Article published in:
Vol. 27:2 (2017) ► pp. 207234


Manipulation as an ideological tool in the political genre of Parliamentary discourses


Allott, Nicholas
2013 “Relevance Theory.” In Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics, ed. by Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo, and Marco Carapezza, Vol. 2, 57–98. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blass, Regina
2005 “Manipulation in the Speeches and Writings of Hitler and the NSDAP from a Relevance Theoretic Point of View.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind, ed. by Louis de Saussure, and Peter Schulz, Vol. 17, 169–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinker, Klaus
1997Linguistische Textanalyse: Eine Einfuehrung in Grundbegriff und Methoden. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Cué, Carlos E., Miguel Jiménez, and Jose M. Moreno
2013 “Rajoy Appears more often in Bárcenas’ Ledgers than other PP Officials.” In El País. Available at: http://​elpais​.com​/elpais​/2013​/02​/03​/inenglish​/1359913280​_152138​.html (accessed April 3rd, 2015).
Dörnyei, Zoltán
2007Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Philip, Thomas Keenam, and Anne M. Dowd
2004 “A Call to Arms at the End of History: A Discourse-Historical Analysis of George W. Bush’s Declaration of War of Terror.” Discourse and Society 15 (2–3): 199–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2010Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1995Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leudar, Ivan, Victoria Marsland, and Jirí Nekvapil
2004 “On Membership Categorization: ‘Us’, ‘Them’ and ‘Doing Violence’ in Political Discourse.” Discourse and Society 15 (2–3): 243–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maillat, Didier, and Steve Oswald
2007 “Defining Manipulative Discourse: The Pragmatics of Cognitive Illusions.” International Review of Pragmatics 1: 348–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, Luisa
2000 “Enfrentamiento y consenso en los debates parlamentarios sobre política de inmigración en España [Confrontation and consensus in parliamentary debates about immigration policy in Spain].” Oralia 3: 113–148.Google Scholar
Martín Rojo, Luisa, and Teun A. van Dijk
1997 “’There was a Problem, and it was Solved!’: Legitimazing the Expulsion of ‘Illegal’ Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse and Society 8 (4): 523–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James, and Peter R. R. White
2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oddo, John
2011 “War Legitimation Discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Four US Presidential Addresses.” Discourse and Society 22 (3): 287–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, de Louis
2005 “Manipulation and Cognitive Pragmatics: Preliminary Hypotheses.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language and Mind, ed. by Louis Saussure and Peter Schultz, Vol. 17, 113–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, de Louis, and Peter Schulz
2005 “Introduction.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language and Mind, ed. by Louis Saussure, and Peter Schulz, Vol. 17, 1–9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Şimon, Simona
2008 “The Pragmatic Structure of Written Advertisements.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Professional Communication and Translation Studies: Politehnica University of Timişoara, ed. by R. Superceanu and Daniel Dejica, Vol. 1, 51–58. Timişoara: Politehnica Publishing House.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan
1994 “Understanding Verbal Understanding.” In What is Intelligence? ed. by Jean Khalfa, 179–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2000 “Introduction.” In Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, 3–16. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995 [1986]Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
1992 [1977]Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2000 “News Racism: A Discourse Analytical Approach.” In Ethnic Minorities and the Media, ed. by Simon Cottle, 33–49. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 95–120. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Ideología y discurso: Una introducción multidisciplinaria [Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction]. 2ª edición. Barcelona: Ariel Lingüística.Google Scholar
2005a “Contextualization in Parliamentary Discourse: Aznar, Iraq and the Pragmatics of Lying.” Congreso Discurso Oral, Almería 24th–26th November 2005 Available at: http://​www​.discursos​.org/ (accessed 17th February 2015).
2005b “War Rhetoric of a Little Ally.” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (1): 65–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse and Society 17 (2): 359–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “The Role of the Press in the Reproduction of Racism.” In Migrations: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Michi Messer, 15–29. Vienna: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans
2005 “Foreword: Preview by Review.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language and Mind, ed. by Louis Saussure, and Peter Schulz, ix–xvi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2000 “Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication.” In Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Dan Sperber, 411–448. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Rheindorf, Markus
2019.  In Revisiting the Toolbox of Discourse Studies,  pp. 129 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.