Article published In:
The interaction between context and grammar in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Nuria Alturo, Evelien Keizer and Lluís Payrató
[Pragmatics 24:2] 2014
► pp. 317348
Alexiadou, A
(2001) Functional structure in nominals. Nominalization and ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Connolly, J.H
(2007) Context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa 51/21: 11-33.Google Scholar
Dik, S.C
(1980) Studies in Functional Grammar. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1985) Nederlandse nominalisaties in een funktionele grammatika. Forum der Letteren 261: 82-107.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W
(1994) Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J.W
(1985) Competing motivations. In J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 343-365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987) The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 631: 805-855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J., N. Hedberg, and R. Zacharski
(1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69.2: 175-204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeseryn, W., K. Romijn, G. Geerts, J. de Rooij, and M.C. van den Toorn
(1997) Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst. 2nd ed. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Harbert, W
(2007) The Germanic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K
(2008) Prototypical and non-prototypical noun phrases in Functional Discourse Grammar. In D. García Velasco, and J. Rijkhoff (eds.), The noun phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 43-62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, K., and J.L. Mackenzie
(2008) Functional Discourse Grammar. A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Functional Discourse Grammar. In B. Heine, and H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 367-400.Google Scholar
Heyvaert, L
(2008) On the constructional semantics of gerundive nominalizations. Folia Linguistica 42.1: 39-82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J., and S.A. Thompson
(1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56.2: 251-299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keizer, E
(2004) Term structure in FG: A modest proposal. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 78.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M
(1993) Nominalizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2003) Action nominal constructions in the languages of Europe. In F. Plank (ed.), Noun phrase structure in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 723-759.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K
(1994) Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lyons, C
(1999) Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, J.L
(1985) Nominalization and valency reduction. In A.M. Bolkestein, C. de Groot, and J.L. Mackenzie (eds.), Predicates and terms in functional grammar. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 29-47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) English nominalizations in the layered model of the sentence. In B. Devriendt, L. Goossens, and J. van der Auwera (eds.), Complex structures. A functionalist perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 325-355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, M
(1985) ‘Complementation’. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume II. Complex constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prince, E
(1981) Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 223-255.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ross, J.R
(1973) Nouniness. In O. Fujimura (ed.), Three dimensions of linguistics theory. Tokyo: TEC 137-257.Google Scholar
Siewierska, A
(2004) Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M
(1986) Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In P. Muysken, and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Features and projections. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 163-232. Originally published in R.M.W. Dixon (ed.), 1976. Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages. Canberra: Australian Institutes of Aboriginal Studies, pp. 112-171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Belle, W., and W. Van Langendonck
(1996) The indirect object in Dutch. In W. Van Belle, and W. Van Langendonck (eds.), The Dative. Volume 1: Descriptive studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 217-250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, J.-C
(2008) The status of purpose, reason, and intended endpoint in the typology of complex sentences: Implications for layered models of clause structure. Linguistics 46.4: 757-788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Animacy and information structure in the system of ergative marking in Umpithamu. Lingua 1201: 1637-1651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Giomi, Riccardo
2015. Grammar, context and the hearer. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.