Article published In:
Interaction-based studies of languageEdited by Cecilia E. Ford and Johannes Wagner
[Pragmatics 6:3] 1996
► pp. 427–454
Edited by Cecilia E. Ford and Johannes Wagner
[Pragmatics 6:3] 1996
► pp. 427–454
Practices in the construction of turns
The “TCU” revisited
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Auer, Peter
(1992) The neverending sentence: Rightward expansion in spoken German. In M. Kontra & T. Varadi (eds.), Studies in spoken languages: English, German, Finno-Ugric. Budapest: Linguistics Institute/Hungarian Academy of Sciences, pp. 41-59.
(1996) On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Bolinger, Dwight
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
(1987) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chafe, Wallace
(1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and pounding in discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 21-51.
(1988) Linking intonation units in spoken English. In J. Haiman & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-27.
(1992) Intonation units and prominences in English natural discourse. Proceedings of the IRCS Workshop on Prosody in Natural Speech, pp. 41-52. Institute for Research in Cognitive Science Report No. 92–37. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
(1993) Prosodie and functional units of language. In J.A Edwards & M.D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 33-43.
199) Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
(1993) English speech rhythm: Form and function in everyday verbal interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
BoP
(1992) Contextualizing discourse: The prosody of interactive repair. In P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Cruttenden, Alan
Crystal, David
(1969) Prosodie systems and intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davidson, J
(1984) Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, pp. 102-28. BoP
Du Bois, John, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Danae Paolino & Susanna Cumming
(1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In J.A Edwards & M.D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 45-89.
Ford, Cecilia E
(1993 Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPFord, Cecilia E. & Junko Mori
(1994) Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: A cross-linguistic study of interactional grammar. Pragmatics 4.1: 31-62. BoP
Ford, Cecilia E. & Sandra A. Thompson
(1996) Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the projection of turn completion. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPFox, Barbara A, Robert Jasperson & Makoto Hayashi
(1996) Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repair. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Charles
(1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.
(1980) Restarts, pauses and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn beginning. Sociological Inquiry 501: 272-302. BoP
BoP
(1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press BoP
(1986b) Between and within: Alternative treatmens of continuers and assessments. Human Studies 91: 205-17.
(1986c) Gesture as a rexource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica 62.1/2: 29-49.
(1989) Turn construction and conversational organization. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B.J. OKeefe & E. Wartella, (eds.), Rethinking communication, Vol. 2, Paradigm exemplars. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, pp. 88-102.
(1995) Sentence construction within interaction. In U.M. Quasthoff (ed.), Aspects of oral communication. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 198-219.
(1996) Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie H. Goodwin
(1986) Gesture and (»participation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica 62.1/2: 51-75.
(1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1.1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-54.
Hayashi, Makoto, Junko Mori & Tomoyo Takagi
(1995) Emergent nature of tums-at-talk: Preliminary observations of turn construction in Japanese conversation. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico, July.
Jefferson, Gail
(1973) A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica: 91 47-96. BoP
BoP
(1974) Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society 31: 181-99
(1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, pp. 79-96.
(1983) Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In V. dUrso and P. Leonardi (eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric. Padua: Cleup, pp. 11-38.
(1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346-369.
(1986) Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human Studies 91: 153-183.
Lerner, Gene
(1996) On the ‘semi-permeable’ character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another participant. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lerner, Gene & Tomoyo Takagi
In press) On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics.
Local, John
(1992) Continuing and restarting. In P. Auer & A De Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Local, John & J. Kelly
(1986) Projection and ‘silences’: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies 91: 185-204.
Ochs, Elinor
(1979) Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs and B.B. Schieffelin (eds.), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 221-301. BoP
Örestrom, Bengt
(1983) Turn taking in English conversation. Lund Studies in English 66. Lund: CWL Gleerup.
Pomerantz, Anita
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action, pp. 57-101.
Sacks, Harvey
(1992a) Lectures on conversation. Volume 1. Oxford: Blackwell.
