Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 3:2 (1993) ► pp.171–180

Intentionality and meaning

A reaction to Leilich’s “intentionality, speech acts and communicative action”

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 1993
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.3.2.04mul
References
Alston, W
(1991) Searle on illocutionary acts. In E. Lepore and R. Van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and his critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 57-80.Google Scholar
Apel, K.O
(1991) Is intentionality more basic than linguistic meaning? In E. Lepore and R. Van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and his critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 31-55.Google Scholar
Bach, K. and R. Harnish
(1979) Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1992) How performatives really work: a reply to Searle. Linguistics and philosophy 151: 93-110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bange, P
(1992) Analyse conversationnelle et théorie de l’action. Paris: Hatier/Didier.Google Scholar
Bouveresse, J
(1971) La parole malheureuse. De l’alchimie linguistique à la grammaire philosophique. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Grice, P
(1957) Meaning. Philosophical review 661: 377-388. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1968) Utterer’s meaning, sentence-meaning and word-meaning. Foundations of language 41: 1-18.Google Scholar
Gripp, H
(1984) Jürgen Habermas. Und es gibt sie doch - Zur kommunikationstheoretischen Begründung von Vernunft bei Jürgen Habermas. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J
(1976) Was heisst Universalpragmatik? In K.O. Apel (ed.), Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 174-272.Google Scholar
(1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Fourth, revised edition, 1988.Google Scholar
(1982) A reply to my critics. Universal pragmatics. In J. Thompson and D. Held (eds.), Habermas. Critical debates. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 269-274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Comments on John Searle: “Meaning, communication and representation”. In E. Lepore and R. Van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and his critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 17-29.Google Scholar
Leilich, J
(1993) Intentionality, speech acts and communicative action. Manuscript.  BoP
Lepore, E. and Van Gulick, R
(1991) John Searle and his critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Récanati, F
(1981) Les énoncés performatifs. Contribution à la pragmatique. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Searle, J
(1969) Speech Acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Second reprint, 1970. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1979) Literal meaning. In J. Searle (ed.), Expression and meaning. Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Third reprint, 1985. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1983) Intentionality. An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Third reprint, 1985. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1986) Meaning, communication and representation. In R. Grandy and R. Warner (eds.), Philosophical grounds of rationality. Intentions, categories, ends. Oxford: Clarendon, 209-226.Google Scholar
(1989a) Individual intentionality and social phenomena in the theory of speech acts. In Deledalle, J. (ed.), Semiotics and pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3-17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989b) How performatives work. Linguistics and philosophy 121: 535-558. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1990) Collective Intentions and actions. In P. Cohhen, J. Morgan and M. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in communication. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 401-415.Google Scholar
(1991) Response: meaning, intentionality and speech acts. In E. Lepore and R. Van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and his critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 81-102.Google Scholar
Thompson, J
(1982) Universal pragmatics. In J. Thompson and D. Held (eds.), Habermas. Critical debates. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 116-133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weyns, W
(1990) De sociologie van Jürgen Habermas. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Mesa, Joaquín
1995. Arte de hablar y pragmática. Historiographia Linguistica 22:1-2 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Uwajeh, M.K.C.
2022. Is ‘may i ask you a question?’ a question?. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Verschueren, Jef
1995. The Pragmatic Return to Meaning: Notes on the Dynamics of Communication, Degrees of Salience, and Communicative Transparency. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 5:2 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.