Article published In:
Interaction-based studies of languageEdited by Cecilia E. Ford and Johannes Wagner
[Pragmatics 6:3] 1996
► pp. 427–454
Edited by Cecilia E. Ford and Johannes Wagner
[Pragmatics 6:3] 1996
► pp. 427–454
Practices in the construction of turns
The “TCU” revisited
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Auer, Peter
(1992) The neverending sentence: Rightward expansion in spoken German. In M. Kontra & T. Varadi (eds.), Studies in spoken languages: English, German, Finno-Ugric. Budapest: Linguistics Institute/Hungarian Academy of Sciences, pp. 41-59.
(1996) On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Bolinger, Dwight
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
(1987) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chafe, Wallace
(1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and pounding in discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 21-51.
(1988) Linking intonation units in spoken English. In J. Haiman & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-27.
(1992) Intonation units and prominences in English natural discourse. Proceedings of the IRCS Workshop on Prosody in Natural Speech, pp. 41-52. Institute for Research in Cognitive Science Report No. 92–37. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
(1993) Prosodie and functional units of language. In J.A Edwards & M.D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 33-43.
199) Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
(1993) English speech rhythm: Form and function in everyday verbal interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
BoP
(1992) Contextualizing discourse: The prosody of interactive repair. In P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Cruttenden, Alan
Crystal, David
(1969) Prosodie systems and intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davidson, J
(1984) Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, pp. 102-28. BoP
Du Bois, John, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Danae Paolino & Susanna Cumming
(1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In J.A Edwards & M.D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 45-89.
Ford, Cecilia E
(1993 Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPFord, Cecilia E. & Junko Mori
(1994) Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: A cross-linguistic study of interactional grammar. Pragmatics 4.1: 31-62. BoP
Ford, Cecilia E. & Sandra A. Thompson
(1996) Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the projection of turn completion. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPFox, Barbara A, Robert Jasperson & Makoto Hayashi
(1996) Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repair. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Charles
(1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.
(1980) Restarts, pauses and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn beginning. Sociological Inquiry 501: 272-302. BoP
BoP
(1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press BoP
(1986b) Between and within: Alternative treatmens of continuers and assessments. Human Studies 91: 205-17.
(1986c) Gesture as a rexource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica 62.1/2: 29-49.
(1989) Turn construction and conversational organization. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B.J. OKeefe & E. Wartella, (eds.), Rethinking communication, Vol. 2, Paradigm exemplars. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, pp. 88-102.
(1995) Sentence construction within interaction. In U.M. Quasthoff (ed.), Aspects of oral communication. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 198-219.
(1996) Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie H. Goodwin
(1986) Gesture and (»participation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica 62.1/2: 51-75.
(1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1.1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-54.
Hayashi, Makoto, Junko Mori & Tomoyo Takagi
(1995) Emergent nature of tums-at-talk: Preliminary observations of turn construction in Japanese conversation. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico, July.
Jefferson, Gail
(1973) A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica: 91 47-96. BoP
BoP
(1974) Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society 31: 181-99
(1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, pp. 79-96.
(1983) Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In V. dUrso and P. Leonardi (eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric. Padua: Cleup, pp. 11-38.
(1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346-369.
(1986) Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human Studies 91: 153-183.
Lerner, Gene
(1996) On the ‘semi-permeable’ character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another participant. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lerner, Gene & Tomoyo Takagi
In press) On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics.
Local, John
(1992) Continuing and restarting. In P. Auer & A De Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Local, John & J. Kelly
(1986) Projection and ‘silences’: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies 91: 185-204.
Ochs, Elinor
(1979) Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs and B.B. Schieffelin (eds.), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 221-301. BoP
Örestrom, Bengt
(1983) Turn taking in English conversation. Lund Studies in English 66. Lund: CWL Gleerup.
Pomerantz, Anita
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action, pp. 57-101.
Sacks, Harvey
(1992a) Lectures on conversation. Volume 1. Oxford: Blackwell.
(1992b) Lectures on conversation. Volume 2. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50.4: 696-735. BoP
BoPSchegloff, Emanuel
(1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 261-88.
(1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: Can I ask you a question? Sociological Inquiry 501: 104-152.
(1988) Discourse as an interactional achievement II: An exercise in conversation analysis. In D. Tannen (ed.), Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding. (Advances in Discourse Processes XXIX.) Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 135-158.
(1989) Body torque. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Meeting, November. New Orleans.
(1995) Reflections on Studying Intonation in Talk-in-Interaction. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics Meeting, March, Long Beach.