(1992b) Lectures on conversation. Volume 2. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50.4: 696-735. BoP
BoPSchegloff, Emanuel
(1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 261-88.
(1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: Can I ask you a question? Sociological Inquiry 501: 104-152.
(1988) Discourse as an interactional achievement II: An exercise in conversation analysis. In D. Tannen (ed.), Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding. (Advances in Discourse Processes XXIX.) Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 135-158.
(1989) Body torque. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Meeting, November. New Orleans.
(1995) Reflections on Studying Intonation in Talk-in-Interaction. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics Meeting, March, Long Beach.
(1996) Turn organization as a direction for inquiry into grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPSchegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization fo repair in conversation. Language 531: 361-82. BoP
BoPSchuetze-Coburn, Stephan
(1992) Prosodie phrase as a prototype. Proceedings of the IRCS workshop on prosody in natural speech. University of Pennsylvania, August, 1992. (Institute for Cognitive Research Report), pp. 92-37.
To appear) Prosody, grammar, and discourse pragmatics: Organizational principles of information flow in German conversational narratives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Marian Shapley & Elizabeth G. Weber
(1991) Units of intonation in discourse: A comparison of acoustic and auditory analyses Language and Speech 341: 207-234.
Streeck, Jürgen & Ulrike Hartge
(1992) Gestures at the transition place. In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (eds.), The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 135-157.
Tao, Hongyin
(1996) Prosodie, grammatical, and discourse functional units in Mandarin conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Cited by
Cited by 118 other publications
A. Fox, Barbara
2007. Principles shaping grammatical practices: an exploration. Discourse Studies 9:3 ► pp. 299 ff. 
Antonopoulou, Eleni & Kiki Nikiforidou
2011. Construction grammar and conventional discourse: A construction-based approach to discoursal incongruity. Journal of Pragmatics 43:10 ► pp. 2594 ff.
Argaman, Einav
2023. Neither speaker nor recipient: The middle-distance look of unaddressed participants. Discourse Studies ► pp. 146144562311570 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2022. An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 119 ff.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, Uwe-A. Küttner & Chase Wesley Raymond
2021. Pivots revisited: Cesuring in action. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 613 ff.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Richard Ogden
2021. “Chunking” spoken language: Introducing weak cesuras. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 531 ff.
Barthel, Mathias, Antje S. Meyer & Stephen C. Levinson
2017. Next Speakers Plan Their Turn Early and Speak after Turn-Final “Go-Signals”. Frontiers in Psychology 8
Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson & Jane Maxim
2009. Prosody as a compensatory strategy in the conversations of people with agrammatism. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 23:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Belhiah, H.
2012. You Know Arnold Schwarzenegger? On Doing Questioning in Second Language Dyadic Tutorials. Applied Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
Bonu, Bruno
2002. Présentation. Cahiers de praxématique :39 ► pp. 7 ff.
Bonu, Bruno
2002. L’opinion de l’autre : perturbations interactionnelles dans les échanges interculturels médiatisés. Cahiers de praxématique :38 ► pp. 221 ff.
Bonu, Bruno
2002. Transcription et analyse : les Unités Évaluatives de Construction de Tour. Cahiers de praxématique :39 ► pp. 135 ff.
Broth, Mathias & Lorenza Mondada
2013. Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 47:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Buchstaller, Isabelle
2006. Social stereotypes, personality traits and regional perception displaced: Attitudes towards the 'new' quotatives in the U.K.1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10:3 ► pp. 362 ff.
Caspers, Johanneke
2003. Local speech melody as a limiting factor in the turn-taking system in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 31:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
Chen, Yiya & Agnes Weiyun He
2001. Dui bu dui as a pragmatic marker: evidence from chinese classrom discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 33:9 ► pp. 1441 ff.
Constantin de Chanay, Hugues & Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni
2010. Les interruptions dans les débats médiatiques : une stratégie interactionnelle. Pratiques :147-148 ► pp. 83 ff.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
Deppermann, Arnulf, Lorenza Mondada & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2021. Early Responses: An Introduction. Discourse Processes 58:4 ► pp. 293 ff.
