Article published In:
PragmaticsVol. 27:2 (2017) ► pp.207–234
Manipulation as an ideological tool in the political genre of Parliamentary discourses
The present study analyzes the discursive strategies of manipulation in the political genre of a discourse in Parliament with an aim to convince the audience that the Prime Minister and his party are innocent of receiving illegal cash donations from a slush fund run in the party. For that purpose, we have used Van Dijk’s (2006) scheme of strategies of manipulation at several levels of discourse (content, lexis, topics, syntax, rhetoric, and order of discourse). Findings of the study show that the Prime Minister’s speech presents characteristics of ideological discourse, since it follows a general strategy of positive in-group and negative out-group presentation, which has an overall legitimating function. At other levels of discourse, the denial of controversial actions is made manipulative by following strategies of emphasis of our positive and their negative actions with the final aim of self-legitimating himself and his discourse. The discourse is further made manipulative by using appropriate contextual constraints and defensible semantics of representation.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The concept of manipulation
- 3.Social-political manipulation as an ideological tool
- 4.Mariano Rajoy’s speech in Parliament (1st August 2013): The political context
- 5.Methodology
- 6.Results
- 7.Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
References
Allott, Nicholas
2013 “Relevance Theory.” In Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics, ed. by Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo, and Marco Carapezza, Vol. 21, 57–98. New York: Springer. 
Blass, Regina
2005 “Manipulation in the Speeches and Writings of Hitler and the NSDAP from a Relevance Theoretic Point of View.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind, ed. by Louis de Saussure, and Peter Schulz, Vol. 171, 169–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brinker, Klaus
1997 Linguistische Textanalyse: Eine Einfuehrung in Grundbegriff und Methoden. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Cué, Carlos E., Miguel Jiménez, and Jose M. Moreno
2013 “Rajoy Appears more often in Bárcenas’ Ledgers than other PP Officials.” In El País. Available at: [URL] (accessed April 3rd, 2015).
Dörnyei, Zoltán
2007 Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Graham, Philip, Thomas Keenam, and Anne M. Dowd
2004 “A Call to Arms at the End of History: A Discourse-Historical Analysis of George W. Bush’s Declaration of War of Terror.” Discourse and Society 15 (2–3): 199–221.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2010 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leech, Geoffrey
1995 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leudar, Ivan, Victoria Marsland, and Jirí Nekvapil
2004 “On Membership Categorization: ‘Us’, ‘Them’ and ‘Doing Violence’ in Political Discourse.” Discourse and Society 15 (2–3): 243–266.
Maillat, Didier, and Steve Oswald
2007 “Defining Manipulative Discourse: The Pragmatics of Cognitive Illusions.” International Review of Pragmatics 11: 348–370.
Martín Rojo, Luisa
2000 “Enfrentamiento y consenso en los debates parlamentarios sobre política de inmigración en España [Confrontation and consensus in parliamentary debates about immigration policy in Spain].” Oralia 31: 113–148.
Martín Rojo, Luisa, and Teun A. van Dijk
1997 “’There was a Problem, and it was Solved!’: Legitimazing the Expulsion of ‘Illegal’ Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse and Society 8 (4): 523–566.
Martin, James, and Peter R. R. White
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Oddo, John
2011 “War Legitimation Discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Four US Presidential Addresses.” Discourse and Society 22 (3): 287–314.
Saussure, de Louis
2005 “Manipulation and Cognitive Pragmatics: Preliminary Hypotheses.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language and Mind, ed. by Louis Saussure and Peter Schultz, Vol. 171, 113–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Saussure, de Louis, and Peter Schulz
2005 “Introduction.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language and Mind, ed. by Louis Saussure, and Peter Schulz, Vol. 171, 1–9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Searle, John R.
1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Şimon, Simona
2008 “The Pragmatic Structure of Written Advertisements.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Professional Communication and Translation Studies: Politehnica University of Timişoara, ed. by R. Superceanu and Daniel Dejica, Vol. 11, 51–58. Timişoara: Politehnica Publishing House.
Sperber, Dan
1994 “Understanding Verbal Understanding.” In What is Intelligence? ed. by Jean Khalfa, 179–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(ed.) 2000 “Introduction.” In Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, 3–16. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995 [1986] Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Van Dijk, Teun
1992 [1977] Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London/New York: Longman.
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
2000 “News Racism: A Discourse Analytical Approach.” In Ethnic Minorities and the Media, ed. by Simon Cottle, 33–49. Buckingham: Open University Press.
2001 “Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 95–120. London: Sage.
2003 Ideología y discurso: Una introducción multidisciplinaria [Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction]. 2ª edición. Barcelona: Ariel Lingüística.
2005a “Contextualization in Parliamentary Discourse: Aznar, Iraq and the Pragmatics of Lying.” Congreso Discurso Oral, Almería 24th–26th November 2005 Available at: [URL] (accessed 17th February 2015).
2006 “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse and Society 17 (2): 359–383.
2012 “The Role of the Press in the Reproduction of Racism.” In Migrations: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Michi Messer, 15–29. Vienna: Springer.
Van Eemeren, Frans
2005 “Foreword: Preview by Review.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language and Mind, ed. by Louis Saussure, and Peter Schulz, ix–xvi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wilson, Deirdre
2000 “Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication.” In Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Dan Sperber, 411–448. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Chiluwa, Isioma M., Ikenna Kamalu & Steve Anurudu
2022. Deceptive transparency and masked discourses in Ponzi schemes: a critical discourse analysis of MMM Nigeria. Critical Discourse Studies 19:1 ► pp. 55 ff. 
Kakisina, Peggy A., Tantri R. Indhiarti & Muchamad Sholakhuddin Al Fajri
2022. Discursive Strategies of Manipulation in COVID-19 Political Discourse: The Case of Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro. SAGE Open 12:1 ► pp. 215824402210798 ff.
Malko, A.V. & V.V. Subochev
2021. Political and legal Manipulation as a Psychological Phenomenon and a Scientific Category. Psychology and Law 11:1 ► pp. 163 ff.
Rheindorf, Markus
2019. Combining Analyses at Different Levels of Discourse. In Revisiting the Toolbox of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 129 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.