(1996) Turn organization as a direction for inquiry into grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPSchegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization fo repair in conversation. Language 531: 361-82. BoP
BoPSchuetze-Coburn, Stephan
(1992) Prosodie phrase as a prototype. Proceedings of the IRCS workshop on prosody in natural speech. University of Pennsylvania, August, 1992. (Institute for Cognitive Research Report), pp. 92-37.
To appear) Prosody, grammar, and discourse pragmatics: Organizational principles of information flow in German conversational narratives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Marian Shapley & Elizabeth G. Weber
(1991) Units of intonation in discourse: A comparison of acoustic and auditory analyses Language and Speech 341: 207-234.
Streeck, Jürgen & Ulrike Hartge
(1992) Gestures at the transition place. In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (eds.), The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 135-157.
Tao, Hongyin
(1996) Prosodie, grammatical, and discourse functional units in Mandarin conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Cited by
Cited by 121 other publications
A. Fox, Barbara
2007. Principles shaping grammatical practices: an exploration. Discourse Studies 9:3 ► pp. 299 ff. 
Antonopoulou, Eleni & Kiki Nikiforidou
2011. Construction grammar and conventional discourse: A construction-based approach to discoursal incongruity. Journal of Pragmatics 43:10 ► pp. 2594 ff.
Argaman, Einav
2023. Neither speaker nor recipient: The middle-distance look of unaddressed participants. Discourse Studies 25:5 ► pp. 573 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2022. An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 119 ff.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, Uwe-A. Küttner & Chase Wesley Raymond
2021. Pivots revisited: Cesuring in action. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 613 ff.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Richard Ogden
2021. “Chunking” spoken language: Introducing weak cesuras. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 531 ff.
Barthel, Mathias, Antje S. Meyer & Stephen C. Levinson
2017. Next Speakers Plan Their Turn Early and Speak after Turn-Final “Go-Signals”. Frontiers in Psychology 8
Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson & Jane Maxim
2009. Prosody as a compensatory strategy in the conversations of people with agrammatism. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 23:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Belhiah, H.
2012. You Know Arnold Schwarzenegger? On Doing Questioning in Second Language Dyadic Tutorials. Applied Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
Bonu, Bruno
2002. Présentation. Cahiers de praxématique :39 ► pp. 7 ff.
Bonu, Bruno
2002. L’opinion de l’autre : perturbations interactionnelles dans les échanges interculturels médiatisés. Cahiers de praxématique :38 ► pp. 221 ff.
Bonu, Bruno
2002. Transcription et analyse : les Unités Évaluatives de Construction de Tour. Cahiers de praxématique :39 ► pp. 135 ff.
Broth, Mathias & Lorenza Mondada
2013. Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 47:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Buchstaller, Isabelle
2006. Social stereotypes, personality traits and regional perception displaced: Attitudes towards the ‘new’ quotatives in the U.K.1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10:3 ► pp. 362 ff.
Caspers, Johanneke
2003. Local speech melody as a limiting factor in the turn-taking system in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 31:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
Chen, Yiya & Agnes Weiyun He
2001. Dui bu dui as a pragmatic marker: evidence from chinese classrom discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 33:9 ► pp. 1441 ff.
Constantin de Chanay, Hugues & Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni
2010. Les interruptions dans les débats médiatiques : une stratégie interactionnelle. Pratiques :147-148 ► pp. 83 ff.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
Deppermann, Arnulf, Lorenza Mondada & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2021. Early Responses: An Introduction. Discourse Processes 58:4 ► pp. 293 ff.
Fernandez, Raquel, Tatjana Lucht, Kepa Rodriguez & David Schlangen
2006. 2006 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop, ► pp. 206 ff.
Ferrara, Lindsay
FISCHER, KERSTIN
2015. Conversation, Construction Grammar, and cognition. Language and Cognition 7:4 ► pp. 563 ff.
Fischer, Kerstin, Kilian Foth, Katharina Rohlfing & Britta Wrede
2011. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL), ► pp. 1 ff.
Ford, Cecilia E.
1999. Collaborative Construction of Task Activity: Coordinating Multiple Resources in a High School Physics Lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32:4 ► pp. 369 ff.
Ford, Cecilia E.
2004. Contingency and Units in Interaction. Discourse Studies 6:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Ford, Cecilia E.