Fernandez, Raquel, Tatjana Lucht, Kepa Rodriguez & David Schlangen
2006. 2006 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop, ► pp. 206 ff.
Ferrara, Lindsay
FISCHER, KERSTIN
2015. Conversation, Construction Grammar, and cognition. Language and Cognition 7:4 ► pp. 563 ff.
Fischer, Kerstin, Kilian Foth, Katharina Rohlfing & Britta Wrede
2011. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL), ► pp. 1 ff.
Ford, Cecilia E.
1999. Collaborative Construction of Task Activity: Coordinating Multiple Resources in a High School Physics Lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32:4 ► pp. 369 ff.
Ford, Cecilia E.
2004. Contingency and Units in Interaction. Discourse Studies 6:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Ford, Cecilia E.
2012. Conversation Analysis and Turn Taking. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Fox, Barbara
1999. Directions in Research: Language and the Body. Research on Language & Social Interaction 32:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Girard-Groeber, Simone
2015. The management of turn transition in signed interaction through the lens of overlaps. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Gras, Pedro & María Sol Sansiñena
2020. Un caso de variación pragmático-discursiva:queinicial en tres variedades dialectales del español. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 71:1 ► pp. 271 ff.
Gras, Pedro & María Sol Sansiñena
2015. An interactional account of discourse-connective que-constructions in Spanish. Text & Talk 35:4
Guillot, Marie-Noëlle
2022. Revisiting the methodological debate on interruptions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 25 ff.
Guthrie, Anna M.
2022. On the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academic advising sessions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 397 ff.
Hayashi, Makoto
2003. Language and the Body as Resources for Collaborative Action: A Study of Word Searches in Japanese Conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 36:2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Hayashi, Makoto
2004. Projection and grammar: notes on the ‘action-projecting’ use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 36:8 ► pp. 1337 ff.
HAYASHI, MAKOTO
2004. Discourse within a sentence: An exploration of postpositions in Japanese as an interactional resource. Language in Society 33:03
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa, Tomoko Endo & Elise Kärkkäinen
2018. Units in responsive turns. Journal of Pragmatics 123 ► pp. 117 ff.
Hellermann, John
2005. Syntactic and Prosodic Practices for Cohesion in Series of Three-Part Sequences in Classroom Talk. Research on Language & Social Interaction 38:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Hellermann, John & Yo-An Lee
2014. Members and their competencies: Contributions of ethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second language acquisition. System 44 ► pp. 54 ff.
Holler, Judith, Phillip M. Alday, Caitlin Decuyper, Mareike Geiger, Kobin H. Kendrick & Antje S. Meyer
2021. Competition Reduces Response Times in Multiparty Conversation. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Holler, Judith & Kobin H. Kendrick
2015. Unaddressed participants’ gaze in multi-person interaction: optimizing recipiency. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2015. ‘Pivotage’ in French talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 593 ff.
Hömke, Paul, Judith Holler & Stephen C. Levinson
2017. Eye Blinking as Addressee Feedback in Face-To-Face Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50:1 ► pp. 54 ff.
Ivarsson, Jonas & Christian Greiffenhagen
2015. The Organization of Turn-Taking in Pool Skate Sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:4 ► pp. 406 ff.
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Preeya Ingkaphirom Horie
1998. The `Northridge Earthquake' Conversations: Conversational Patterns in Japanese and Thai and their Cultural Significance. Discourse & Society 9:4 ► pp. 501 ff.
Jacoby, Sally
1999. Turn. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9:1-2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Kamunen, Antti
2018. Open Hand Prone as a resource in multimodal claims to interruption. Gesture 17:2 ► pp. 291 ff.
Karlsson, Susanna
2020. The Meanings of List Constructions: Explicating Interactional Polysemy. In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication, ► pp. 223 ff.
