Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 5:3 (1995) ► pp.341–364

The inferential construction

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 September 1995
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.5.3.03del
References
Austen, J
(1963) [1813] Pride and prejudice. London: Dent.Google Scholar
(1980) [1818] Persuasion. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Bradley, M.Z
(1982) The mists of’Avalen. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Collins, P.C
(1991) Cleft and pseudo-cleft constructions in English. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Declerck, R
(1988) Studies on copular sentences, clefts and pseudo-clefts. Louvain: Leuven University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) The inferential it is that-construction and its congeners. Lingua 871: 203-230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delahunty, G.P
(1982) Topics in the syntax and semantics of English cleft sentences. Bloomington: IULC.Google Scholar
Eco, U
(1988) Ilpendolo di Foucault. Milano: Bompiani.Google Scholar
(1989) Foucauld’s pendulum. Translated by W. Weaver. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Frame, R
(1981) Colonial Ireland 1169–1369. Dublin: Helicon.Google Scholar
Garrett, G
(1983) The succession. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gogarty, O.St.J
(1968) As I was going down Sach’ille Street. London: Sphere.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Horn, L.R
(1989) The natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Irving, J
(1978) The 158-pound marriage. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
Kies, D
(1988) Marked themes with and without pronominal reinforcement: Their meaning and distribution in discourse. In E. Steiner and R. Veltman (eds.), Pragmatics, discourse and text. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Kuno, S
(1973) The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mallory, J.P
(1989) In search of the Indo-Europeans. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Murdoch, I
(1975) The black prince. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Powell, T.G.E
(1983) The Celts. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, J. Svartvik
(1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Richter, M
(1988) Medieval Ireland. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E
(1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1041: 192-233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, S.H
(1989) The changing climate. Scientific American (Sept.). DOI logo
Somerville, E. and M. Ross
(1977) The real Charlotte. London: Quartet.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson
(1986) Relevance: communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wilder, T
(1987) The ides of March. New York: Harper and Rowe.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Bearth, Thomas
2022. The inferential gap condition. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Calude, Andreea S. & Gerald P. Delahunty
2022. Inferentials in spoken English. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Cruschina, Silvio
2018. Setting the boundaries. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
DELAHUNTY, GERALD P.
2001. Discourse functions of inferential sentences. Linguistics 39:3 DOI logo
Delahunty, Gerald P.
2022. An analysis of The thing is that S sentences. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Delahunty, Gerald P. & Laura Gatzkiewicz
2022. On the Spanish inferential construction ser que . Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Delorme, Benjamin
2021. Quelle « synonymie » pour les pseudo-clivées en what, all + that et all + Ø ?. Syntaxe et Sémantique N° 21:1 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2014. Processibility. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
LAMBRECHT, KNUD
2001. A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39:3 DOI logo
Lopes, Ana Cristina Macário
2012. Contributos para uma análise semântico-pragmática das causais de enunciação no Português Europeu contemporâneo. Alfa : Revista de Linguística (São José do Rio Preto) 56:2 ► pp. 451 ff. DOI logo
Myung-Kwan Park & Li Zhen-Xuan
2014. Copula and ‘Sluicing' Constructions in Korean, Chinese, and Japanese. Korean Journal of Linguistics 39:3 ► pp. 427 ff. DOI logo
Remberger, Eva-Maria
2020. Chapter 2. Information-structural properties of is that clauses. In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213], ► pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Vydrina, Alexandra
2020. Topicality in Sentence Focus utterances. Studies in Language 44:3 ► pp. 501 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Bibliography. In Discourse Readjustment(s) in Contemporary English, ► pp. 335 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.