Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 23:4 (2013) ► pp.605–632

Emotionalization in new television formats of science popularization

The fierce struggle for television audiences is greatest when the content shown is not strictly entertainment, such as, for example, when specialized knowledge is brought to a wide audience. However, the appearance of new television formats has enabled scientific and technical contents to be brought closer to an unprepared and very diverse audience. What resources do these programs use to achieve this? Is emotionalization, which is increasingly dominant in the media, an important strategy in programs that seek to spread scientific knowledge among the general public? Do they use the pluri-locutionary nature of their discourse to promote understanding of the contents and to capture the viewers’ attention? Our research, which forms part of a broader study of new television formats and the communication of knowledge, is the first study on the discourse of the mediatization of knowledge in Spain. The topic is of particular interest because it coincides with the production of innovative television formats that endeavor to capture the interest of sections of the population that usually do not access this type of content. They have an important social function since, as Semir (2011: 19) points out, the knowledge of the world they promote reduces the fear generated in human beings by that which is opaque or unknown, thereby increasing the ability to make decisions and increasing efficiency. Through the linguistic analysis of the statements uttered by the diverse voices of a popular communication program, Quèquicom (Whatwhohow), we will determine which emotions are more present in the program and, therefore, contribute towards its communicative success, and which speakers (presenters, experts or affected individuals) use them more. Determining the resources leading to the success of this program can provide effective tools for other programs with very diverse aims. Studies of this type in Spain have focused on the press but very little on television. This study forms part of a wider research project on new television formats and the communication of knowledge to different audiences and diverse levels of specialization. It has been proven that emotions join together to provide a dramatic progression, based on the tension-relaxation binomial, a progression that holds the audience’s interest, in a similar manner to dramatic fiction programs. Moreover, the emotions can be examined in three ways: they can be referred to as a fact in the reality being narrated, expressed by the speakers or triggered in the audience. Lastly, it was also observed that the emotional charge that justifies the presence of affected individuals or witnesses in the majority of television programs spreads to the voices of the presenters themselves. The transmission of emotions is almost as important as that of knowledge.

Keywords: Media discourse, Emotions, Popularization, Television
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 December 2013
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23.4.02bas
References
Aristotle
(1995) Poétique. Paris: Les Belles Arts.Google Scholar
Barlett, Ch.P., and D.A. Gentile
(2011) Affective and emotional consequences of the mass media. In K. Döveling, Ch. von Scheve, Christian and E.A. Konijn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 60-78.Google Scholar
Bassols, Margarida
(coord.) (2012) La divulgació en els nous formats televisius. Bellaterra: Publicacions de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Berger, Seymour M
(1962) Conditioning through vicarious instigation. Psychological Review 691: 450-466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd-Barrett, O., and P. Braham
(eds.) (1987) Media, Knowledge and Power. London: Croom.Google Scholar
Bryant, J., and D. Zillmann
(1994) Media Effects. Advances in Theory and Research. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Calsamiglia, H., and C. López Ferrero
(2003) Role and position of scientific voices: Reported speech in the media. Discourse Studies 5.2: 147–73. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Calsamiglia, H., and T. Van Dijk
(2004) Popularization discourse and knowledge about the genome. Discourse and Society 15.4: 369–89. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Carmona, Ramón
(1996) Cómo se comenta un texto fílmico. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Casetti, F., and F. de Chio
(1991) Cómo analizar un film. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick
(2008) La médiatisation de la science. Clonage, OGM, manipulations genètiques. Bruxelles: De Boeck.Google Scholar
Chaume, Frederic
(2004) Cine i traducción. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Condry, John
(1989) The Psychology of Television. Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L., and J. Tooby
(2000) Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. In M. Lewis, and J.M. Haviland-Jones (eds.), Handbook of Emotions. New York, NY: Guilford, pp. 91-115.Google Scholar
