Article published In:
PragmaticsVol. 32:4 (2022) ► pp.562–587
Picking fights with politicians
Categories, partitioning and the achievement of antagonism
In 2016 the UK held a divisive referendum on its membership of the European Union. In the aftermath, difference and division were rife in politics and in everyday life. This article explores how such difference and division play out in and through interaction through examining a citizen ‘picking a fight’ with a politician over how Brexit has been handled. Drawing on membership categorisation analysis we show how antagonism is interactionally accomplished. The analysis focuses on three categorial strategies which interlocutors use to achieve antagonism: establishing omnirelevant devices, categories and their predicates; explicitly challenging category membership; and partitioning a population. Beyond offering insights into moments of social life that are not easily captured, the findings contribute to an empirical conceptualisation of antagonism and illustrate how membership categorisation analysis can shed light on its interactional achievement.
Keywords: antagonism, membership categorisation analysis, conflict, Brexit, social interaction, political discourse
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1Contesting Brexit in language
- 2.2Membership categorisation analysis
- 2.3Categories in political encounters
- 2.4Antagonism
- 3.Data and method
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Establishing omnirelevant devices, categories and their predicates
- 4.2Challenging category membership
- 4.3Creating ingroup and outgroup through partitioning
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Abrams, Dominic, and Giovanni A. Travaglino
2018 “Immigration, Political Trust, and Brexit-Testing an Aversion Amplification Hypothesis.” British Journal of Social Psychology 57 (2): 310–326. 
Bowman, Jonathan W. P., and Keon West
2020 “Brexit: The Influence of Motivation to Respond without Prejudice, Willingness to Disagree, and Attitudes to Immigration.” British Journal of Social Psychology 60 (1): 222–247.
Bull, Peter, and Will Strawson
2019 “Can’t Answer? Won’t Answer? An Analysis of Equivocal Responses by Theresa May in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Parliamentary Affairs 73 (2): 429–449.
Butler, Carly W., Richard Fitzgerald, and Rod Gardner
2009 “Branching Out: Ethnomethodological Approaches to Communication.” Australian Journal of Communication 36 (3): 1–14.
Clarke, Harold D., Matthew Goodwin, and Paul Whiteley
2017 Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clarke, John, and Janet Newman
2019 “What’s the Subject? Brexit and Politics as Articulation.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 29 (1): 67–77.
Clift, Rebecca, and Marco Pino
2020 “Turning the Tables: Objecting to Conduct in Conflict Talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 53 (4): 463–480.
Clifton, Jonathan
2009 “A Membership Categorization Analysis of the Waco Siege: Perpetrator-Victim Identity as a Moral Discrepancy Device for ‘Doing’ Subversion.” Sociological Research Online 14 (5): 38–48.
Coupland, Nikolas
2003 “Sociolinguistic Authenticities.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 7 (3): 417–431.
Cromdal, Jakob
2004 “Building Bilingual Oppositions: Code-Switching in Children’s Disputes.” Language in Society 33 (1): 33–58.
D’Hondt, Sigurd
2013 “Analyzing Equivalences in Discourse: Are Discourse Theory and Membership Categorization Analysis Compatible?” Pragmatics 23 (3): 421–445.
Demasi, Mirko A.
2019 “Facts as Social Action in Political Debates about the European Union.” Political Psychology 40 (1): 3–20.
Dersley, Ian, and Anthony Wootton
2000 “Complaint Sequences within Antagonistic Argument.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 331: 375–406.
Eglin, Peter, and and Stephen Hester
1992 “Category, Predicate and Task: The Pragmatics of Practical Action.” Semiotica 88 (3–4): 243–268.
Eglin, Peter, and Stephen Hester
1999 ““You’re All a Bunch of Feminists”: Categorization and the Politics of Terror in the Montreal Massacre.” Human Studies 22 (2–4): 253–272.
2003 The Montreal Massacre: A Story of Membership Categorization Analysis. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Fitzgerald, Richard, William Housley, and Carly W. Butler
2009 “Omnirelevance and Interactional Context.” Australian Journal of Communication 36 (3): 45–64.
Fitzgerald, Richard, and Joanna Thornborrow
2017 “ ‘I’m a Scouser’: Membership Categories and Political Geography in the 2016 UK Election Call Phone-in”. Journal of Language and Politics 16 (1): 40–58.
Francis, David, and Sally Hester
2017 “Stephen Hester on the Problem of Culturalism.” Journal of Pragmatics 1181: 56–63.
Goffman, Erving
1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-face Behaviour. Chicago: Aldine.
Hänska-Ahy, Max, and Stefan Bauchowitz
2017 Tweeting for Brexit: How Social Media Influenced the Referendum. In Brexit, Trump and the Media, ed. by J. Mair, T. Clark, N. Fowler, R. Snoddy, and R. Tait. 31–35. Suffolk: Abramis Academic Publishing.
