Concepts and context in relevance-theoretic pragmatics
New developments
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Relevance, meaning, and understanding
- 3.Concepts in relevance-theoretic pragmatics
- 4.Context in relevance-theoretic pragmatics
- 5.Conclusion
-
References
References
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
1983 “
Ad Hoc Categories.”
Memory & Cognition 111: 211–227.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blakemore, Diane
1987 Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blakemore, Diane
1992 Understanding Utterances. An Introduction to Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blakemore, Diane
2002 Relevance and Linguistic Meaning. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, Robyn
1997 “
Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary Processes in Deriving the Proposition Expressed.”
Linguistiche Berichte 81: 103–127.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, Robyn
2000 “
Explicature and Semantics.”
UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 121: 1–44.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, Robyn
2002a Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, Robyn
2002b “
Metaphor, Ad Hoc Concepts and Word Meaning – More Questions than Answers.”
UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 141: 83–105.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, Robyn
2010 “
Lexical Pragmatics, Ad Hoc Concepts and Metaphor: From a Relevance Theory Perspective.”
Italian Journal of Linguistics 22 (1): 153–180.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, Robyn
2012 “
Metaphor and the Literal/Nonliteral Distinction.” In
The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by
Keith Allan, and
Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 469–492. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, Robyn
2013 “
Word Meaning, What Is Said and Explicature.” In
What Is Said and What Is Not, ed. by
Carlo Penco, and
Filippo Domaneschi, 175–204. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, Robyn
2016 “
The Heterogeneity of Procedural Meaning.”
Lingua 175–1761: 154–166.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, Robyn, and Catherine Wearing
2011 “
Metaphor, Hyperbole and Simile: A Pragmatic Approach.”
Language and Cognition 3 (2): 283–312.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Saussure, Louis
2012 “
Temporal Reference in Discourse.” In
The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by
Keith Allan, and
Kasia Jaszczolt, 423–446. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Falkum, Ingrid L.
2019 “
Metaphor and Metonymy in Acquisition: A Relevance Theoretic Perspective.” In
Relevance: Pragmatics and Interpretation, ed. by
Kate Scott,
Robyn Carston, and
Billy Clark, 205–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fodor, Jerry A.
1983 The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, Herbert P.
1975 “
Logic and Conversation.” In
Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts, ed. by
Peter Cole, and
Jerry Morgan, 41–59. New York: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grisot, Cristina, Bruno Cartoni, and Jacques Moeschler
Hall, Alison
2007 “
Do Discourse Connectives Encode Concepts or Procedures?”
Lingua 117 (1): 149–174.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hall, Alison
2011 “
Ad Hoc Concepts: Atomic or Decompositional.”
UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 231: 1–10.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hall, Alison
2017 “
Lexical Pragmatics, Explicature and Ad Hoc Concepts.” In
Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line, ed. by
Ilse Depraetere, and
Raphael Salkie, 55–100. Cham: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jary, Mark
2016 “
Rethinking Explicit Utterance Content.”
Journal of Pragmatics 1021: 24–37.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jucker, Andreas H.
1993 “
The Discourse Marker Well: A Relevance-theoretical Account.”
Journal of Pragmatics 19 (5): 435–452.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moeschler, Jacques
2016 “
Where Is Procedural Meaning Located? Evidence from Discourse Connectives and Tenses.”
Lingua 175–1761: 122–138.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2020 “
Towards a Relevance-Theoretic Approach to the Diminutive Morpheme.”
Russian Journal of Linguistics 24 (4): 774–795.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2022a “
Is Free Enrichment Always Free? Revisiting Ad Hoc-Concept Construction.”
Journal of Pragmatics 1871: 130–143.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scott, Kate
2011 “
Beyond Reference: Concepts, Procedures and Referring Expressions.” In
Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, ed. by
Victoria Escandell Vidal,
Manuel Leonetti, and
Aoife Ahern, 183–203. Bingley: Emerald.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scott, Kate
2013 “
This and That: A Procedural Analysis.”
Lingua 1311: 49–65.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scott, Kate
2016 “
Pronouns and Procedures: Reference and Beyond.”
Lingua 175–1761: 69–82.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1986 Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995 Relevance. Communication and Cognition, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1998 “
The Mapping between the Mental and the Public Lexicon.” In
Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes, ed. by
Peter Carruthers, and
Jill Boucher, 184–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
2008 “
A Deflationary Account of Metaphors.” In
The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ed. by
Raymond W. Gibbs, 84–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wałaszeska, Ewa
2011 “
Broadening and Narrowing in Lexical Development: How Relevance Theory Can Account for Children’s Overextensions and Underextensions.”
Journal of Pragmatics 43 (1): 314–326.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Deirdre
2004 “
Relevance and Lexical Pragmatics.”
UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 161: 343–360.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Deirdre
2011a “
Procedural Meaning: Past, Present, Future.” In
Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, ed. by
Victoria Escandell Vidal,
Manuel Leonetti, and
Aoife Ahern, 3–31. Bingley: Emerald.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Deirdre
2011b “
Parallels and Differences in the Treatment of Metaphor in Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics.”
Intercultural Pragmatics 8 (2): 177–196.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Deirdre
2012 “
Modality and the Conceptual–Procedural Distinction.” In
Relevance Theory: More than Understanding, ed. by
Ewa Wałaszewska, and
Agnieszka Piskorska, 23–43. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston
2006 “
Metaphor, Relevance and the ‘Emergent Property’ Issue.”
Mind & Language 21 (3): 404–433.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston
2007 “
A Unitary Approach to Lexical Pragmatics: Relevance, Inference and Ad Hoc Concepts.” In
Pragmatics, ed. by
Noel Burton-Roberts, 230–259. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Deirdre
2016 “
Reassessing the Conceptual-Procedural Distinction.”
Lingua 175–1761: 5–19.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
1993 “
Linguistic Form and Relevance.”
Lingua 90 (1): 1–25.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
2002 “
Relevance Theory.”
UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 141: 249–287.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
2004 “
Relevance Theory.” In
The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by
Larry Horn, and
Gregory Ward, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
2012 Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)