Article published In:
Vol. 4:1 (1994) ► pp.81107
Atkinson, J.M.
(1984) Our masters’ voices: The language and body language of politics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J.M., and J. Heritage
(eds.) (1984) Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, J.R.
(1982) Schweigephasen im Gespräch – Aspekte ihrer interaktiven Organisation. In H.-G. Soeffner (ed.), Beiträge zu einer empirischen Sprachsoziologie. Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 143-184.Google Scholar
Brinker, K., and S.F. Sager
(1989) Linguistische Gesprächsanalyse. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Bublitz, W.
(1988) Supportive fellow-speakers and cooperative conversations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishers. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Button, G., and J.R.E. Lee
(eds.) (1987) Talk and social organisation. Clevedon, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.
(1993) Prosodie and functional units of language. In J.A. Edwards & M.D. Lampert (eds.). Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 33-43.Google Scholar
Cosnier, J., and C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni
(1987) Décrire la conversation. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.Google Scholar
Coulthard, M., and M. Montgomery
(eds.) (1981) Studies in discourse analysis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(1990) Discovering rhythm in conversational English: Perceptual and acoustic approaches to the analysis of isochrony (Arbeitspapier Nr. 13). Konstanz, Germany: Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Coupland, N., H. Giles, and J.M. Wiemann
(eds.) (1981) “Miscommunication” and problematic talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A.
(1986) Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J.
(1978) An instance of negotiating in a call closing. Sociology 121: 123-133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J.W.
Du Bois, J.W., S. Schuetze-Coburn, S. Cumming, and D. Paolino
(1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In J.A. Edwards & M.D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 45-89.Google Scholar
Edwards, J.A.
(1989) Transcription and the new functionalism: A counterproposal to CHILDES’ CHAT conventions (Berkeley Cognitive Science Report No. 58). Berkeley, CA: Institute of Cognitive Studies, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ehlich, K.
(1993) HIAT – A transcription system for discourse data. In J.A. Edwards & M.D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 123-148.Google Scholar
Ehlich, K., and J. Rehbein
(1976) Halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen (HIAT). Linguistische Berichte 451: 21-41.Google Scholar
(1979) Erweiterte halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen (HIAT 2): Intonation. Linguistische Berichte 591: 51-75.Google Scholar
(1981) Zur Notierung nonverbaler Kommunikation für diskursanalytische Zwecke (Erweiterte halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen [HIAT 2]). In P. Winkler (ed.), Methoden der Analyse von Face-to-Face Situationen. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 302-329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
French, P., and J. Local
(1983) Turn-competitive incomings. Journal of Pragmatics 71: 17-38. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fritz, G.
(1982) Kohärenz, Grundfragen der linguistischen Kommunikationsanalyse. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hafez, O.M.
(1991) Turn-taking in Egyptian Arabic: Spontaneous vs. drama dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 151: 59-81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helm, D.T., W.T. Anderson, A.J. Meehan, and A.W. Rawls
(eds.) (1989) The interactional order: New directions in the study of social order. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Henne, H., and H. Rehbock
(1982) Einßhrung in die Gesprächsanalyse. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, R., S. Koch, and J. Mandelbaum
(1986) Conversational analysis methods. In D.G. Ellis & W.A. Donohue (eds.), Contemporary issues in language and discourse processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 169-186.Google Scholar
Houtkoop, H., and H. Mazeland
(1985) Turns and discourse units in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 91: 613-615. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(9184a) Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “yeah” and “mm hm”. Papers in Linguistics 171: 197-216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1984b) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 346-369.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1989) Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger & P. Bull (eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters, 166-196.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., H. Sacks, and E.A. Schegloff
(1984) On laughter in pursuit of intimacy. (Working Papers and pre-publications No. 135, Series C). Urbino, Italy: Centro Internazionale di Semiotica e di Linguistica, Université di Urbino.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jucker, A.H.
(1986) News interviews: A pragmalinguistic analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenz, F.
(1989) Organisationsprinzipien in mündlicher Fachkommunikation. Zur Gesprächsorganisation von “Technical Meetings”. Frankfurt/M: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C.
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, P.
(1982) The written language bias in linguistics. Linköping, Sweden: University of Linköping.  BoPGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(1991) The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maynard, S.K.
(1989) Japanese conversation. Self-contextualization through structure and interactional management. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
McHoul, A.
(1978) The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society 71: 183-213. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Nofsinger, R.E.
(1991) Everyday conversation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ochs, E.
(1979) Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B.B. Schieffelin (eds.), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 43-72.  BoPGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, D.C.
