The strategic value of pronominal choice
Exclusive and inclusive “we” in political panel debates
This study explores the use of the first person plural pronoun “we/wij” by government and opposition party members in panel debates from the Flemish talk show De Zevende Dag. Both groups of politicians enter this arena with divergent communicative goals, which has clear implications (i) for the type of propositions in which subclasses of “we/wij”-pronouns are generally involved and (ii) for the politicians’ assessment of the status of these propositions. Patterns with regard to these three implications are analyzed by means of a systemic functional approach supported with quantitative data. It is claimed that government and opposition party discussants either employ distinct patterns in accordance with their different aims, or that they use similar ones, albeit with divergent discourse functions. The former scenario turns out to be true in the case of exclusive uses of “we/wij” and the latter in the case of inclusive meanings. In that way, the paper sheds light on subtle differences in how government and opposition party discussants argue and deal with the invisible presence of an overhearing broadcast audience.
Keywords: Political panel debates, Pronominal reference, Pragmatics, Appraisal, Systemic functional linguistics (SFL), Activity type
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 June 2013
Bednarek, Monika A
(2009) Dimensions of evaluation: Cognitive and linguistic perspectives. Pragmatics and Cognition 17.1: 146-175. BoP
Blom, J.-P., and J.J. Gumperz
Bull, P., and A. Fetzer
(2006) Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews. Text & Talk 26.1: 3-37. BoP
Chilton, Paul A
(2004) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge. MetBib.
Chilton, P.A., and C. Schäffner
Clayman, Steven E
Clayman, S.E., and J. Heritage
(2002) The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
(2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York: Routledge. BoP.
(1981) Footing. In E. Goffman (ed.), Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 124-159. BoP
Greatbatch, David L
Halliday, M.A.K., and C.M.I.M. Matthiessen
Hunston, S., and G. Thompson
(2000) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP
(2000 ) Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Lauerbach, Gerda E
(2006) Discourse representation in political interviews: The construction of identities and relations through voicing and ventriloquizing. Journal of Pragmatics 38.2: 196-215. BoP
Lauerbach, G.E., and A. Fetzer
(2007) Political discourse in the media: Cross-cultural perspectives. In G.E. Lauerbach, and A. Fetzer (eds.), Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 3-28. BoP
Levinson, Stephen C
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP.
Martin, J.R., and D. Rose
Martin, J.R., and P.R.R. White
McGregor, William B
(1997) Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press. BoP
(2010) Attitude and subjectivity in Italian and British hard-news reporting: The construction of a culture-specific 'reporter' voice. Discourse Studies 12.1: 106-137. BoP
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik
(2000 ) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman. BoP
(1997) Modal (un)certainty in political discourse: A functional account. Language Sciences 19.4: 341-356. BoP
(2000) The functions of I think in political discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10.1: 41-63. BoP
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., P.R.R. White, and K. Aijmer
(2007) Presupposition and 'taking-for-granted' in mass communicated political argument: An illustration from British, Flemish and Swedish political colloquy. In A. Fetzer, and G.E. Lauerbach (eds.), Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 31-74.
(1990) Collins COBUILD English Grammar. London: Harper Collins. BoP
Sperber, D., and D. Wilson
(1995 ) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. BoP
(1999) Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold. BoP
White, Peter R.R
Cited by 6 other publications
Jacobs, Catho, Dorien Van De Mieroop & Colette Van Laar
Li, Tao & Kaibao Hu
Li, Tao & Yifan Zhu
Maalej, Zouheir A.
Vázquez Laslop, María Eugenia
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.