‘No’-prefacing in estonian
Negative polar particles have generally been characterized as items for expressing disagreement or responding negatively to polar questions. What has been lacking in these accounts is attention to embodied activities. This paper studies the usage of the Estonian negative particle ei as a preface in realtime activities, showing that it halts the ongoing action, often for the sake of achieving intersubjective understanding and establishing epistemic authority. The paper shows how other matters besides logic and truth-conditions define the meaning of the negative particle. Analysis of linguistic function demands transgressing the boundaries of language and scrutiny of co-present interaction in its temporal emergence. The paper argues that several discourse functions of ei are also more accurately described from the vantage point of its usage in multimodal face-to-face settings than from the logical properties that the item happens to display in limited sequential contexts after yes/no interrogatives.
Keywords: Estonian, Negative polar particle, Epistemic authority, Progressivity, Conversation analysis, Interactional linguistics, Epistemic primacy
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 March 2012
Ford, Cecilia E.
Ford, Cecilia, E., Barbara A. Fox, and John Hellermann
(2004) “Getting past no”: Sequence, action and sound production in the projection of no-initiated turns. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Cecilia E. Ford (eds.), Sound Patterns in Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 233–269. BoP
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. BoP
Golato, Andrea, and Zsuzsanna Fagyal
(2008) Comparing single and double sayings of the German response token ja and the role of prosody: A conversation analytic perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41.3: 241–270. BoP
Haakana, Markku, and Salla Kurhila
Haakana, Markku, and Laura Visapää
(2010) Expanding the scope of repair: Finnish eiku in action. Paper presented at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis 2010 , Mannheim, July 4–8.
(1984a) A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson, and John C. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–345. BoP
(1998) Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society 27.3: 291–334. BoP
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
(1994) Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society 23.1: 1–29. BoP
Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie
(2010) “Ani”-prefacing: Indexing “Why I Said That”. Paper presented at International Conference on Conversation Analysis 2010 , Mannheim, July 4–8.
Lerner, Gene, and Celia Kitzinger
(2010) Repair prefacing in the organization of same-turn self-repair. Paper presented at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis 2010 , Mannheim, July 4–8.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53.2: 361–382. BoP
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
(2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
(1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, and Minna Laakso
(2005) Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38.2: 131–158. BoP
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig
Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey D. Robinson
(2006) A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society 35.3: 367–392. BoP
(2004) Using and in Conversational Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37.2: 219–261. BoP
Cited by 17 other publications
Hayashi, Makoto & Kaoru Hayano
Hayashi, Makoto & Shuya Kushida
Hofstetter, Emily & Leelo Keevallik
Kim, Stephanie Hyeri
Laanesoo, Kirsi & Leelo Keevallik
Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen, Veronika Drake, Andrea Golato & Emma Betz
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.