Cros, A., M. Bassols, G. Brunat, and C. Gónzalez
(2012) Television and the mediatization of knowledge: Discursive strategies in new TV formats. Catalan Journal of Communication and Cultural Studies, Volume 4 Number 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Semir, Vladimir
(2011) Metaanálisis: comunicación científica y periodismo científico. La crisis de los medios de comunicación. Madrid: Fundación Española de la Ciencia y la Tecnología.Google Scholar
Detenber, B.H., and A. Lang
(2011) The influence of form and presentation attributes. In K. Döveling, Ch. von Scheve, and E.A. Konijn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 275-293.Google Scholar
Döveling, K., Ch. von Scheve, and E.A. Konijn
(eds.) (2011) The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ewoldsen, D.R., J.H. Yu, and N. Rhodes
(2004) Fear appeal messages effect accessibility of attitudes toward the threat and adaptive behaviors. Communication Monographs 711: 49-69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, Barbara L
(1998) What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology 2.3: 300-19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friestad, M., and E. Thorson
(1986) Emotion - eliciting advertising - effects on long-term-memory and judgment. Advances in Consumer Research 131: 111-16.Google Scholar
Frijda, Nico H
(1988) The laws of emotion. In J. Jenkins, K. Oatley, and N. Stein (eds.), (1998) Human Emotions: A Reader.Malden: M.A. Blackwell Publishers, pp. 271-287.Google Scholar
Galati, D., B. Sini, S. Estaún Ferrer, O. Soler Vilageliu, and P.M. Mateos García
(1998) The emotion lexicon in Neo-latin languages. In A.H. Fisher (ed.), ISRE’98 Proceedings of the Xth Conference of the International Society for Research on Emotion. Wursburg I.S.R.E. Edition, pp. 214-218.Google Scholar
Gerbner, George
(1998) Cultivation analysis: An overview. Mass Communication and Society 3/41: 175-194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerbner, G., L. Gross, M. Morgan, and N. Signorielli
(1986) Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In J. Bryant, and D. Zillman (eds.), Perspectives on media effects. Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 17-48.Google Scholar
(1994) Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant, and D. Zillmann (eds.), Media Effects. Advances in Theory and Research.Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 17-41.Google Scholar
Hamilton, V., G.H. Bower, and N.H. Frijda
(eds.) Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation Dordrecht Kluwer DOI logo
Kleinginna, P.R., and A.M. Kleinginna
(1981) A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion 5.4: 345-379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konijn, E.A., and J.M. ten Holt
(2011) «From noise to nucleus». Emotion as key construct in processing media messages. In K. Döveling, Ch. Von Scheve, and E.A. Konijn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 37-59.Google Scholar
Lang, A., P. Bolls, R.F. Potter, and K. Kawahara
(1999) The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television messages. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media/Fall, pp. 451-475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lang, A., and D.R. Ewoldsen
(2011) The measurement of positive and negative affect in media research. In K. Döveling, Ch. von Scheve, and E.A. Konijn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 79-98.Google Scholar
Lazarus, Richard S
(1993) from psychological stress to the emotions: A History of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology 441: 1-21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1966) Psychological Stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lewis, M., and J.M. Haviland-Jones
(eds.) Handbook of Emotions 2nd edn New York City, NY Guilford
Miceli, M., and C. Castelfranchi
(2003) Crying: Discussing its basic reasons and uses. New Ideas in Psychology 211: 247-73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moirand, Sophie
(2007) Les discours de la presse quotidienne. Observer, analyser, comprendre. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Myers, Greg
(2003) Discourse studies of scientific popularization: Questioning the boundaries. Discourse Studies 5.2: 265–79. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Nabi, R.L., D.R. Ewoldsen. and F.D. Carpentier
(2008) Subjective knowledge and fear appeal effectiveness: Implications for image design. Health Communication 231: 191-201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliver, M.B., and J.K. Wooley
(2011) Tragic and poignant entertainment. The gratifications of meaningfulness as emotional response. In K. Döveling, Ch. von Scheve, and E.A. Konijn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 134-147.Google Scholar
Ortony, A., G.L. Clore, and A. Collins
(1988) The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Raney, Arthur A
(2011) Media enjoyment as a function of affective dispositions toward and moral judgment of characters. In K. Döveling, Ch. von Scheve, and E.A. Konijn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 166-178.Google Scholar
