Article published In:
PragmaticsVol. 26:4 (2016) ► pp.653–674
Management discourse in university administrative documents in Sweden
How it recontextualizes and fragments scholarly practices and work processes
Studies in CDA have revealed the nature of the marketized language that now infuses universities and other public institutions, but there is no comprehensive study as to how this language enters the everyday practices of the university through different levels of steering documents and meetings. In this paper, taking one example from a corpus of data from a larger project on New Public Management in Sweden, we show how successively more detailed documents are created by professional administrators in order to present vision statements, that are first operationalized into strategies and then into more concrete ‘activities’ for the subject level that are related to bundles of performance indicators. These documents re-contextualize practices of teaching and research in line with marketized goals, yet do so through consistent lack of clear agency, causality and process. A number of linguistic and multimodal resources are deployed in a chain of interrelated documents legitimizing this process as one made by careful, technical, management expertise, although the result is a fragmentation of the actual interconnected processes that comprise university work.
Keywords: universities, marketization, new public management, management, multimodality, recontextualization of social practice, critical discourse analysis
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Parding, K., L. Abrahamsson, and A. Jansson
(2012) New conditions for identities, cultures and governance of welfare sector professionals: The teaching profession. Ephemera 12.3: 294–308.
Alvesson, M.
(2013) The Triumph of Emptiness: Consumption, Higher Education, and Work Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Andersson, T., and S. Tengblad
(2009) When complexity meets culture: New public management and the Swedish police. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 6.1/2: 41–56. 
Ball, S.J.
(2004) Education for sale! The commodification of everything? King´s Annual Education Lecture. University of London, June 2014, 2004 [URL] (accessed January 27, 2014).
Bergström, O., and D. Knights
(2006) Organizational discourse and subjectivity. Subjectification during processes of recruitment. Human Relations 59.3: 351–377.
Caldas-Coulthard, C.R., and M. Coulthard
(1996) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical, Discourse. London: Routledge.
Chiapello E., and N. Fairclough
(2002) Understanding the new management ideology: A transdisciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and the new sociology of capitalism. Discourse & Society 13/2: 185–208.
Davies, B., and P. Bansel
(2007) Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 20/3: 247–259.
Ek, A.-C., M. Ideland, S. Jönsson, and C. Malmberg
(2013) The tension between marketisation and academisation in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 38.9: 1305–1318.
Fairclough, N.
(1993) Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society 4.2: 133–168.
(2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M.
(1977) Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon Books
Hall, P.
(2012) Managementbyråkrati - organisationspolitisk makt i svensk offentlig förvaltning. Malmö: Liber.
Halliday, M.A.K.
(1987) Language as Social Semiotic. London: Hodder.
Hedegaard, J., and H. Ahl
(2013) The gender subtext of new public management-based work practices in Swedish health care. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion 32.2: 144–156.
Hellberg, S.
(1998) Konflikter i grundskolans kursplaner för svenska. Språk och stil 181: 5–37.
Hodge, B., and G. Kress
(1988) Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Holborow, M.
(2013) Applied linguistics in the neoliberal university: Ideological keywords and social agency. Applied Linguistics Review 4.2: 229–257.
Iedema, R.
(2003).Discourses of Post-Bureaucratic Organization. Document Design Companion Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
Johnson, M.
(1987) The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press.
Kärreman, D., and M. Alvesson
(2004) Cages in tandem: Management control, social identity, and identification in a knowledge-intensive firm. Organization 11.1: 149–175.
Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen
(2006) Reading Images: A Grammar Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Machin, D.
(2004) Building the world’s visual language: The increasing global importance of image banks in corporate media. Visual Communication 3.3: 316–336.
Machin, D., and A. Mayr
(2012) How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis. A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.
Mautner, G.
(2005) The entrepreneurial university. A discursive profile of a higher education buzzword. Critical Discourse Studies 2.2: 95–120.
(2014) The privatisation of the public realm: A critical perspective on practice and discourse. In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, Hrsg. C. Hart and P. Cap. London etc.: Bloomsbury Continuum, pp. 463–479.
Morrish, L, and H. Sauntson
(2010) Vision, values and international excellence: The products that the university mission statements sell to students. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, and L. Nixon (eds.), The student as a consumer and the marketization of higher education. London: Routledge, pp. 73–85.
Peters, M., A.C. Besley, M. Olssen, S. Maurere, and S. Weber
(eds.) (2009) Governmentality Studies in Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Pollitt, C., and G. Bouchaert
(2013) Public Management Reform - a Comparative Analysis. New Public Management, Governance, and Neo-Weberian State, 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Power, M.
(1997) The audit society: Rituals of verification. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
van Dijk, T.A.
(1993) Principles of discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 4.2: 249–283.
(1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
van Leeuwen, T.
(1999) The representation of social actors. In C.R. Caldas-Coulthard, and M. Coulthard (eds.), Texts and Practices - Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 32–71.
(2008) Discourse and Practice. London: Routledge.
van Leeuwen, T., and R. Wodak
(1999) Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies 1.1: 83–119.
Vision
2016 Örebro universitet. [URL] (accessed October 3, 2014).
Waring, J.
(2009) Constructing and re-constructing narratives of patient safety. Social Science & Medicine 69.12: 1722–31.
Westerberg A.I., and B. Jacobsson
(2013) Staten och granskningssamhället. Huddinge: Södertörns högskola.
Zhang, J., and K. O’Halloran
(2013) Toward a global knowledge enterprise: University websites as portals to the ongoing marketization of higher education. Critical Discourse Studies 10/4: 468–485.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Deng, Yi & Dezheng (William) Feng
2021. Academic capitalization and public relations communication in higher education: a diachronic genre analysis of university annual reports in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education ► pp. 1 ff. 
Hearn, Jeff
2017. Neoliberal Universities, Patriarchies, Masculinities, and Myself: Transnational-personal Reflections on and from the Global North. Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 18:1 ► pp. 16 ff.
Kroon, Åsa
2020. Converting gambling to philanthropy and acts of patriotism: The case of “The world’s most Swedish gambling company”. Discourse, Context & Media 34 ► pp. 100381 ff.
Tatyyeva, Zhansaya & Aliya Zagidullina
2023. Comparative discourse analysis of Kazakhstani universities’ organisational identity. Discourse & Communication 17:4 ► pp. 494 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.