Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 27:4 (2017) ► pp.479–506

The use of discourse markers but and so by native English speakers and Chinese speakers of English

| Nankai University, China

Previous studies have found that but and so occur frequently in native and non-native English speakers’ speech and that they are easy to acquire by non-native English speakers. The current study compared ideational and pragmatic functions of but and so by native and non-native speakers of English. Data for the study were gathered using individual sociolinguistic interviews with five native English speakers and ten L1 Chinese speakers. The results suggest that even though the Chinese speakers of English acquired the ideational functions of but and so as well as the native English speakers, they underused the pragmatic functions of them. The findings indicate that there is still a gap between native and non-native English speakers in communicative competence in the use of but and so. The present study also suggests that speakers’ L1 (Mandarin Chinese) and overall oral proficiency in oral discourse affect their use of but and so.

Keywords: discourse marker, interlanguage, communicative competence, Chinese, oral proficiency, but, so
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Discourse markers
  • 2.Analytical framework of the study
  • 3.Literature review
    • 3.1Communicative competence and L2 DMs
    • 3.2Previous studies on ‘but’ and ‘so’ by L2 learners
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Data collection
  • 5.Discourse marker categorization
    • 5.1Categorizing ‘but’
    • 5.2Categorizing danshi ‘but’
    • 5.3Categorizing ‘so’
    • 5.4Categorizing suoyi ‘so’
    • 5.5An overview of qualitative results
  • 6.Statistical evidence on the use of discourse markers
    • 6.1Statistical findings by English and Chinese speakers
    • 6.2Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 3 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.4.01liu
References
Aijmer, Karin
1997 “ I think: An English Modal Particle.” In Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspective, ed. by Toril Swan, and Olaf Jansen Westvik, 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Pragmatic Markers in Spoken Interlanguage.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 31: 173–190. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “ Well I’m not sure I think… The Use of Well by Non-Native Speakers.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 161: 231–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bachman, Lyle F.
1990 Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, Lyle F., and Adrian S. Palmer
2010 Language Assessment in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Nicole, and Juliane House
2010 “ I think and I don’t know in English as Lingua Franca and Native English Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 1184–1200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, David M.
1998 “Cancellative Discourse Markers: A Core/periphery Approach.” Pragmatics 81: 515–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1988 “ ‘So’ as a Constraint on Relevance.” In Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality, ed. by Ruth M. Kempson, 183–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996 Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buysse, Lieven
2012 “ So as a Multifunctional Discourse Marker in Native and Learner Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1764–1782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canale, Michael, and Merrill Swain
1980 “Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing.” Applied Linguistics 11: 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fang, Mei
2000 “Ziran kouyu zhong ruohua lianci de huayu biaoji gongneng [Reduced conjunctions as discourse markers]”. Zhongguo Yuwen [Chinese language] 51: 459–470.Google Scholar
Frank-Job, Barbara
2006 “A Dynamic – Interactional Approach to Discourse Markers.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 395–413. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fung, Loretta
2011 “Discourse Markers in the ESL Classroom: A Survey of Teachers’ Attitudes.” Asian EFL Journal 131: 199–248.Google Scholar
Fung, Loretta, and Ronald Carter
2007 “Discourse Markers and Spoken English: Native and Learner Use in Pedagogic Settings.” Applied Linguistics 281: 410–439.Emerald Group DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
1970 “Language Structure and Language Function.” In New Horizons in Linguistics, ed. by John Lyons, 140–165. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
2008 Particles at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues. Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
Hays, Paul R.
1992 “Discourse Markers and L2 Acquisition.” Papers in Applied Linguistics-Michigan 71: 24–34.Google Scholar
He, Anping, and Manfei Xu
2003 “Zhongguo daxuesheng yingyu kouyu small words de yanjiu [Small words in Chinese EFL learners’ spoken English].” Waiyu Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu [Foreign language teaching and research] 351: 446–452.Google Scholar
Hedge, Tricia
2000 Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2013 “On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?” Linguistics 511: 1205–1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell
1972 “On Communicative Competence.” In Sociolinguistics, ed. by John B. Pride, and Janet Holmes, 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Jones, Christian, and Ronald Carter
2014 “Teaching Spoken Discourse Markers Explicitly: A Comparison of III and PPP.” International Journal of English Studies 141: 37–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
1993 “The Discourse Marker Well: A Relevance-Theoretical Account.” Journal of Pragmatics 191: 435–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Sara W. Smith
1998 “ And People Just you Know like ‘Wow’: Discourse Markers as Negotiating Strategies.” In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Yael Ziv, 171–201. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Yael Ziv
(eds) 1998 Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lam, Phoenix W. Y.
2010 “The Effect of Text Type on the Use of So as a Discourse Particle.” Discourse Studies 111: 353–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles. N., and Sandra A. Thompson
1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Liao, Silvie
2009 “Variation in the Use of Discourse Markers by Chinese Teaching Assistants in the US.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1313–1328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Binmei
2009 Discourse Marker Use by L1 Chinese EFL Speakers. The University of Florida Ph.D. Thesis.Google Scholar
Miracle, W. Charles
1991 Discourse Markers in Mandarin Chinese. The Ohio State University Ph.D. Thesis.Google Scholar
Moreno, Ángela Eugenia Iglesias
2001 “Native-Speaker – Non-Native Speaker Interaction: The Use of Discourse Markers.” ELLA 21: 129–142.Google Scholar
Müller, Simore
2004 “ ‘Well you Know that Type of Person’: Functions of Well in the Speech of American and German Students.” Journal of Pragmatics 361: 1157–1182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native English Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.
2001 “Discourse Markers in Oral Narrative.” Journal of pragmatics 331: 49–878. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ostman, Jan Ola
1982 “The Symbiotic Relationship between Pragmatic Particles and Impromptu Speech.” In Impromptu Speech: A Symposium, ed. by Nils Enkvist, 147–177. Abo, Finland: Abo Akademi.Google Scholar
Redeker, Gisela
1991 “Linguistic Markers of Discourse Structure.” Linguistics 291: 1139–1172.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence
1999 “Tutorial Overview: Discourse Markers.” Lingua 1071: 227–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita
1994 An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Tsai, Pei-Shu, and Wo-Hsin Chu
2015 “The Use of Discourse Markers among Mandarin Chinese Teachers, and Chinese as a Second Language and Chinese as a Foreign Language Learners.” Applied Linguistics: amv057. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wei, Ming
2011a “Investigating the Oral Proficiency of English Learners in China: A Comparative Study of the Use of Pragmatic Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3455–3472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b “A Comparative Study of the Oral Proficiency of Chinese Learners of English across Task Functions: A Discourse Marker Perspective.” Foreign Language Annals 441: 674–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshimi, Dina Rudolph
2001 “Explicit Instruction and JFL Learners’ Use of Interactional Discourse Markers.” In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. by Kenneth R. Rose, and Gabriele Kasper, 223–244. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Algouzi, Sami & Krisda Chaemsaithong
2021. Functions of the discourse markerSoin the LINDSEI-AR corpus. Cogent Arts & Humanities 8:1 DOI logo
Collet, Caroline, Stefan Diemer & Marie‐Louise Brunner
2021. Soin video‐mediated communication in the Expanding Circle. World Englishes 40:4 ► pp. 594 ff. DOI logo
Sato, Shie
2019. A corpus-based analysis of so in written discourse: A comparison between L1 English speakers and Japanese EFL learners. Applied Pragmatics 1:1 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Aoran & Qinxue Li
2023. Effect of task type on the use of discourse markers in L2 Portuguese by L1 Chinese learners. Diacrítica 36:2 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.