Article published In:
Approaches to grammar for interactional linguisticsEdited by Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Pragmatics 24:3] 2014
► pp. 533–560
Edited by Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Pragmatics 24:3] 2014
► pp. 533–560
Syntactic structures and their symbiotic guests
Notes on analepsis from the perspective of online syntax
The empirical focus of this paper is on utterances that re-use syntactic structures from a preceding syntactic unit. Next utterances of this type are usually treated as (coordination) ellipsis. It is argued that from an on-line perspective on spoken syntax, they are better described as structural latency: A grammatical structure already established remains available and can therefore be made use of with one or more of its slots being filled by new material. A variety of cases of this particular kind of conversational symbiosis are discussed. It is argued that they should receive a common treatment. A number of features of the general host/guest relationship are discussed.
Keywords: Structural latency, On-line syntax, Analepsis
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Auer, Peter
(2009) On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 311: 1-13. 
Auer, Peter, and Stefan Pfänder
(2007) Multiple retractions in spoken French and spoken German. A contrastive study in oral performance styles. Cahiers de Praxématique 481 : 57-84.
Auer, Peter, and Yael Maschler
(2013) Discourse or grammar? VS patterns in spoken Hebrew and spoken German narratives. Language Sciences 37 : 147-181.
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire
(1990) Le français parlé - études grammaticales. Paris: Editions du CNRS.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
(2001) Introducing Interactional Linguistics. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, and M. Selting (eds.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.1-22. BoP
BoPDu Bois, John
(2001) Towards a dialogical syntax. University of Santa Barbara, California [manuscript].
Fox, Barbara A., and Sandra A. Thompson
(2010) Responses to WH-questions in English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43.2: 133-156. BoP
BoPHennig, Mathilde
(ed.) (2013) Die Ellipse. Neue Perspektiven auf ein altes Phänomen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hoffmann, Ludger
(1999) Ellipse und Analepse. In A. Redder, and J. Rehbein (eds.), Grammatik und mentale Prozesse. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, pp. 69-90.
Imo, Wolfgang
(2013) Ellipsen und Verstehen in der Interaktion. In M. Hennig (ed.), Die Ellipse. Neue Perspektiven auf ein altes Phänomen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 281-319.
Kindt, Walther
(1985) Grammatische Prinzipien sogenannter Ellipsen und ein neues Syntaxmodell. In R. Meyer-Hermann, and H. Rieser (eds.), Ellipsen und fragmentarische Ausdrücke. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 161-290.
(2013) Theoretische und methodische Grundlagen der Ellipsenmodellierung. Ergebnisse einer systematischen Betrachtung. In M. Hennig (ed.), Die Ellipse. Neue Perspektiven auf ein altes Phänomen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 39-106.
Klein, Wolfgang
(1993) Ellipse. In J. Jacobs, T. Vennemann, W. Sternefeld, and A. Stechow (eds.), Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. Vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 763-799.
Knobloch, Clemens
(2013) ‘Ein Teil, das fehlt, geht nie kaputt’ - Ellipsen in Grammatik und Kommunikation. In M. Hennig (ed.), Die Ellipse. Neue Perspektiven auf ein altes Phänomen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 19-38.
Lambrecht, Knud
Lerner, Gene
Lötscher, Andreas
(2013) Einsetzen - finden - erfinden - vermuten - erahnen? Ellipsenverstehen aus der Perspektive von Textverstehen und Textbedeutung. In M. Henning (ed.), Die Ellipse. Neue Perspektiven auf ein altes Phänomen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 183-226.
Merchant, Jason
(2001) The Syntax of Silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2004) Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27.6: 661-738.
Pfeiffer, Martin
(2014) Die syntaktische Struktur von Selbstreparaturen im Deutschen. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Freiburg.
Rath, Rainer
(1979) Kommunikationspraxis: Analysen zur Textbildung und Textgliederung im gesprochenen Deutsch. Göppingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht. BoP
Rickheit, Gert, and Lorenz Sichelschmidt
(2013) Verstehen von Ellipsen - ein holistischer Ansatz. In M. Hennig (ed.), Die Ellipse. Neue Perspektiven auf ein altes Phänomen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 159-182.
Rost-Roth, Martina
(2003) Fragen - Nachfragen - Echofragen. Formen und Funktionen von Interrogationen im gesprochenen Deutsch. Linguistik online 13, 1/03 ([URL]).
