Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 34:2 (2024) ► pp.161–189

Delving into suggestion speech acts in Chinese authoritative academic discourse

A cognitive pragmatic perspective

ORCID logo | Dalian University of Foreign Languages
ORCID logo | Dalian University of Technology
This paper aims to examine the realisation of suggestions in authoritative academic discourse through the lens of cognitive pragmatics. To date, the majority of academic suggestion research has focused on face-to-face interactions in an institutional context. However, other forms of suggesting, namely the written forms of academic suggestions have not yet been sufficiently explored. Thus, there is a knowledge gap when it comes to authoritative academic suggestions directed to policy makers. Such policy maker-directed suggestions are always bound and embedded in particular cultural contexts. As a case study, we explore the suggestions in authoritative academic discourse with the focus on illocutionary force indicating devices (IFIDs) and relevant construal strategies. Our data were drawn from the Blue Book of Ecological Governance (China Ecological Governance development report 2019–2020), an important manifestation of authoritative academic discourse in China. The findings indicate that three types of IFIDs are deployed to delimit Chinese authoritative academic suggestions, among which conventionalised and indirect IFIDs are preferred. Notably IFID tools pertain to speakers’ choices of construal strategies for building up the infrastructure of suggestions. The operation of these strategies reveals how authoritative academic suggestions are internally coded, as well as how they are built to externally act on. Furthermore, we argue that the speakers’ choices of construal strategies imply a degree of politeness. The study may shed light upon speech act and politeness research in Chinese linguaculture.
Keywords: suggestions, politeness, authoritative academic discourse, cognitive pragmatics, China
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Suggestions
    • 2.2Academic suggestions
    • 2.3Pragmatic strategies
  • 3.Analytic framework
  • 4.Data and method
    • 4.1Data
    • 4.2Method
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1IFIDs
    • 5.2The construal strategies
      • 5.2.1Explicitness
      • 5.2.2Perspectivity
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 15 May 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22022.li
References (68)
References
Alston, William P. 1994. “Illocutionary Acts and Linguistic Meaning.” In Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by Savas L. Tsohatzidis, 29–49. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Austin, Paddy. 1990. “Politeness Revisited – The Dark Side.” In New Zealand Ways of Speaking English, ed. by Allan Bell, and Janet Holmes, 277–293. Clevedon/Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Janet, and Patricia L. Carrell. 1988. “Tuck in Your Shirt, You Squid: Suggestions in ESL.” Language Learning 38 (3): 313–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen, and Beverly S. Hartford. 1996. “Input in an Institutional Setting.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18 (2): 171–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnahan, Mary. 1992. “The Effects of Advisor Style on Overcoming Client Resistance in the Advising Interview”. Discourse Processes 15 (2): 229–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Johan. 2018. “Economic Knowledge and the Scientization of Policy Advice.” Policy Sciences 51 (3): 291–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeCapua, Andrea, and Joan Findlay Dunham. 2012. “‘It Wouldn’t Hurt If You Had Your Child Evaluated’: Advice to Mothers in Responses.” In Advice in Discourse, ed. by Miriam A. Locher, and Holger Limberg, 73–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeCapua, Andrea, and Lisa Huber. 1995. “‘If I Were You…’: Advice in American English.” Multilingua 14 (2): 117–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinsmore, John. 1991. Partitioned Representations. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspect of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Reprinted 1994, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 1980. “Spilling the Beans on Understanding and Memory for Idioms in Conversation.” Memory & Cognition 8 (2): 149–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillingham, Philip. 2019. “From Bureaucracy to Technocracy in a Social Welfare Agency: A Cautionary Tale.” Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development 29 (2): 108–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gizzi, Michael C., and Stefan Rädiker, eds. 2021. The Practice of Qualitative Data Analysis: Research Examples Using MAXQDA. Berlin: MAXQDA Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Daena J. 2004. Communicating Social Support. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Daena J., and Kristine Fitch. 1997. “The Normative Context of Advice as Social Support.” Human Communication Research 23 (4): 454–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gu, Edward, and Merle Goldman. 2004. “Introduction: The Transformation of the Relationship between Chinese Intellectuals and the State.” In Chinese Intellectuals between State and Market, ed. by Edward X. Gu, and Merle Goldman, 1–18. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graumann, Carl F., and Michael C. Sommer. 1988. “Perspective Structure in Language Production and Comprehension.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 7 (3–4): 193–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, Willis J., and Juliane House. 1981. Let’s Talk, and Talk about It: A Pedagogic Interactional Grammar of English. München: Urban & Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Hámori, Ágnes. 2010. “Illocutionary Force, Salience and Attention Management – A Social Cognitive Pragmatic Perspective.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57 (1): 53–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