(2006) The psychology of disposition-based theories of media enjoyment. In J. Bryant, and P. Vorderer (eds.), Psychology of entertainment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 137-150.Google Scholar
Russell, James A
(1980) A circumflex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 391: 1161-78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santamaria, L., and G. Brunat
(2012) Discurs televisiu i multimodalitat. In M. Bassols (ed.), La divulgació en els nous formats televisius. Bellaterrra: Publications de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, pp. 133-152.Google Scholar
Santamaria, L., M. Bassols, and A.M. Torrent
(2011) Television programs for teenagers and the use of multimodality in knowledge popularisation. Journalism and Mass Communication 1.2: 79-87.Google Scholar
Scherer, Klaus R
(1998) Emotionsprozesse im Medienkontext: Forschungsillustrationen und Zukunftsperspectiven. Medienpsychologie 10.4: 276-293.Google Scholar
(1988) Criteria for emotion-antecedent appraisal: A review. In V. Hamilton, G.H. Bower, and N.H. Frijda (eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 89-126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, B., and U. Lewandrowski
(1993) Trägt das Fernsehen zur Regulierung von Stimmungen bei? Intraindividuelle Analysen zur “Mood Management”. Hypothese auf der Grundlage eines dinamisch-transaktionalen Modells. Medienpsychologie 5.1: 64-84.Google Scholar
Schwab, F., and C. Schwender
(2011) The descent of emotions in media. Darwinian perspectives. In K. Döveling, Ch. von Scheve, and E.A. Konijn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 15-36.Google Scholar
Searle, John
(1969) Speach Acts: An Essay on the philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stotland, Ezra
(1969) Exploratory investigations of empathy. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 41: 271-313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Monique M
(2011) Emotion in persuasion and risk communication. In K. Döveling, Ch. von Scheve, and E.A. Konijn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 237-258.Google Scholar
Unz, Dagmar C
(2011) Effects of presentation and editing on emotional responses on viewers. In K. Döveling, C. von Scheve, and E.A. Konijn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 294-309.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
(1991) Conjunctive structure in documentary film and television. Continuum 5.1: 76-114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vorderer, P., and S. Knobloch
(2000) Conflict and suspense in drama. In D. Zillmann, and P. Vorderer (eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal.Mahwah, NJ /London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 56-68.Google Scholar
Wirth, W., and H. Schramm
(2005) Media and Emotions. Communication Research Trends. Centre for the Study of Communication and Culture. 24.3: 1-39. [URL] [URL]
Zillmann, Dolf
(1996) The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In P. Vorderer, W.J. Wulff, and M. Friedrichsen (eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 199-231.Google Scholar
(1998) Does tragic drama have redeeming value? Siegener Periodikum für Internationale Literaturwissenschaft 161: 1-11.Google Scholar
(1991) Empathy: Affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. In J. Bryant, and D. Zillmann (eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 135-168.Google Scholar
Zillmann, D., and J. Bryant
(1975) Viewer’s moral sanction of retribution in the appreciation of dramatic presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 111: 572-82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zillmann, D., and J.R. Cantor
(1972) Directionality of transitory dominance as a communication variable affecting humor appreciation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 241: 191-198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1977) Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 131: 155-165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Cardamone, Ernesto, Gaetano Miceli & Maria Antonietta Raimondo
2024. Better abstract or concrete, narrating or not: optimal strategies for the communication of innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 27:9 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Cros Alavedra, Anna
1970. La divulgación en la televisión: ¿socialización del conocimiento o educación científica?. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 69 ► pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Hujala, Teppo, Samuli Junttila & Nina Tokola
2021. Youth Inclusion in Forest Policy Dialogue: Contemplating Human–Forest Relationships through Arts-Based Methods. Rural Landscapes: Society, Environment, History 8:1 DOI logo
Piontek, Dorota & Artur Kopka
2019. Politikberatung und Lobbyismus in der Mediendemokratie. In Politikberatung und Lobbyismus im parlamentarischen Entscheidungsprozess, ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.