Hardaker, Claire
2010 “Trolling in Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication: From User Discussions to Academic Definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research 6 (2): 215–242.
Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
1997a Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.
1997b “Membership Categorization Analysis: An Introduction.” In Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. by Stephen Hester, and Peter Eglin. 1–23. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.
Hofstetter, Emily, and Elizabeth H. Stokoe
2015 “Offers of Assistance in Politician-Constituent Interaction.” Discourse Studies 17 (6): 724–751.
2018 “Getting Service at the Constituency Office: Analyzing Citizens’ Encounters with their Member of Parliament.” Text & Talk 38 (5): 551–573.
Housley, William, and Richard Fitzgerald
2002 “The Reconsidered Model of Membership Categorization Analysis.” Qualitative Research 2 (1): 59–83.
Housley, William
2002 “Moral Discrepancy and ‘Fudging the Issue’ in a Radio News Interview.” Sociology 36 (1): 5–21.
Housley, William, and Richard Fitzgerald
2003 “Moral Discrepancy and Political Discourse: Accountability and the Allocation of Blame in a Political News Interview.” Sociological Research Online 8 (2): 18–26.
Housley, William, Helena Webb, Adam Edwards, Rob Procter, and Marina Jirotka
2017 “Digitizing Sacks? Approaching Social Media as Data.” Qualitative Research 17 (6): 627–644.
Jayyusi, Lena
1984 Categorization and the Moral Order. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Joyce, Jack B., Bogdana Humă, Hanna-Leena Ristimäki, Fabio Ferraz de Almeida, and Ann Doehring
2021 “Speaking out Against Everyday Sexism: Gender and Epistemics in Accusations of “Mansplaining”.” Feminism & Psychology 30 (4): 502–529.
Joyce, Jack B., and Linda Walz
2021 Picking Fights with Politicians Dataset.
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2018 “Social Media in/and the Politics of the European Union: Politico-Organizational Communication, Institutional Cultures and Self-Inflicted Elitism.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (2): 243–266.
Leudar, Ivan, Victoria Marsland, and Jirí Nekvapil
2004 “On Membership Categorization: ‘Us’, ‘Them’, and ‘Doing Violence’ in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 15 (2–3): 243–266.
Meredith, Joanne, and Emma Richardson
2019 “The Use of the Political Categories of Brexiter and Remainer in Online Comments about the EU referendum.” Community and Applied Social Psychology 29 (1): 43–55.
Nishizaka, Aug
2021 “Partitioning a Population in Agreement and Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics 1721: 225–238.
O’Driscoll, Jim, and Leslie Jeffries
2019 “Introduction: The Origins of The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, ed. by M. Evans, L. Jeffries, and J. O’Driscoll. 1–9. New York: Routledge.
Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage
2006 “The Epistemics of Social Relationships: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society 35 (5): 677–705.
Reynolds, Edward
2011 “Enticing a Challengeable in Arguments: Sequence, Epistemics and Preference Organisation.” Pragmatics 21 (3): 411–430.
2015 “How Participants in Arguments Challenge the Normative Position of an Opponent.” Discourse Studies 17 (3): 299–316.
Robles, Jessica S.
2011 “Doing Disagreement in the House of Lords: ‘Talking around the Issue’ as a Context-Appropriate Argumentative Strategy.” Discourse & Communication 5 (2): 147–168.
Robles, Jessica S., and Theresa Castor
2019 “Taking the Moral High Ground: Practices for Being Uncompromisingly Principled.” Journal of Pragmatics 1411: 115–129.
Sacks, Harvey
1984 “On Doing “Being Ordinary”.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage. 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1995 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stokoe, Elizabeth H.
2003 “Mothers, Single Women and Sluts: Gender, Morality and Membership Categorization in Neighbour Disputes.” Feminism and Psychology 13 (3): 317–344.
Tainio, Liisa
2003 “ ‘When Shall We Go for a Ride?’ A Case of the Sexual Harassment of a Young Girl.” Discourse & Society 14 (2): 173–190.
Van Schepen, Nynke
2019 “Political Transparency Matters: Citizens Challenging Officials via ‘Have You Planned X’-Type Questions.” Discourse & Society 30 (5): 521–535.
Walz, Linda, and Richard Fitzgerald
2020 “A Stranger in a Foreign Land: Identity Transition in Blogs about Transnational Relocation.” Discourse, Context & Media 361: 1–9.
Widdicombe, Sue, and Robin Wooffitt
1990 “ ‘Being’ versus ‘Doing’ Punk: On Achieving Authenticity as a Member.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9 (4): 257–277.