequences of these engagements make visible ways of ideologizing gesture that may be obscured by the gestural typologies widely used by scholars. In Nepal, d/Deafness is associated with ritual pollution that can be shared across persons. Consequently, the use of gesture in a communicative interaction can both presuppose the presence of a polluted d/Deaf body and creatively index the transmission of that pollution to a hearing interlocutor. By the same token, gesturally engaging with Deaf persons can index “modern” rejection of belief in ritual pollution on the part of the hearing participant. While many scholarly typologies of gesture focus on form and decontextualized reference, the pragmatic effects of gesture derived from and contributing to differently positioned personhoods are more significant in local ideologies in Nepal.
Keywords: Gesture, d/Deaf, Nepal, Personhood
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 September 2011
(1997) Erika Hoffmann & Dambar Chemjong (trans. 2004) A History of the Deaf in Nepal. Unpublished manuscript. Kathmandu: National Association of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing.
Duranti, Alessandro, and Charles Goodwin
(eds.) (1992) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactional Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Ekman, Paul, and Wallace Friesen
Fürer-Haimendorf, Christoph von
(2008) Standardization beyond form: Ideologies, institutions, and the semiotics of Nepali sign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: The University of Michigan.
Irvine, Judith, and Susan Gal
(2003) Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Language and Communication 23.3-4: 409-425. BoP
(1995) Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 23.3: 247-279. BoP
(2008) Some reflections on the relationship between ‘gesture’ and ‘sign’. Gesture 8.3: 348-366. BoP
Marriott, McKim, and Ronald B. Inden
Mines, Diane, and Sarah Lamb
Morris, Desmond, Peter Collett, Peter Marsh, and Marie O'Shaughnessy
Ness, Sally Ann
(2002) A modality free notion of gesture and how it can help us with the morpheme vs. gesture question in sign language linguistics (or at least give us some criteria to work with). In R. Meier, K. Cormier, and D. Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 175-198.
Prasad, Laxmi Narayan
Cited by 5 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.