2012. Conversation Analysis and Turn Taking. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Fox, Barbara
1999. Directions in Research: Language and the Body. Research on Language & Social Interaction 32:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Girard-Groeber, Simone
2015. The management of turn transition in signed interaction through the lens of overlaps. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Gras, Pedro & María Sol Sansiñena
2020. Un caso de variación pragmático-discursiva:queinicial en tres variedades dialectales del español. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 71:1 ► pp. 271 ff.
Gras, Pedro & María Sol Sansiñena
2015. An interactional account of discourse-connective que-constructions in Spanish. Text & Talk 35:4
Guillot, Marie-Noëlle
2022. Revisiting the methodological debate on interruptions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 25 ff.
Guthrie, Anna M.
2022. On the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academic advising sessions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 397 ff.
Haddington, Pentti
2009. Conversation Analysis by Ian Hutchby and Robin Wooffitt
An Introduction to Conversation Analysis by Anthony J. Liddicoat
Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:5 ► pp. 702 ff.
Hayashi, Makoto
2003. Language and the Body as Resources for Collaborative Action: A Study of Word Searches in Japanese Conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 36:2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Hayashi, Makoto
2004. Projection and grammar: notes on the ‘action-projecting’ use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 36:8 ► pp. 1337 ff.
HAYASHI, MAKOTO
2004. Discourse within a sentence: An exploration of postpositions in Japanese as an interactional resource. Language in Society 33:03
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa, Tomoko Endo & Elise Kärkkäinen
2018. Units in responsive turns. Journal of Pragmatics 123 ► pp. 117 ff.
Hellermann, John
2005. Syntactic and Prosodic Practices for Cohesion in Series of Three-Part Sequences in Classroom Talk. Research on Language & Social Interaction 38:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Hellermann, John & Yo-An Lee
2014. Members and their competencies: Contributions of ethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second language acquisition. System 44 ► pp. 54 ff.
Holler, Judith, Phillip M. Alday, Caitlin Decuyper, Mareike Geiger, Kobin H. Kendrick & Antje S. Meyer
2021. Competition Reduces Response Times in Multiparty Conversation. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Holler, Judith & Kobin H. Kendrick
2015. Unaddressed participants’ gaze in multi-person interaction: optimizing recipiency. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2015. ‘Pivotage’ in French talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 593 ff.
Hulcelle, Marc, Giovanna Varni, Nicolas Rollet & Chloe Clavel
2023. International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, ► pp. 273 ff.
Hömke, Paul, Judith Holler & Stephen C. Levinson
2017. Eye Blinking as Addressee Feedback in Face-To-Face Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50:1 ► pp. 54 ff.
Ivarsson, Jonas & Christian Greiffenhagen
2015. The Organization of Turn-Taking in Pool Skate Sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:4 ► pp. 406 ff.
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Preeya Ingkaphirom Horie
1998. The `Northridge Earthquake' Conversations: Conversational Patterns in Japanese and Thai and their Cultural Significance. Discourse & Society 9:4 ► pp. 501 ff.
Jacoby, Sally
1999. Turn. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9:1-2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Jacquin, Jérôme
2011. Orientation interactionnelle et multimodale vers l’activité de « débattre ». Analyse d’un extrait de débat public. Mots :96 ► pp. 45 ff.
Kamunen, Antti
2018. Open Hand Prone as a resource in multimodal claims to interruption. Gesture 17:2 ► pp. 291 ff.
Karlsson, Susanna
2020. The Meanings of List Constructions: Explicating Interactional Polysemy. In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication, ► pp. 223 ff.
Keevallik, Leelo
2014. Turn organization and bodily-vocal demonstrations. Journal of Pragmatics 65 ► pp. 103 ff.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2004. Introducing polylogue. Journal of Pragmatics 36:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kern, Friederike & Margret Selting
2012. Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Kern, Friederike & Margret Selting
2020. Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Kikuchi, Kouhei
2008. Turn-taking Mechanism in Japanese Sign Language Conversation. Japanese Journal of Sign Language Studies 17:0 ► pp. 29 ff.
Kim, Kyu-hyun
1999. Phrasal Unit Boundaries and Organization of Turns and Sequences in Korean Conversation. Human Studies 22:2-4 ► pp. 425 ff.
Kim, Kyu-hyun
2022. Sequential organization of post-predicate elements in Korean conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 573 ff.
Lerner, Gene H. & Tomoyo Takagi
1999. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics 31:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Li, Xiaoting
2016. Some interactional uses of syntactically incomplete turns in Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:2 ► pp. 237 ff.
Li, Xiaoting
2021. Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 549 ff.
