Article In:
Pragmatics: Online-First Articles

Crazy literature

A case of mock self-impoliteness

| Dalian University of Foreign Languages
| Dalian University of Foreign Languages | California State University, San BernardinoSan Bernardino
| Dalian University of Foreign Languages
In this paper, we investigate crazy literature, a newly emerged genre on Chinese Internet in which posters portray themselves as being mentally instable or, simply, insane. Based on data collected from the Internet and findings from a survey of college students, we argue that the image created by crazy literature is best captured by the notion of mock self-impoliteness. That is, although the image of insanity is damaging to the self-face of the poster, the impolite self-image is a persona, not the real image, motivated by transactional effectiveness. In addition, crazy literature helps the blogger to appear humorous, to express their helplessness in vulnerable situations, and to gain a sense of belonging. Our paper, therefore, contributes to the pragmatics literature by drawing scholars’ attention to a (possibly) hitherto non-existent type of language use, offering an analysis of the genre that is innovative, and demonstrating a need for investigating Internet pragmatics seriously.
Keywords: crazy literature, mock self-impoliteness, motivation, transactional effectiveness
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Preliminaries
    • 2.1Research on crazy literature
    • 2.2Theoretical prerequisites
  • 3.Methodology and findings
    • 3.1Data collection
    • 3.2Survey
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Linguistic features of crazy literature
      • Interrogation
      • Emotive lexicon
      • Hyperbole
      • Illogicality
      • Parody
      • Metaphors
      • Special symbols
      • Misordering of elements
    • 4.2Self-image in crazy literature
    • 4.3Motivations for crazy literature
    • 4.4Crazy literature, other Internet genres, and the Internet modality
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (30)
References
Attardo, Salvatore. 1994. Linguistic Theories of Humor. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Humor and Laughter.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Heidi E. Hamilton, Deborah Tannen, and Deborah Schiffrin, 168–188. Chichester: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Steven Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Rong. 1993. “Responding to Compliments: A Contrastive Study of Politeness Strategies Between American and Chinese Speakers.” Journal of Pragmatics. 20 (1): 49–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Self-Politeness: A Proposal.” Journal of Pragmatics. 33 (1): 87–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Toward a Motivation Model of Pragmatics. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. “Why Impolite: Politeness, Impoliteness, Other-Politeness, Self-Politeness.” East Asian Pragmatics 8 (1):1–26.Google Scholar
. 2024. Chinese Politeness: Diachrony, Variation, and Universals in Politeness Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Rong, and Dafu Yang. 2023. “Conventions of Author Self-Reference in Chinese Academic Writing. Modesty as Motivation.” Pragmatics and Society 15 (3): 425–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, Yaping, and Wei Ren. 2020. “Managing Image: The Self-Praise of Celebrities on Social Media.” Discourse, Context & Media 381: 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2009. “Designing a Multimodal Spoken Component of the Australian National Corpus.” In Selected Proceedings of the 2008 HSCNet Workshop on Designing the Australian National Corpus: Mustering Languages, ed. by Michael Haugh, Kate Burridge, Jean Mulder, and Pam Peters, 74–86. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)Affiliation and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2106–2119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Humour, Face and Im/Politeness in Getting Acquainted.” In Situated Politeness, ed. by Bethan Davies, Michael Haugh, and John Merrison, 165–184. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Derek Bousfield. 2012. “Mock Impoliteness, Jocular Mockery and Jocular Abuse in Australian and British English.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (9): 1099–1114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 2002. “Male Cheerleaders and Wanton Women: Humour Among New Zealand Friends.” Te Reo (Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand) 451: 3–36.Google Scholar
He, Lin, Rong Chen and Ming Dong. 2023. “Humorous Mockery: How to Amuse and Be Polite at the Same Time.” Journal of Pragmatics 2111: 31–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 2000. “Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace.” Discourse Studies 21: 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jia, Xiang. 2023. “‘Be Crazy’ and ‘Pretend to Be Crazy’ — The Performance of Network Buzzwords from Crazy-Literature Point of View.” Creation Criticism (1): 42–46.Google Scholar
Kang, Chunhua. 2023. “Language Experiment, Meme Carnival and Youth’s Subjectivity Reshaping: A Study on the Phenomenon of “×× Literature” in Network Buzzwords.” Creation Criticism (1): 38–42.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lin, Yanling, and Xinren Chen. 2022. “Also on Humblebragging: Why Many Chinese Posters Brag by Complaining.” Journal of Pragmatics 2011: 149–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maslow, Abraham H. 1943. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review 501: 370–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Fan, and Wang Li. 2023. “The “Kuakua” Fever: Proactively Requesting Praise on Chinese Social Networking Sites.” Journal of Pragmatics 2051: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2019. “An Outline of Some Future Research Issues for Internet Pragmatics.” Internet Pragmatics 2 (1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Zhehan, and Jinhong Zhao. 2023. “A Study on the Dissemination of “Crazy Literature” in Youth Groups from the Perspective of Interaction Ritual Chain.” New Media Research (3): 52–55.Google Scholar
Zhou, Ling, and Daniel Kádár. 2021. “Self-Denigration in 21st Century Chinese.” Journal of Politeness Research-Language Behavior Culture 17 (2): 265–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Ling, and Shaojie Zhang. 2018. “Reconstructing the Politeness Principle in Chinese: A Response to Gu’s Approach.” Intercultural Pragmatics 15 (5): 693–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar