Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 23:1 (2013) ► pp.5167
References
Bolivar, Adriana
(1999) The linguistic pragmatics of political pronouns in Venezuelan Spanish. In J. Verschueren (ed.), Selected Papers (Vol. 1) From the 6th International Pragmatics Conference.Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association, pp. 56-69.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer
(2006) Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews. Text & Talk 26.1: 3-37.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun
(2006) Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society 17.2: 359-383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Education Commission
(2005) Report on Review of Medium of Instruction for Secondary Schools and Secondary School Places Allocation. Hong Kong: Printing Department.Google Scholar
Education Bureau, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government
(2009) Education Bureau Circular No. 6/(2009) Fine-tuning the medium of instruction for secondary schools.
Education Commission, Hong Kong Government
(1990) Report No. 4: The Curriculum and Behavioral Problems in Schools. Hong Kong: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Education Department
(1997) Medium of Instruction: Guidance for Secondary Schools. Hong Kong: Printing Department.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
(1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1993) Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society 4.2: 133-168. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Peter Bull
Givón, Talmy
(1976) Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In C. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 149-188.Google Scholar
Goffman, Ervin
(1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael, and Christian Matthiessen
(2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Ho, Victor
(2010a) Constructing identities in the workplace through request e-mail discourse – how does one benefit from it? GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 10.2: 3 – 18.Google Scholar
(2010b) Constructing identities through request e-mail discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2253 – 2261. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress
(1988) Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hong Kong Government
(1965) Education Policy. Hong Kong: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Inigo-Mora, Isabel
(2004) On the use of the personal pronoun we in communities. Journal of Language and Politics 3.1: 27-52. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kamio, Akio
(1994) The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 211: 67-100. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2001) English generic we, you and they: An analysis in terms of territory of information. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 1111-1124. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Marsch, R, and J. Sampson
(1963) Report of Education Commission. Hong Kong: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair
(1994) The politics of pronouns. ELTJ 48.2: 173–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Proctor, Katarzyna, and Lily Su
(2011) The 1st person plural in political discourse - American politicians in interviews and in a debate. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3251-3266. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Pyykkő, Riitta
(2002) Who is ‘us’ in Russian political discourse. In A. Duszak (ed.), Us and others: Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 233-238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reyes-Rodríguez, Antonio
(2008) Discursive strategies in Chavez's political discourse: Voicing, distancing, and shifting. Critical Discourse Studies 5.2: 133-152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teo, Peter
Wilson, John
(1990) Politically Speaking. Oxford: Blackwells.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Andrew, and David Zeitlyn
(1995) The distribution of person-referring expressions in natural conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 28.1: 61–92. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Zupnik, Yael
(1994) A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 211: 339–383. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Furko, Peter
2017. Manipulative uses of pragmatic markers in political discourse. Palgrave Communications 3:1 DOI logo
Furkó, Péter B.
2020. Discourse Markers from a Critical Perspective: Some Theoretical Issues. In Discourse Markers and Beyond,  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Millar, Sharon
2015. Chapter 3. Under fire. In Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 63],  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Zahrah, Fatima, Jason R. C. Nurse & Michael Goldsmith
2020. 2020 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW),  pp. 438 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.