This paper uses membership categorization analysis to illustrate how five women invoke multiple female gender and sexuality identity categories in personal narratives to construct the device of womanhood. The five racially diverse women include four self-identified lesbians and one heterosexual and range in age from mid-twenties to early forties. Analysis of their two hour audio recorded interaction illustrates that gender and sexuality cannot be understood as a binary difference between men and women. These women use revolutionary categories, defined on their own terms rather than by outsiders, to characterize women they encounter in their personal experience (lesbian and otherwise). The revolutionary categories exemplify a diversity of female gender and sexuality identities and ultimately challenge heteronormative conceptions of female identity while simultaneously constructing a lesbian counterpublic. Thus, the personal experiences of these women, as related through everyday narratives, turn out to be highly political.
(2004) Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society 331: 469-515. BoP
Butler Breese, E
(2011) Mapping the variety of public spheres. Communication Theory 211: 130-149.
Cameron, D
(2005) Language, gender, and sexuality: Current issues and new directions. Applied Linguistics 26.4: 482-502. BoP
Caudwell, J
(1999) Women’s football in the United Kingdom: Theorizing gender and unpacking the butch lesbian image. Journal of Sport and Social Issues 23.4: 390-402.
Connell, R.W., and J.W. Messerschmidt
(2005) Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society 19.6: 829-859.
Dori-Hacohen, G
(2012) “With whom do I have the pleasure?”: Callers’ categories in political talk radio programs. Journal of Pragmatics 44.3: 280-297.
Dori-Hacohen, G
(2013) “Rush, I love you”: Interactional fandom on American political talk-radio. International Journal of Communication 71: 2697-2719.
Eckert, P., and S. McConnell-Ginet
(1992) Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual review of anthropology 211: 461-490.
Eglin, P
(2002) Members’ gendering work:women’, feminists’ and membership categorization analysis. Discourse & Society 13.6: 819-825.
Elliot, H., Y. Gunaratnam, W. Holloway, and A. Phoenix
(2009) Practices, identification, and identity change in the transition to motherhood. In M. Wetherell (ed.), Theorizing identities and social action (19-37). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
(1995) The voices of Don Gabriel: Responsibility and self in a modern Mexicano narrative. In D. Tedlock, and B. Mannheim (eds.), The dialogic emergence of culture. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 97-147.
Hymes, D
(1962) The ethnography of speaking. In T. Gladwin, and W. Sturtevant (eds.), Anthropology and human behavior. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington, pp. 13-53.
Impett, E.A., D. Schooler, and D.L. Tolman
(2006) To be seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Archives of sexual behavior 35.2: 129-142.
Jefferson, G
(1991) List construction as a task and resource. In G. Psathas (ed.), Interactional competence. New York, NY: Irvington Publishers, pp. 63-92.
(2005a) Heteronormativity in action: Reproducing the heterosexual nuclear family in after-hours medical calls. Social Problems 52.4: 477-498.
Kitzinger, C
(2005b) “Speaking as a heterosexual”: (How) does sexuality matter for talk-in-interaction?. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38.3: 221-265.
Koven, M.E
(1998) Two languages in the self/the self in two languages: French-Portuguese bilinguals’ verbal enactments and experiences of self in narrative discourse. Ethos 26.4: 410-455.
Labov, W., and J. Waletzky
(1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, pp. 12-44.
Land, V., and C. Kitzinger
(2005) Speaking as a lesbian: Correcting the heterosexist presumption. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38.4: 371-416. BoP
Land, V., and C. Kitzinger
(2007) Contesting same-sex marriage in talk-in-interaction. Feminism & Psychology 17.2: 173-183.
Lazar, M.M
(2008) Language, communication and the public sphere: A perspective from feminist critical discourse analysis. In R. Wodak, and V. Koller (eds.), Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.89-110.
Leudar, I., V. Marsland, and J. Nekvapil
(2004) On membership categorization: ‘Us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse. Discourse and Society 15.2-3: 243-266.
Mandelbaum, J
(1987) Couples sharing stories. Communication Quarterly 35.2: 144-170.
Ochs, E
(1992) Indexing Gender. In A. Duranti, and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 335-358. BoP
Ochs, E
(2004) Narrative lessons. In A. Duranti, (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 269-289.
Philipsen, G
(1992) Speaking culturally: Explorations in social communication. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Sacks, H
(1974) On the analyzability of stories by children. In R. Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology. Middlesex, UK: Penguin, pp. 216-232.
Sacks, H
(1979) Hotrodder: A revolutionary category. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (7-14). New York, NY: Irvington Publishers.
Schegloff, E.A., G. Jefferson, and H. Sacks
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Linguistic Society of America 53.2: 361-382. BoP
Schiffrin, D
(1987) Discourse markers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Stokoe, E.H
(2003) Mothers, single women and sluts: Gender, morality and membership categorization in neighbour disputes. Feminism & Psychology 13.3: 317-344.
Speer, S.A., and E. Stokoe
(2011) Conversation and gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stokoe, E
(2012) Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies 141: 277-303.
Sutton, L.A
(1995) Bitches and skankly hobags: The place of women in contemporary slang. In K. Hall, and M. Bucholtz (eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 279-296.
Tannen, D
(1986) Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative. In F. Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech. Berlin, DE: Mouton, pp. 311-332.
(2009) When are persons ‘white’?: On some practical asymmetries of racial reference in talk-in-interaction. Discourse and Society 20.5: 613-641.
Wilkinson, S., and C. Kitzinger
(2003) Constructing identities: A feminist conversation analytic approach to positioning in action. In R. Harré, and F. Moghaddam (eds.), The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, pp. 157-180.
2021. “We’re family”: Japanese Characters’ Categorizations of a Gay Man in a TV Drama. In Linguistic Tactics and Strategies of Marginalization in Japanese, ► pp. 143 ff.
Shrikant, Natasha
2019. “Who’s the face?”: communication and white identity in a Texas business community. Ethnic and Racial Studies 42:2 ► pp. 254 ff.
Shrikant, Natasha
2022. Membership categorization analysis of racism in an online discussion among neighbors. Language in Society 51:2 ► pp. 237 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.