Framing and manipulation of person deixis in Hosni Mubarak’s last three speeches
A cognitive-pragmatic approach
The “Arab Spring,” as the revolutions in some Arab countries were called by the international media, was triggered by the “Jasmine Revolt” in Tunisia, which provoked a domino effect to some Arab leaders, starting from Tunisia and spreading to Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Syria, etc. Using the insights of cognitive-pragmatics, the current article shows how the last three speeches of Husni Mubarak, the demised president of Egypt (DPE), framed the revolution in Egypt and filled person deixis. In particular, the article argues that, from the antepenultimate to the ultimate speech, the DPE, unlike his Tunisian counterpart, made little change to the initial framing of the revolution in Egypt as a strategy to maintain the sociopolitical situation as it was. As transpires from the lexical items environing person deixis, the DPE filled it with cognitive content which prevented him from coming any closer to a pragmatic rapprochement to the Egyptian people.
References (31)
Abu-Abbas, Khaled H., Samir O. Jarbou, Thaer T. Al-Kadi, Muhammad A. Badarneh, and Fathi H. Migdadi
(
2010)
Fictive kinship names in Jordanian Arabic.
Ononomasiology Online 111: 1-10.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adetunji, Akinbiyi
(
2006)
Inclusion and exclusion in political discourse: Deixis in Olusegun Obasanjo's speeches.
Journal of Language and Linguistics 5.2: 177-191.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bassiouney, Reem
(
2012)
Politicizing identity: Code choice and stance-taking during the Egyptian revolution.
Discourse & Society 23.2: 107-126.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bateson, Gregory
(
2006)
A theory of play and fantasy. In
K. Salen, and
E. Zimmerman (eds.),
The game design reader: The rules of play anthology.Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, pp. 314-328.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benvéniste, Emile
(
1966)
La nature des pronoms (
The nature of pronouns). Paris: Collection Gallimard, pp. 251-257.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles. J
(
1975)
An alternative to checklist theories of meaning.
Berkeley Linguistic Society 11: 123-131.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Galasinski, Darius
(
2000)
The language of deception: A discourse analytical study. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage Publications, Inc.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving
(
1974)
Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hanks, William F
(
1992)
The indexical ground of deictic reference. In
A. Duranti, and
C. Goodwin (eds.),
Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43-76.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hanks, William F
(
2005)
Explorations in the deictic field.
Current Anthropology 46.2: 191-212.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harwood, Nigel
(
2005)
‘We do not seem to have a theory... the theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing.
Applied Linguistics 26.3: 343-375.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken
(
2002)
Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing.
Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1091–1112.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuo, Sai-Hua
(
2002)
From solidarity to antagonism: The uses of the second-person singular pronoun in Chinese political discourse.
Text 22.1: 29–55.
BoP ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuo, Sai-Hua
(
2003)
Involvement vs. detachment: Gender differences in the use of personal pronouns in televised sports in Taiwan.
Discourse Studies 5.4: 479-494.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George
(
2004)
Don’t think of an elephant: Know your values and frame the debate. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
(
1999)
Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, Stephen. C
(
1983)
Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, Stephen. C
(
2006)
Cognition at the heart of human interaction.
Discourse Studies 8.1: 85-93.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maalej, Zouheir
(
2007)
Doing critical discourse analysis with the contemporary theory of metaphor: Towards a discourse model of metaphor. In
C. Hart, and
D. Lukeš (eds.),
Cognitive linguistics in critical discourse studies: Application and theory.Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press, pp. 132-158.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maalej, Zouheir
(
2010)
Addressing non-acquaintances in Tunisian Arabic: A cognitive-pragmatic account.
Intercultural Pragmatics 7.1: 147-173.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maalej, Zouheir
(
2012)
The “Jasmine Revolt” has made the Tunisian revolution: A critical discourse analysis of the last three political speeches of the ousted Tunisian president.
Discourse & Society 23.6: 679-700.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O'Connor, Brendan, Maisa Taha, and Megan Sheehan
(
2008)
Castro's shifters: Locating variation in political discourse.
University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14.2: 121-129.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pennycook, Alistair
(
1994)
The politics of pronouns.
ELT Journal 48.2: 13-18.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, Teun A
(
2006)
Discourse and manipulation.
Discourse & Society 17.3: 359-383.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verschueren, Jef
(
1999)
Understanding pragmatics. London and New York: Arnold.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, John
(
1990)
Politically speaking: The pragmatic analysis of political language. Oxford: Blackwell.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Oparinde, Kunle, Maleshoane Rapeane-Mathonsi, Gift Mheta & Margrét GunnarsdÓttir Champion
2021.
Exploring manipulative rhetorical choices in Nigerian political speeches.
Cogent Arts & Humanities 8:1
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Seara, Isabel Roboredo & Leonor Werneck Dos Santos
2020.
Linguagem e poder nas mídias brasileira e portuguesa.
Diacrítica 33:3
► pp. 122 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.