Article published In:
The interaction between context and grammar in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Nuria Alturo, Evelien Keizer and Lluís Payrató
[Pragmatics 24:2] 2014
► pp. 249273
References
Arnold, Jennifer E
(2008) Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 231: 495-527. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Dik
(1999) FG expression rules: From templates to constituent structure. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 67. University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
(2001) The FG expression rules: A dynamic model. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 421: 15-54.Google Scholar
(2005) Agreement: More arguments for the dynamic expression model. In Casper de Groot, and Kees Hengeveld (eds.), Morphosyntactic expression in Functional Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1-40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bargh, John
(2006) What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology 361: 147-168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. Kathryn
(1996) Language production: Methods and methodologies. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 31: 395-421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering, and Alexandra A. Cleland
(2000) Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition 751: B13-B25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
(1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy
(2008) Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H
(1996) Using Language. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Deanna Wilkes-Gibb
(1986) Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 221: 1-39. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Connolly, John H
(2007) Context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa 51/21: 11-33.Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne, and Diana Slade
(2005) Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Victor S., and J. Kathryn Bock
(2006) The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 211: 1011-1029. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson
(2002) Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14-38.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles
(2011) Lexical cohesion in multiparty conversations. Language Sciences 331: 167-179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
(1975) Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole, and Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol 3. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
(1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hasson, Uri, Asif A. Ghazanfar, Bruno Galantucci, Simon Garrod, and Christian Keysers
(2012) Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16/21: 114-121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
(2005) Dynamic expression in Functional Discourse Grammar. In Casper de Groot, and Kees Hengeveld (eds.), Morphosyntactic expression in Functional Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 53-86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees, and J. Lachlan Mackenzie
(2008) Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
this volume) Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics 24.2: 203-227. DOI logo
Iacoboni, Marco
(2005) Understanding others: Imitation, language, and empathy. In Susan Hurley, and Nick Chater (eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science. Vol. 1: Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 77-99.Google Scholar
(2008) Mirroring People: The New Science of how we Connect with Others. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Isaac, Ellen A., and Herbert H. Clark
(1987) References in conversations between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1161: 26-37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempson, Ruth, and Ronnie Cann
(2007) Dynamic Syntax: Preliminaries for a dialogue-driven account of syntactic change. In Joseph C. Salmons, and Shannon Dubenion-Smith (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2005. Amsterdam and Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 73-101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, Willem J.M
(1989) Speaking. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1999) A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown, and P. Hagoort (eds.), The neurocognition of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 83-122.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
(2000) Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per
(2007) Dialogicality in languages, minds and brains: Is there a convergence between dialogism and neuro-biology? Language Sciences 291: 605-620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
(2012) Cognitive adequacy in a dialogic Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 341: 421-432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin J., and Victor S. Ferreira
(2008) Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin 134/11: 427-459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin J., and Steven Garrod
(2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 271: 169-226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poesio, Massimo, and Hannes Rieser
(2010) Completions, coordination, and alignment in dialogue. Dialogue and Discourse 1. [URL], accessed 26 October 2011 . DOI logo
Schober, Michael F., and Susan E. Brennan
(2003) Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner. In Arthur C. Graesser, Morton A. Gernsbacher, and Susan R. Goldman (eds.), Handbook of discourse processes. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 123-164.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
(2006) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. (2nd edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda
(2010) Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam and Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Connolly, John H.
2015. The Contextual Component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
García Velasco, Daniel
2015. Activation and the relation between context and grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
García Velasco, Daniel
2015. Activation and the relation between context and grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
GARCÍA VELASCO, Daniel
2017. Modularity and derivation in Functional Discourse Grammar. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 33:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Velasco, Daniel García
2022. Modification and context. Open Linguistics 8:1  pp. 524 ff. DOI logo
Giomi, Riccardo
2015. Grammar, context and the hearer. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2015. Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2016. Dynamicity and dialogue. English Text Construction 9:1  pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Taverniers, Miriam
2021. Modelling interfaces with context in SFL. Functions of Language 28:3  pp. 291 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.