Sacks, Harvey
Schegloff, Emanuel
(1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52-133. BoP
BoPSelting, Margret
(1997) Sogenannte Ellipsen als interaktiv relevante Konstruktionen? Ein neuer Versuch über die Reichweite und Grenzen des Ellipsenbegriffs für die Analyse gesprochener Sprache in Interaktionen. In Peter Schlobinski (eds.), Syntax des gesprochenen Deutsch. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 117-156.
(2004) Listen: Sequenzielle und prosodische Struktur einer kommunikativen Praktik – eine Untersuchung im Rahmen der Interaktionalen Linguistik. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 231: 1-46.
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg Bergmann, Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Arnulf Deppermann, Peter Gilles, Susanne Günthner, Martin Hartung, Friederike Kern, Christine Mertzlufft, Christian Meyer, Miriam Morek, Frank Oberzaucher, Jörg Peters, Uta Quasthoff, Wilfried Schütte, Anja Stukenbrock, and Susanne Uhmann
(2011) A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: Gat 2. Gespraechsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion. 121: 1-51.
Wegener, Philipp
(1885) Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen des Sprachlebens. Halle: Niemeyer.
Cited by
Cited by 18 other publications
Auer, Peter
2015. The temporality of language in interaction. In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27], ► pp. 27 ff. 
Auer, Peter & Jan Lindström
2021. On agency and affiliation in second assessments. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326], ► pp. 81 ff.
Dammel, Antje
2020. Absence as evidence. In Walking on the Grammaticalization Path of the Definite Article [Studies in Language Variation, 23], ► pp. 162 ff.
Deppermann, Arnulf & Alexandra Gubina
2021. When the Body Belies the Words: Embodied Agency With darf/kann ich? (“May/Can I?”) in German. Frontiers in Communication 6
Duvallon, Outi & Il-Il Yatziv-Malibert
2023. Prolongements de la notion de paradigme : outil descriptif et théorique au-delà du français parlé. Travaux de linguistique n° 84-85:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Fabre, Alain
2019. Multifunctionality of the verbal suffix -ʧɁe ~ -kɁe and analepsis in Nivaĉle (Mataguayo family, Gran Chaco region). LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 18:2 ► pp. 338 ff.
Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, Gregory James Mills, Christine Howes, Arash Eshghi, Stergios Chatzikyriakidis, Matthew Purver, Ruth Kempson, Ronnie Cann & Patrick G. T. Healey
2020. Completability vs (In)completeness. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 52:2 ► pp. 260 ff.
Günthner, Susanne
2015. A temporally oriented perspective on connectors in interactions. In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27], ► pp. 237 ff.
Helmer, Henrike
2017. Analepsen mit Topik-Drop. Zur Notwendigkeit einer diskurssemantischen Perspektive. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 45:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Laury, Ritva & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo
2016. Disclaiming epistemic access with ‘know’ and ‘remember’ in Finnish. Journal of Pragmatics 106 ► pp. 80 ff.
Laury, Ritva, Tsuyoshi Ono & Ryoko Suzuki
2019. Questioning the clause as a crosslinguistic unit in grammar and interaction. Studies in Language 43:2 ► pp. 364 ff.
Laury, Ritva, Tsuyoshi Ono & Ryoko Suzuki
2021. Questioning the clause as a crosslinguistic unit in grammar and interaction. In Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Units [Benjamins Current Topics, 114], ► pp. 123 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2018. The on-line emergence of Hebrew insubordinateshe- (‘that/which/who’) clauses. Studies in Language 42:3 ► pp. 669 ff.
Ploog, Katja
2023. Syntaxe de l’oral et activité de construction en temps réel : retour sur les grilles. Travaux de linguistique n° 84-85:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Thompson, Sandra A.
2019. Understanding ‘clause’ as an emergent ‘unit’ in everyday conversation. Studies in Language 43:2 ► pp. 254 ff.
Thompson, Sandra A.
2021. Understanding ‘clause’ as an emergent ‘unit’ in everyday conversation. In Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Units [Benjamins Current Topics, 114], ► pp. 11 ff.
Zinken, Jörg & Uwe-A. Küttner
2022. Offering an Interpretation of Prior Talk in Everyday Interaction: A Semantic Map Approach. Discourse Processes 59:4 ► pp. 298 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.