He, Shanhua, and Tiaoyuan Mao. 2020. “Can the Research on Language Planning Be Also Planned?: Recent Academia-Government Interactions In China.” Current Issues in Language Planning 21 (4): 434–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henricson, Sofie, and Marie Nelson. 2017. “Giving and Receiving Advice in Higher Education. Comparing Sweden-Swedish and Finland-Swedish Supervision Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics 1091: 105–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higuchi, Koichi. 2016. KH Coder 3 Reference Manual. Kioto (Japan): Ritsumeikan University.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Academic Discourse.” In Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ken Hyland, and Brian Paltridge, 171–184. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Fiona Hyland. 2012. “‘You Could Make This Clearer’: Teachers’ Advice on ESL Academic Writing.” In Advice in Discourse, ed. by Miriam A. Locher, and Holger Limberg, 53–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Peter M. 2007. “Making Sense of Policy Advice.” Public Money and Management 27 (4): 257–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuckartz, Udo. 2014. Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice and Using Software. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. “Subjectification.” Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1): 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Concept, Image and Symbol. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2001. “Discourse in Cognitive Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics 12 (2): 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Eden Sum-hung. 2010. “Making Suggestions: A Contrastive Study of Young Hong Kong and Australian Students.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (3): 598–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Qun, and Fawen Yu. 2019. Blue Book of Ecological Governance. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
Limberg, Holger. 2010. The Interactional Organization of Academic Talk: Office Hour Consultations. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Fengguang, Shi, Wenrui, and Yaochen Deng. 2019. “A Contrastive Study of Chinese and American Political Speech Act of Advising – Taking Diplomatic Discourse as an Example.” Foreign Language Education 401: 44–50.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. 2006. Advice Online. Advice-giving in an American Internet Health Column. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana I. 2011. “Epistemic Legitimizing Strategies, Commitment and Accountability in Discourse.” Discourse Studies 13 (6): 789–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Flor, Alicia. 2005. “A Theoretical Review of the Speech Act of Suggesting: Towards a Taxonomy for Its Use in FLT.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 181: 167–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 1993. “Epistemic Modal Adverbs and Adjectives and the Layered Representation of Conceptual and Linguistic Structure.” Linguistics 31 (5): 933–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “The Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach.” Intercultural Pragmatics 1 (1): 135–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna. 2000. “On Speech-Act Modality.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (5): 519–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pattyn, Valérie, Sonja Blum, Ellen Fobé, Mirjam Pekar-Milicevic, and Marleen Brans. 2022. “Academic Policy Advice in Consensus-Seeking Countries: The Cases of Belgium and Germany.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 88 (1): 26–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher. 2006. “Academic Advice to Practitioners – What Is Its Nature, Place and Value Within Academia?” Public Money and Management 26 (4): 257–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, José, and Gisela Redeker. 1996. “Perspective and the Representation of Speech and Thought in Narrative Discourse.” In Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar, ed. by Gilles Fauconnier, and Eve Sweetser, 290–317. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, José, and Wilbert Spooren. 1997. “Perspective, Subjectivity, and Modality from a Cognitive Linguistic Point of View.” In Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Wolf-Andreas Liebert, Gisela Redeker, and Linda R. Waugh. Amsterdam: John Benjamins publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2001. “Illocutionary Force and Degrees of Strength in Language Use.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (12): 1791–1814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2012. Cognitive Pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1976. “The Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5 (1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharoff, Serge, Reinhard Rapp, Pierre Zweigenbaum, and Pascale Fung. 2013. Building and Using Comparable Corpora. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stadler, Stefanie Alexa. 2011. “Coding Speech Acts for Their Degree of Explicitness.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (1): 36–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, Naoko, Loretta Fernández, and Yuechun Jiang. 2021. “Systemic Functional Linguistics Applied to Analyze L2 Speech Acts: Analysis of Advice-giving in a Written Text.” In New Directions in Second Language Pragmatics, ed. by J. César Félix-Brasdefer, and Rachel L. Shively, 27–57. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 12 (1): 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1977. “Pragmatic Macro-structures in Discourse and Cognition.” Retrieved from: [URL]
Vehviläinen, Sanna. 2009. “Student-initiated Advice in Academic Supervision.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (2): 163–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2007. “Construal and Perspectivisation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 48–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weisser, Martin. 2010. “Annotating Dialogue Corpora Semi-automatically: A Corpus-linguistic Approach to Pragmatics.” Unpublished Post-doctoral Dissertation, University of Bayreuth.
Wiebe, Janyce. 1990. “Identifying Subjective Characters in Narrative.” In Proceedings of COLING 90, 401–406. Retrieved from: [URL]. DOI logo
Wu, Shuqiong, and Jing Huo. 2016. “A Cognitive Research of No-Subject Sentences in Chinese Legislative Texts.” Foreign Language and Literature Studies 331: 266–271.Google Scholar
Zha, Qiang. 2012. “Intellectuals, Academic Freedom, and University Autonomy in China.” In University Governance and Reform. Policy, Fads, and Experience in International Perspective, ed. by Hans G. Schuetze, William Bruneau, and Garnet Grosjean, 209–224. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Shouhui, and Guowen Shang. 2016. “Language Planning Agency in China: From the Perspective of the Language Academies.” Current Issues in Language Planning 17 (1): 23–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar