Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 26:1 (2016) ► pp.137–162

Debate with zhuangzi

Expository questions as fictive interaction blends in an old Chinese text

This study deals with the use of expository questions as discourse strategy in Zhuangzi (4th c. B.C.), a foundational text of Daoism. We treat this particular type of non-information-seeking questions (e.g. “Why? Because…”) as a manifestation of conversational monologues, which are themselves fictive kinds of interactions between the original writer and subsequent reader(s) (Pascual 2002, 2014). We further analyze expository questions as constructions of intersubjectivity (cf. Verhagen 2005, 2008), involving a viewpoint blend (Dancygier and Sweetser 2012), integrating the perspectives of the writer, the assumed readers and the discourse characters. We hope to show that–counter to what is commonly assumed in discourse studies–conversationalization is not restricted to modern institutional discourse (Fairclough 1994) or spoken informal speech (Streeck 2002).

Keywords: Zhuangzi, Conversational monologue, Expository questions, Intersubjectivity, Fictive interaction, Viewpoint blending
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.1.07xia
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail M
([1975] 1981) The dialogic imagination. M. Holquist (ed.), Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
([1979] 1986) Speech genres and other late essays. C. Emerson and M. Holquist (eds.), Vern W. McGee (trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Badarneh, Muhammad A
(2003)  The rhetorical question as a discursive and stylistic device in the Quran . Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin
(2005) Mental simulation in literal and figurative language understanding. In S. Coulson, and B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.), The literal and nonliteral in language and thought. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 255-278.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
(2012) Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin, and Nancy Chang
(2005) Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In J.-O. Östman, and M. Fried (eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 147-190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter
(2008) Underspecification and the noun/verb distinction: Late archaic Chinese and Khmer. In A. Steube (ed.), The discourse potential of underspecified structures. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 55-81.Google Scholar
(2013) Word-class systems between flexibility and rigidity: An integrative approach. In J. Rijkhoff, and E. van Lier (eds.), Flexible word classes: A typological study of underspecified parts of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 275-302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blondell, Ruby
(2002) The play of character in Plato's Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowery, Anne-Marie
(2007) Know thyself: Socrates as storyteller. In G.A. Scott (ed.), Philosophy in dialogue: Plato’s many devices. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 82-110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Line
(2008) A semiotic approach to fictive interaction as a representational strategy in communicative meaning construction. In T. Oakley, and A. Hougaard (eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 109-148. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2013) The communicative mind: A linguistic exploration of conceptual integration and meaning construction. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Brunye, Tad T., Tali Ditman, Caroline R. Mahoney, Holly A. Taylor, and Jason S. Augustyn
(2009) When you and I share perspectives: Pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science 20.1: 27-32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
(2013) Interaction in early modern news discourse: The case of English witchcraft pamphlets and their prefaces (1566–1621). Text & Talk 33.2: 167-188.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
forthcoming) Persuading and arguing with the reader: Fictive interaction as discourse organizing device in witchcraft pamphlet prefaces 1566-1621). In E. Pascual, and S. Sandler (eds.) The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins Publishing Company DOI logo
Chang, Suk-Jin
(1982) Non-standard questions: polarity and contrast. Language Research 181: 157-170.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Chen, Guying
(2007) Zhuangzi jinshi jinyi zuixin xiuding ban [Modern commentaries and translations of Zhuangzi] (newly revised edition). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Chuska, Kenneth R
(1995) Improving classroom questions: A teacher’s guide to increasing student motivation, participation and higher-level thinking. Bloomington, IN: Phi Beta Kappan Educational Foundation.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig
(1990) Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66.4: 764-805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Combs, Steven C
(2005) The Dao of rhetoric. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Cooren, François
(2010) Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2012) Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication 62.1: 1-20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
(2012) The language of stories: A cognitive approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, and Eve Sweetser
(eds.) (2012) Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W
(2014) Towards a dialogic syntax. In R. Giora, and J.W. Du Bois (Guest eds.), Special issue, ‘Dialogic resonance: Activating affinities across utterances’. Cognitive Linguistics 25.3: 359-410.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
(1994) Conversationalisation of public discourse and the authority of the consumer. In R. Keat, N. Whiteley, and N. Abercrombie (eds.), The authority of the consumer. London: Routledge, pp. 253-268.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
([1985] 1994) Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
(1994) Conceptual projection and middle spaces. UCSD Cognitive Science Technical Report 94011.Google Scholar
(1996) Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 113-130.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
(1998) Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 2.1: 133-187. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fung, Yu-lan
([1948] 1997) A short history of Chinese philosophy. David Bodde (ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
(1964) Chuang-Tsŭ: A new selected translation with an exposition of the philosophy of Kuo Hsiang (2nd edn.). New York: Paragon Book Reprint Corp.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., and Teenie Matlock
(2008) Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R.W. Gibbs (ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 161-176. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
(1983) Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1963) Behaviour in public places: Notes on the social organisation of gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon
(ed.) (2009) The end of dialogue in antiquity. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, Angus. C
([1979] 1990) How much of Chuang Tzu did Chuang Tzu write? In A.C. Graham (ed.), Studies in Chinese philosophy and philosophical literature. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 283-321.Google Scholar
Guo, Qingfan
([1894] 2013) Zhuangzi jishi [Collected commentaries on Zhuangzi]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.Google Scholar
Harvard-Yenching Institute
(1956) Zhuangzi yinde [A concordance to Zhuangzi]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, Vimala
(1999) Deictic projection and conceptual blending in epistolarity. Poetics Today 20.3: 523-541.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Herman, David
(2002) Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, Patrick C
(2013) How authors’ minds make stories. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Jian
(2013) Sixiang men: Xianqin zhuzi jiedu zending ben [The gate of ideas: Interpreting pre-Qin philosophers] (updated edn.). Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
(1999) Question-response argumentation in talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics 31.8: 975-999. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kearsley, Greg P
(1976) Questions and question asking in verbal discourse: A cross-disciplinary review. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5.4: 355-375. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
(1996) Sorry, I’m not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self. In G. Fauconnier, and E. Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, worlds and grammar. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 91-123.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisite. Stanford: Stanford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1999) Virtual reality. Studies in Linguistic Sciences 29.2: 77-103.Google Scholar
(2001) Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12.2: 143-188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Interactive cognition: Toward a unified account of structure, processing, and discourse. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 3.2: 95–125.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson
(1976) Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C.N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 457-489.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Liu, Kaihua
(2008) Zhonggu hanyu yiwenju yanjiu [A study on interrogatives in middle Chinese]. Harbin: Heilongjiang People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Liu, Xiaogan
(2015) Textual Issues in the Zhuangzi . In X. Liu (ed.), Dao companion to Daoist philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 129-157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, Xun
(1981) Han wenxueshi gangyao [Outline of the history of Chinese literature]. Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House.Google Scholar
Mair, Victor H
(2000) The Zhuangzi and its impact. In L. Kohn (ed.), Daoism handbook. Boston: Brill, pp. 30-52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mead, George H
([1934] 1955) Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Cynthia L
(1996) The representation of speech in biblical Hebrew narrative: A linguistic analysis. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, Todd, and Vera Tobin
(2014) The whole is sometimes less than the sum of its parts: Toward a theory of document acts. Language and Cognition 6.1: 79-110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ong, Walter J
([1982] 2002) Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Pagán Cánovas, Cristóbal, and Mark Turner
forthcoming) Generic integration templates for fictive communication. In E. Pascual, and S. Sandler (eds.) The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins Publishing Company
Pascual, Esther
(2002) Imaginary trialogues: Conceptual blending and fictive interaction in criminal courts. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
(2006a) Fictive interaction within the sentence: A communicative type of fictivity in grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17.2: 245-267. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Questions in legal monologues: Fictive interaction as argumentative strategy in a murder trial. Text & Talk 26.3: 383-402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008a) Text for context, trial for trialogue: A fieldwork study of a fictive interaction blend. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 61: 50-82. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2008b) Fictive interaction blends in everyday life and courtroom settings. In T. Oakley, and A. Hougaard (eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 79-107. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2014) Fictive interaction: The conversation frame in thought, language, and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual, Esther, and Sergeiy Sandler
(eds.) forthcoming The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins Publishing Company DOI logo
Piaget, Jean
([1959] 2005) Jean Piaget: Selected works, vol. 5: The language and thought of the child (3rd edn.). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G
(1995) Outline of classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Recanati, François
(1995) Le présent épistolaire: Une perspective cognitive. L’information Grammaticale 661: 38-44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roth, Harold
(2008) Zhuangzi. In E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. [[URL]].Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, and Penelope Brown
(1976) The origins of syntax in discourse: A case study of Tok Pisin relatives. Language 521: 631-666. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sarles, Harvey B
(1977) Language and human nature. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 71: 289–327. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A.M
(2010) Language from within, vol. 2: The logic of language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanfield, Robert A., and Rolf A. Zwaan
(2001) The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science 12.2: 153-156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen
(2002) Grammars, words, and embodied meanings. Journal of Communication 52.3: 581-596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
([1996] 2000) Fictive motion in language and ‘ception.’ In Toward a cognitive semantics: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 99-175.Google Scholar
Tobin, Vera
(2014) Readers as overhearers and texts as objects: Joint attention in reading communities. Scripta 18.34: 179-198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Mark
(2010) Ten lectures on mind and language by Mark Turner. F. Li, Y. Ding, and Y. Gao (eds.). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
(2005) Construction of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Intersubjectivity and the architecture of the language system. In J. Zlatev, R. Timothy, C. Sinha, and E. Itkonen (eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 307-331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vis, Kirsten
(2011)  Subjectivity in news discourse: A corpus linguistic analysis of informalization . Ph.D. Dissertation, VU Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vis, Kirsten, José Sanders, and Wilbert Spooren
(2012) Diachronic changes in subjectivity and stance - A corpus linguistic study of Dutch news texts. Discourse, Context and Media 11: 95-102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Bo
(2013) The philosophy of Chuang Tzu (2nd ed.). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Rongpei
(trans.) (1999) Zhuangzi. Changsha: Hunan People's Publishing House and Beijing: Foreign Language Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Burton
([1968] 2013) The complete works of Zhuangzi. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Xiang, Mingjian
forthcoming) Real, imaginary or fictive? Philosophical dialogues in the pictorial version of an early Daoist text. In E. Pascual, and S. Sandler (eds.) The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins Publishing Company
Yang, Bojun, and He Leshi
(2001) Guhanyu yufa ji qi fazhan [A grammar of ancient Chinese and its development] (revised edn.). Beijing: Language & Culture Press.Google Scholar
Ye, Chengyi
([1979] 2004) Zhuangzi yuyan yanjiu [A study on fables in Zhuangzi]. Taipei: Wenshizhe Publishing House.Google Scholar
Yi, Mengchun
(2005) Xianqin hanyu yufa [Grammar of pre-Qin classical Chinese]. Changsha: Hunan Education Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Mosheng
([1948] 2007) Zhuangzi xinshi [A new interpretation of Zhuangzi]. Beijing: New World Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha, and Esa Itkonen
(eds.) (2008) The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Dornelas, Aline & Esther Pascual
2016. Echolalia as communicative strategy. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55], ► pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Jarque, Maria Josep & Esther Pascual
2021. From gesture- and sign-in-interaction to grammar: Fictive questions for relative clauses in signed languages. Languages and Modalities 1 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Sandler, Sergeiy & Esther Pascual
2017. In the Beginning There Was Conversation: Fictive Direct Speech in the Hebrew Bible. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Wilson, Anna
2020. It’s Time to Do News Again. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 68:4 ► pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Xiang, Mingjian
2016. Real, imaginary, or fictive?. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55], ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Xiang, Mingjian & Bosen Ma
2020. Chapter 12. How can I persuade you without making self-assertions?. In Language, Culture and Identity – Signs of Life [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 13], ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Yuan, Ai
2022. Rhetorical Questions in the Daodejing: Argument Construction, Dialogical Insertion, and Sentimental Expression. Religions 13:3 ► pp. 252 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Fictive Interaction [Human Cognitive Processing, 47], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.