This paper discusses how the first person pronouns ‘I’ and ‘We’ and the two proper nouns ‘the Education Bureau [EDB]’ and ‘the Government’ were used strategically by government officials in an attempt to delineate the level of involvement and commitment of the officials themselves, the EDB and the Hong Kong Government in the course of implementing and fine-tuning the medium-of-instruction policy in Hong Kong’s secondary schools. The data comprises the speeches delivered at various formal educational occasions and the documents issued and distributed to various stakeholders of the secondary education in Hong Kong. The clauses having these pronouns and proper nouns as either the Agent or Beneficiary were identified and examined in order to find out: (1) the level of commitment of the officials/administrative entities with reference to the process types used; (2) the level of commitment of these officials/administrative entities with reference to the modality level chosen; (3) the power status of the officials/administrative entities; and (4) the specific role, if any, played by the officials/administrative entities. Systemic functional grammar was the framework being drawn upon in undertaking the analysis.
(1999) The linguistic pragmatics of political pronouns in Venezuelan Spanish. In J. Verschueren (ed.), Selected Papers (Vol. 1) From the 6th International Pragmatics Conference.Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association, pp. 56-69.
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer
(2006) Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews. Text & Talk 26.1: 3-37. BoP
van Dijk, Teun
(2006) Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society 17.2: 359-383.
(2005) Report on Review of Medium of Instruction for Secondary Schools and Secondary School Places Allocation. Hong Kong: Printing Department.
Education Bureau, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government
(2009) Education Bureau Circular No. 6/(2009) Fine-tuning the medium of instruction for secondary schools.
Education Commission, Hong Kong Government
(1990) Report No. 4: The Curriculum and Behavioral Problems in Schools. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
(1997) Medium of Instruction: Guidance for Secondary Schools. Hong Kong: Printing Department.
(1994) The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 211: 67-100. BoP
(2001) English generic we, you and they: An analysis in terms of territory of information. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 1111-1124. BoP
Marsch, R, and J. Sampson
(1963) Report of Education Commission. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
(1994) The politics of pronouns. ELTJ 48.2: 173–178.
Proctor, Katarzyna, and Lily Su
(2011) The 1st person plural in political discourse - American politicians in interviews and in a debate. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3251-3266. BoP
(2002) Who is ‘us’ in Russian political discourse. In A. Duszak (ed.), Us and others: Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 233-238.
(2008) Discursive strategies in Chavez's political discourse: Voicing, distancing, and shifting. Critical Discourse Studies 5.2: 133-152.
Zahrah, Fatima, Jason R. C. Nurse & Michael Goldsmith
2020. 2020 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW), ► pp. 438 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.