Article published In:
PragmaticsVol. 27:2 (2017) ► pp.235–256
Avoiding initiation of repair in L2 conversations-for-learning
Using audio-recorded data from second language (L2) English conversations-for-learning between an L2 user of English and a first language (L1) user of English (the researcher), this study analyzes cases in which the L1 user avoids initiation of repair. In each case, the L2 user appears to have misunderstood something said by the L1 user. Instead of initiating repair in next turn on the L2 user’s talk, or in third position on his own talk, the L1 user goes along, at least briefly, with the direction set by the L2 user. Often, the L1 user, sooner or later, returns to the misunderstood talk. Avoidance of repair initiation is one way in which the L1 user contributes to the construction of the L2 user as interactionally competent to participate in conversations-for-learning.
Keywords: avoidance, conversation-for-learning, initiation of repair, interactional competence, next-turn repair, third-position repair
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Avoiding initiation of repair
- 3.Interactional competence as locally constructed
- 4.Data and method
- 5.Initiation of repair in next turn and third position
- 6.Instances of avoiding initiation of repair
- 7.Discussion – intersubjectivity and construction of interactional competence
- 8.Concluding remarks
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References
Bolden, Galina B.
2006 “Little Words that Matter: Discourse Markers “so” and “oh” and the Doing of Other-Attentiveness in Social Interaction.” Journal of Communication 561: 661–688. 
Drew, Paul
1997 “ ‘Open’ Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 281: 69–101.
Enfield, N.J.
2009 The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erickson, Frederick
2004 Talk and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ferguson, Charles A.
1975 “Toward a Characterization of English Foreigner Talk.” Anthropological Linguistics 171: 1–14.
Firth, Alan
1996 “The Discursive Accomplishment of Normality. On ‘Lingua Franca’ English and Conversation Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 261: 237–259.
Hall, Joan Kelly, John Hellermann, and Simona Pekarek Doehler
(eds.) 2011 L2 Interactional Competence and Development. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Hauser, Eric
2003 ‘Corrective Recasts’ and Other-Correction of Language Form in Interaction among Native and Non-Native Speakers of English: The Application of Conversation Analysis to Second Language Acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.
2013a “Stability and Change in One Adult’s Second Language English Negation.” Language Learning 631: 463–498.
2013b “Expanding Resources for Marking Direct Reported Speech.” In Pragmatics & Language Learning, Vol. 131, ed. by Tim Greer, Donna Tatsuki, and Carsten Roever, 29–53. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaiʻi, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
2016 “The Construction of Interactional Incompetence in L2 Interaction.” Paper presented at The Teaching and Testing of L2 Interactional Competence Symposium, Rice University, Houston, TX.
He, Agnes Weiyun, and Richard Young
1998 “Language Proficiency Interviews: A Discourse Approach.” In Talking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency, ed. by Richard Young, and Agnes Weiyun He, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heinrich, Patrick
2012 The Making of Monolingual Japan: Language Ideology and Japanese Modernity. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Heritage, John
1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1998 “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society 271: 291–334.
Hymes, Dell
1974 Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Jefferson, Gail
1987 “On Exposed and Embedded Correction in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and John R. E. Lee, 86–100. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Johnson, Karen E.
1995 Understanding Communication in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kinzinger, Celia
2013 “Repair.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 229–256. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Liberman, Ken
1980 “Ambiguity and Gratuitous Concurrence in Inter-Cultural Communication.” Human Studies 31: 65–85.
2012 “Semantic Drift in Conversations.” Human Studies 351: 263–277.
Long, Michael H.
1983 “Native Speaker/Non-Native Speaker Conversation and the Negotiation of Comprehensible Input.” Applied Linguistics 41: 126–141.
Nguyen, Hanh thi, and Gabriele Kasper
(eds.) 2009 Talk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaiʻi, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Raymond, Geoffrey
2003 “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 681: 939–967.
Sacks, Harvey
2004 “An Initial Characterization of the Organization of Speaker Turn-Taking in Conversation.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 35–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 501: 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1972 “Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 75–119. New York: The Free Press.
1992 “Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 971: 1295–1345. [URL]
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
1977 “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 531: 361–382.
Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey D. Robinson
2006 “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society 351: 367–392.
Tanaka, Hiroko
1999 Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tyler, Andrea
1995 “The Coconstruction of Cross-Cultural Miscommunication: Conflicts in Perception, Negotiation, and Enactment of Participant Role and Status.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 171: 129–152.
Walsh, Steve
2012 “Conceptualising Classroom Interactional Competence.” Novitas-ROYAL 61: 1–14.
Wootton, Anthony
1975 Dilemmas of Discourse: Controversies about the Sociological Interpretation of Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
AL MASAEED, KHALED
2020. Translanguaging in L2 Arabic Study Abroad: Beyond Monolingual Practices in Institutional Talk. The Modern Language Journal 104:1 ► pp. 250 ff. 
Arano, Yusuke
2018. Post-other-correction repeat: Aspects of a third-position action in correction sequences. Journal of Pragmatics 136 ► pp. 5 ff.
Arano, Yusuke
2019. Interculturality as an interactional achievement: Doubting others’ nationality and accounting for the doubt. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 12:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Chen, Mia Huimin & Shelly Xueting Ye
2022. Extending repair in peer interaction: A conversation analytic study. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Nanbu, Zachary & Tim Greer
2023. Creating Obstacles to Progressivity: Task Expansion in Second Language Role‐Plays. TESOL Quarterly 57:4 ► pp. 1364 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.