Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 24:4 (2014) ► pp.715–734

The way coca “speaks”

Pragmatic features of Andean divination

In this paper I will describe and interpret some data from Southern Quechua and Southern Aymara spoken texts recorded during traditional divinatory sessions. This analysis is aimed to show that divination can be considered as an example of how ritual speech, often described as a phenomenon based on fixed sequences, is characterized by variable elements too, being the relationship between a particular “context of situation” and the divinatory speech event very strong. In particular, the analysis focuses on a specific kind of speech acts, which seem to be built with the help of morphological devices that are normally used to indicate the source of information in the Quechua and Aymara language families. The same devices are used with a specific performative function in the context of divination: To “officialise” the message of the oracle and to oppose this to the speech acts of the diviner.

Keywords: Quechua, Ritual language, Aymara, Intentionality, Evidentiality
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.4.02bon
References
Aikhenvald, A.Y
(2004) Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, C
(1988) The hold life has. Coca and cultural identity in an Andean community. Washington/London: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J
(1962) How to do things with words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bascom, W
(1969) Ifa divination: Communication between gods and men in West Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, C
(1997) Ritual. Perspectives and dimensions. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bongiorno, V
in press) Ensayo sobre el lenguaje ritual. La adivinación en Quechua y en Aymara. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Cardona, R
(1976) Introduzione all’etnolinguistica. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
(1988) I sei lati del mondo. Linguaggio ed esperienza. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
(1989) Il proverbio africano. In Cristina Vallini (ed.), La pratica e la grammatica. Viaggio nella linguistica del proverbio. Napoli: Istituto Universitario Orientale. Dipartimento di studi letterari e linguistici dell’Occidente, pp. 31-42.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, R
(2000) Lingüística aimara. Cuzco: CBC.Google Scholar
de Beaugrande, A., and W. Dressler
(1981a) Introduction to Text Linguistics. London/New York: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1981b) Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Granda, G
(1996) El sistema de elementos gramaticales evidenciales o validadores en Quechua-Aru y Guaraní paraguayo. Estudio comparativo. Revista andina, año 12.2: 457-469.Google Scholar
du Bois, J
(1993) Meaning without intention. Lessons from divination. In Jane Hill, and Judith T. Irvine (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48-71.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A
(1992) Language in context and as context: The Samoan respect vocabulary. In Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 77-99.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fernández Juárez, G
(1996) El banquete aymara. La Paz: HISBOL.Google Scholar
Finnegan, R
(1969) How to do things with words: Performative utterances among the Limba of Sierra Leone. Man 4.4: 537-552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Floyd, R
(1997) La estructura categorial del quechua wanka. Lima: Instituto lingüístico de verano.Google Scholar
Gnerre, M
(1986) Il declino del dialogo: Il discorso cerimoniale e mitologico degli Shuar e degli Achuar. In Barbara Turchetta (ed.), Introduzione alla linguistica antropologica. Milano: Mursia, pp. 181-207. Original title: “The decline of dialogue: Ceremonial and mythological discourse among the Shuar and Achuar”. In Joel Sherzer, and Greg Urban (eds.), Native South American Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 307-342.Google Scholar
Grice, P
(1971) Meaning. In Danny Steinberg, and Leon Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53-59.Google Scholar
Hardman, M
(2001) Aymara. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
(1986) Data source marking in the Jaqi languages. In Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality. The linguistic codying of epistemology. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 113-136.Google Scholar
Hymes, D
(1972) Models of interaction of language and social life. In John Gumperz, and Dell Hymes (eds.), Direction in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 35-71.Google Scholar
Matthews, P.H
(1997) The concise Oxford dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Park, G.K
(1963) Divination and its social contexts. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, XCIII.2: 195-209.Google Scholar
Rappaport, R
(1998) Ritual und performative Sprache. In Andrea Belliger, and David Krieger (eds.), Ritualtheorien. Ein einführendes Handbuch. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, M
(2008) Einführung in die kognitive Linguistik. Tübingen: A.Francke.Google Scholar
Staal, F
(1996) [1990] Rules without meaning: Ritual, mantras and the human sciences. New Delhi: Narendra Prakash Jain.Google Scholar
Stolz, F., A. Debrunner, and W.P. Schmid
(1993) Storia della lingua latina. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar