Debate with zhuangzi
Expository questions as fictive interaction blends in an old Chinese text
This study deals with the use of expository questions as discourse strategy in Zhuangzi (4 th c. B.C.), a foundational text of Daoism. We treat this particular type of non-information-seeking questions (e.g. “Why? Because…”) as a manifestation of conversational monologues, which are themselves fictive kinds of interactions between the original writer and subsequent reader(s) (Pascual 2002, 2014). We further analyze expository questions as constructions of intersubjectivity (cf. Verhagen 2005, 2008), involving a viewpoint blend (Dancygier and Sweetser 2012), integrating the perspectives of the writer, the assumed readers and the discourse characters. We hope to show that–counter to what is commonly assumed in discourse studies–conversationalization is not restricted to modern institutional discourse (Fairclough 1994) or spoken informal speech (Streeck 2002).
Keywords: Zhuangzi, Conversational monologue, Expository questions, Intersubjectivity, Fictive interaction, Viewpoint blending
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 March 2016
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
Badarneh, Muhammad A.
(2003) The rhetorical question as a discursive and stylistic device in the Quran . Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University. MetBib
(2005) Mental simulation in literal and figurative language understanding. In S. Coulson, and B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.), The literal and nonliteral in language and thought. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 255-278. MetBib
(2012) Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books. MetBib
Bergen, Benjamin, and Nancy Chang
(2008) A semiotic approach to fictive interaction as a representational strategy in communicative meaning construction. In T. Oakley, and A. Hougaard (eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 109-148. BoP
Brunye, Tad T., Tali Ditman, Caroline R. Mahoney, Holly A. Taylor, and Jason S. Augustyn
(2013) Interaction in early modern news discourse: The case of English witchcraft pamphlets and their prefaces (1566–1621). Text & Talk 33.2: 167-188. BoP
(1982) Non-standard questions: polarity and contrast. Language Research 18: 157-170. BoP
Chuska, Kenneth R.
Clark, Herbert H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig
(2010) Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
Dancygier, Barbara, and Eve Sweetser
Du Bois, John W.
( 1994) Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
(1996) Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 113-130. MetBib
(1998) Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 2.1: 133-187. MetBib
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books. BoP
Gibbs, Raymond W., and Teenie Matlock
(2008) Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R.W. Gibbs (ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 161-176. MetBib
(1983) Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
Graham, Angus. C.
(1999) Deictic projection and conceptual blending in epistolarity. Poetics Today 20.3: 523-541. MetBib
(1999) Question-response argumentation in talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics 31.8: 975-999. BoP
Kearsley, Greg P.
(1976) Questions and question asking in verbal discourse: A cross-disciplinary review. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5.4: 355-375. BoP
(1996) Sorry, I’m not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self. In G. Fauconnier, and E. Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, worlds and grammar. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 91-123. MetBib
Langacker, Ronald W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisite. Stanford: Stanford University Press. BoP
(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press. BoP
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson
(1976) Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C.N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 457-489. BoP
Mair, Victor H.
Mead, George H.
Miller, Cynthia L.
Oakley, Todd, and Vera Tobin
Ong, Walter J.
( 2002) Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London/New York: Routledge. BoP
Pagán Cánovas, Cristóbal, and Mark Turner
forthcoming) Generic integration templates for fictive communication. In E. Pascual, and S. Sandler (eds.) The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins Publishing Company
(2006a) Fictive interaction within the sentence: A communicative type of fictivity in grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17.2: 245-267. BoP
(2008a) Text for context, trial for trialogue: A fieldwork study of a fictive interaction blend. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6: 50-82. BoP
(2008b) Fictive interaction blends in everyday life and courtroom settings. In T. Oakley, and A. Hougaard (eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 79-107. BoP
Pascual, Esther, and Sergeiy Sandler
Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
(2008) Zhuangzi. In E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. [http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/zhuangzi/].
Sankoff, Gillian, and Penelope Brown
(1976) The origins of syntax in discourse: A case study of Tok Pisin relatives. Language 52: 631-666. BoP
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 7: 289–327. BoP
Seuren, Pieter A.M.
Stanfield, Robert A., and Rolf A. Zwaan
Vis, Kirsten, José Sanders, and Wilbert Spooren
forthcoming) Real, imaginary or fictive? Philosophical dialogues in the pictorial version of an early Daoist text. In E. Pascual, and S. Sandler (eds.) The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins Publishing Company
Yang, Bojun, and He Leshi
Zlatev, Jordan, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha, and Esa Itkonen
(eds.) (2008) The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
Cited by 6 other publications
Dornelas, Aline & Esther Pascual
Sandler, Sergeiy & Esther Pascual
Xiang, Mingjian & Bosen Ma
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.