(1991) The spoken flies away; the written stays put. Georgetown Journal of Languages & Linguistics 21: 274-283.Google Scholar
O’Connell, D.C, and S. Kowal
(1990) Some sources of error in the transcription of real time in spoken discourse. Georgetown Journal of Languages & Linguisticss 11: 453-466.Google Scholar
Ong, W.J.
(1982) Orality and literacy. London: Methuen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozaki, A.
(1989) Requests for clarification in conversation between Japanese and Non-Japanese (Pacific Linguistics, Series B-102). Canberra, Australia: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Posner, R.
(1985) Nonverbale Zeichen in öffentlicher Kommunikation. Zeitschrift fürSemiotik 71:235-271.Google Scholar
Potter, J., and M. Wetherell
(1987) Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Psathas, G.
(1979) Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Psathas, G., and T. Anderson
(1990) The ‘practices’ of transcription in conversation analysis. Semiotica 781: 75-99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 501: 696-735. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Scanneil, P.
(ed.) (1991) Broadcast talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A. and H. Sacks
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 71: 289-327. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schenkein, J.
(ed.) (1978) Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Streeck, S.
(1989) Die Fokussierung in Kurzzeittherapie. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, G., and R.M. Seiler
(eds.) (1992) Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Webster’s ninth new collegiate dictionary
(1983) Springfield, MA: G & C Merriam.Google Scholar
West, C, and D.H. Zimmermann
(1982) Conversation analysis. In K.R. Scherer & P. Ekman (eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal research. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 506-541.Google Scholar
Wowk, M.T.
(1989) Emotion talk. In B. Torode (ed.), Text and talk as social practice. Discourse difference and division in speech and writing. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications, 51-71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, D.H., and C. West
(1975) Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thome & N. Henley (eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 105-129.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 19 other publications

Ashmore, Malcolm, Katie MacMillan & Steven D. Brown
2004. It's a scream: professional hearing and tape fetishism. Journal of Pragmatics 36:2  pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Bendazzoli, Claudio, Michela Bertozzi & Mariachiara Russo
2020. Du texte aux ressources multimodales : faire avancer la recherche en interprétation à partir d’un corpus déjà existant†. Meta 65:1  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Bolívar, Adriana
1997. Luis Cortés Rodríguez (ed.), El español coloqutal: Actas del I Simposto sobre Análisis del Discurso Oral. Almería, Spain: Universidad de Almería, 1995. Pp. 223. Language in Society 26:3  pp. 450 ff. DOI logo
Contento, Silvana & Stefania Stame
1997. Scripts and Transcriptions in Dialogue Analysis. In Dialogue Analysis: Units, relations and strategies beyond the sentence,  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Davidson, Christina
2009. Transcription: Imperatives for Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8:2  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Davidson, Christina
2010. transcription matters. Journal of Early Childhood Research 8:2  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Dobson, Stephen
2018. A Method to Theorise and Investigate the Social Practice of the Viva. In Assessing the Viva in Higher Education [The Enabling Power of Assessment, 6],  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Duncker, Dorthe
2011. On the empirical challenge to integrational studies in language. Language Sciences 33:4  pp. 533 ff. DOI logo
Fauré, Laurent
2002. Transcrire les données vocales : en quoi les corrélats prosodiques des interjections sont-ils notables ?. Cahiers de praxématique :39  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina & Tony McEnery
2022. The Trinity Lancaster Corpus. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research  pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Lamanna, J., S. Trapp, C. Russell & M. Stern
2015. Preparing for the future: An examination of healthcare provider and patient communication regarding childhood cancer survivorship. Child: Care, Health and Development 41:6  pp. 1047 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2000. Les effets théoriques des pratiques de transcription. Linx :42  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2002. Pratiques de transcription et effets de catégorisation. Cahiers de praxématique :39  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Monti, Cristina, Claudio Bendazzoli, Annalisa Sandrelli & Mariachiara Russo1
2009. Studying Directionality in Simultaneous Interpreting through an Electronic Corpus: EPIC (European Parliament Interpreting Corpus). Meta 50:4 DOI logo
O’Connell, Daniel C. & Sabine Kowal
1995. Transcription systems for spoken discourse. In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 646 ff. DOI logo
O’Connell, Daniel C. & Sabine Kowal
2022. Transcription systems for spoken discourse. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 1839 ff. DOI logo
Schmidt, Thomas
2016. Good practices in the compilation of FOLK, the Research and Teaching Corpus of Spoken German. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:3  pp. 396 ff. DOI logo
Song, Juyoung
2014. Transcribing Interactions. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Traverso, Véronique
2002. Transcription et traduction des interactions en langue étrangère. Cahiers de praxématique :39  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.