Keevallik, Leelo
2014. Turn organization and bodily-vocal demonstrations. Journal of Pragmatics 65 ► pp. 103 ff.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2004. Introducing polylogue. Journal of Pragmatics 36:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kern, Friederike & Margret Selting
2012. Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Kern, Friederike & Margret Selting
2020. Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Kikuchi, Kouhei
2008. Turn-taking Mechanism in Japanese Sign Language Conversation. Japanese Journal of Sign Language Studies 17:0 ► pp. 29 ff.
Kim, Kyu-hyun
1999. Phrasal Unit Boundaries and Organization of Turns and Sequences in Korean Conversation. Human Studies 22:2-4 ► pp. 425 ff.
Kim, Kyu-hyun
2022. Sequential organization of post-predicate elements in Korean conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 573 ff.
Lerner, Gene H. & Tomoyo Takagi
1999. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics 31:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Li, Xiaoting
2016. Some interactional uses of syntactically incomplete turns in Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:2 ► pp. 237 ff.
Li, Xiaoting
2021. Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 549 ff.
Lilja, Niina & Arja Piirainen-Marsh
2019. How Hand Gestures Contribute to Action Ascription. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:4 ► pp. 343 ff.
Luke, K.K. & Mei Fang
2021. Special issue on joint production of conversational turns. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Luke, Kang-kwong & Wei Zhang
2022. Retrospective turn continuations in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 605 ff.
Markee, N.
2007. Toward a Learning Behavior Tracking Methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics 29:3 ► pp. 404 ff.
Matsumoto, Kazuko
2003. Unit linking in conversational Japanese. Language Sciences 25:5 ► pp. 433 ff.
Mira, Caio
2016. CONVERSAÇÃO NAS AFASIAS: UMA ANÁLISE DO TÓPICO DISCURSIVO E DO TURNO CONVERSACIONAL SOB A PERSPECTIVA TEXTUAL-INTERATIVA. Linguagem em (Dis)curso 16:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza
2007. Multimodal resources for turn-taking. Discourse Studies 9:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza
2014. The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 65 ► pp. 137 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza
2015. Multimodal completions. In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27], ► pp. 267 ff.
Mori, Junko
2014. The re-examination of so-called ‘clefts’: A study of multiunit turns in Japanese
talk-in-interaction. In Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 156], ► pp. 193 ff.
Morof, Julia
2018. Patterns of construction in spoken French. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:1 ► pp. 159 ff.
Mushin, Ilana & Simona Pekarek Doehler
Nakamura, Kanae
2018. Chapter 4. “Late projectability” of Japanese turns revisited. In Pragmatics of Japanese [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 285], ► pp. 99 ff.
Nikiforidou, Kiki
Park, Innhwa & Jacob Kline
2020. Incomplete utterances as critical assessments. Discourse Studies 22:4 ► pp. 441 ff.
Park, Jae-Eun
2016. Turn-taking in Korean conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 99 ► pp. 62 ff.
Pauletto, Franco
2020. L’analisi della conversazione per valutare l’autenticità dei materiali audio per l’insegnamento dell’italiano L2: una proposta metodologica. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 7:2 ► pp. 28 ff.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
2011. Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: the on-line formatting of left and right dislocations in French conversation. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ► pp. 45 ff.
Persson, Rasmus
2017. Fill-in-the-Blank Questions in Interaction: Incomplete Utterances as a Resource for Doing Inquiries. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50:3 ► pp. 227 ff.
Persson, Rasmus
2017. La prosodie comme ressource pour l’organisation de l’interaction : état des lieux et illustrations. Revue française de linguistique appliquée Vol. XXII:2 ► pp. 33 ff.
Piotrowski, Michał
2014. Prosody in Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 61 ► pp. 1 ff.
Pulles, Maaike, Jan Berenst, Kees de Glopper & Tom Koole
2020. Text selection proposals in dialogic reading in primary school. Pragmatics and Society 11:4 ► pp. 591 ff.
Riou, Marine
2015. A Methodology for the Identification of Topic Transitions in Interaction. Discours :16
Riou, Marine
2017. Transitioning to a new topic in American English conversation: A multi-level and mixed-methods account. Journal of Pragmatics 117 ► pp. 88 ff.
Roulet, Eddy
2001. A la frontière de l'ordre de la langue et de l'ord re du discours: a clause et l'acte. In Sprachkontakt, Sprachvergleich, Sprachvariation, ► pp. 297 ff.
Sidnell, Jack
2007. Comparative Studies in Conversation Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 36:1 ► pp. 229 ff.
Skidmore, David & Kyoko Murakami
2010. How prosody marks shifts in footing in classroom discourse. International Journal of Educational Research 49:2-3 ► pp. 69 ff.
Song, Zixuan & Stefana Vukadinovich
2021. Collaborative construction of turn constructional units in responsive positions of question-answer sequences in
Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 12:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
Sparrow, Karen, Christopher Lind & Willem van Steenbrugge
2020. Gesture, communication, and adult acquired hearing loss. Journal of Communication Disorders 87 ► pp. 106030 ff.
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
Taboada, Maite
2022. Spontaneous and non-spontaneous turn-taking. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 329 ff.
Tanaka, Hiroko
2000. Turn Projection in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Turk, Monica J.
2004. Using and in Conversational Interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction 37:2 ► pp. 219 ff.
van Kruiningen, Jacqueline F.
2013. Educational design as conversation: A conversation analytical perspective on teacher dialogue. Teaching and Teacher Education 29 ► pp. 110 ff.
Vatanen, Anna
2018. Responding in Early Overlap: Recognitional Onsets in Assertion Sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:2 ► pp. 107 ff.
Vatanen, Anna, Tomoko Endo & Daisuke Yokomori
2021. Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Projection in Overlapping Agreements to Assertions: Stance-Taking as a Resource for Projection. Discourse Processes 58:4 ► pp. 308 ff.
Vranjes, Jelena & Geert Brône
2020. Chapter 8. Eye-tracking in interpreter-mediated talk. In Linking up with Video [Benjamins Translation Library, 149], ► pp. 203 ff.
Vranjes, Jelena, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts
2018. On the role of gaze in the organization of turn-taking and sequence organization in interpreter-mediated dialogue. Language and Dialogue 8:3 ► pp. 439 ff.
Walker, Gareth
2007. On the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 39:12 ► pp. 2217 ff.
Ward, Nigel & Wataru Tsukahara
2000. Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 32:8 ► pp. 1177 ff.
Weatherall, Ann
2011. I don't knowas a Prepositioned Epistemic Hedge. Research on Language & Social Interaction 44:4 ► pp. 317 ff.
Young, Richard F. & Elizabeth R. Miller
2004. Learning as Changing Participation: Discourse Roles in ESL Writing Conferences. The Modern Language Journal 88:4 ► pp. 519 ff.
Zawiszová, Halina
2018. On ´doing friendship´ in and through talk: Exploring conversational interactions of Japanese young people,
Zellers, Margaret
2017. Prosodic Variation and Segmental Reduction and Their Roles in Cuing Turn Transition in Swedish. Language and Speech 60:3 ► pp. 454 ff.
이진아
2013. L2 Learner’s Identities and Gender in ESL and EFL Classroom Interaction. English21 26:2 ► pp. 397 ff.
[no author supplied]
2009. Conversation Analysis by Ian Hutchby and Robin Wooffitt�An Introduction to Conversation Analysis by Anthony J. Liddicoat�Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:5 ► pp. 702 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. References. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ► pp. 741 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 3. Syntax in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 33 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 6. Interplay of syntax, prosody, body movements and pragmatic resources in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 195 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 7. Conclusion. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 241 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Glossing conventions. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. xi ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 5. Body movements in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 139 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 2. Preliminaries and methodology. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 23 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 4. Prosody in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 71 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Transcription conventions. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. ix ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. References. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 247 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.