Lilja, Niina & Arja Piirainen-Marsh
2019. How Hand Gestures Contribute to Action Ascription. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:4 ► pp. 343 ff.
Luke, K.K. & Mei Fang
2021. Special issue on joint production of conversational turns. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Luke, Kang-kwong & Wei Zhang
2022. Retrospective turn continuations in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 605 ff.
Markee, N.
2007. Toward a Learning Behavior Tracking Methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics 29:3 ► pp. 404 ff.
Matsumoto, Kazuko
2003. Unit linking in conversational Japanese. Language Sciences 25:5 ► pp. 433 ff.
Mira, Caio
2016. CONVERSAÇÃO NAS AFASIAS: UMA ANÁLISE DO TÓPICO DISCURSIVO E DO TURNO CONVERSACIONAL SOB A PERSPECTIVA TEXTUAL-INTERATIVA. Linguagem em (Dis)curso 16:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza
2007. Multimodal resources for turn-taking. Discourse Studies 9:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza
2014. The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 65 ► pp. 137 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza
2015. Multimodal completions. In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27], ► pp. 267 ff.
Mori, Junko
2014. The re-examination of so-called ‘clefts’: A study of multiunit turns in Japanese
talk-in-interaction. In Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 156], ► pp. 193 ff.
Morof, Julia
2018. Patterns of construction in spoken French. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:1 ► pp. 159 ff.
Mushin, Ilana, Joe Blythe, Josua Dahmen, Caroline de Dear, Rod Gardner, Francesco Possemato & Lesley Stirling
2023. Towards an interactional grammar of interjections: Expressing compassion in four Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 43:2 ► pp. 158 ff.
Mushin, Ilana & Simona Pekarek Doehler
Nakamura, Kanae
2018. Chapter 4. “Late projectability” of Japanese turns revisited. In Pragmatics of Japanese [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 285], ► pp. 99 ff.
Nikiforidou, Kiki
Park, Innhwa & Jacob Kline
2020. Incomplete utterances as critical assessments. Discourse Studies 22:4 ► pp. 441 ff.
Park, Jae-Eun
2016. Turn-taking in Korean conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 99 ► pp. 62 ff.
Pauletto, Franco
2020. L’analisi della conversazione per valutare l’autenticità dei materiali audio per l’insegnamento dell’italiano L2: una proposta metodologica. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 7:2 ► pp. 28 ff.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
2011. Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: the on-line formatting of left and right dislocations in French conversation. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ► pp. 45 ff.
Persson, Rasmus
2017. Fill-in-the-Blank Questions in Interaction: Incomplete Utterances as a Resource for Doing Inquiries. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50:3 ► pp. 227 ff.
Persson, Rasmus
2017. La prosodie comme ressource pour l’organisation de l’interaction : état des lieux et illustrations. Revue française de linguistique appliquée Vol. XXII:2 ► pp. 33 ff.
Piotrowski, Michał
2014. Prosody in Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 61 ► pp. 1 ff.
Pulles, Maaike, Jan Berenst, Kees de Glopper & Tom Koole
2020. Text selection proposals in dialogic reading in primary school. Pragmatics and Society 11:4 ► pp. 591 ff.
Riou, Marine
2015. A Methodology for the Identification of Topic Transitions in Interaction. Discours :16
Riou, Marine
2017. Transitioning to a new topic in American English conversation: A multi-level and mixed-methods account. Journal of Pragmatics 117 ► pp. 88 ff.
Roulet, Eddy
2001. A la frontière de l'ordre de la langue et de l'ord re du discours: a clause et l'acte. In Sprachkontakt, Sprachvergleich, Sprachvariation, ► pp. 297 ff.
Sidnell, Jack
2007. Comparative Studies in Conversation Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 36:1 ► pp. 229 ff.
Skidmore, David & Kyoko Murakami
2010. How prosody marks shifts in footing in classroom discourse. International Journal of Educational Research 49:2-3 ► pp. 69 ff.
Song, Zixuan & Stefana Vukadinovich
2021. Collaborative construction of turn constructional units in responsive positions of question-answer sequences in Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 12:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
Sparrow, Karen, Christopher Lind & Willem van Steenbrugge
2020. Gesture, communication, and adult acquired hearing loss. Journal of Communication Disorders 87 ► pp. 106030 ff.
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
Taboada, Maite
2022. Spontaneous and non-spontaneous turn-taking. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 329 ff.
Tanaka, Hiroko
2000. Turn Projection in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Turk, Monica J.
2004. Using and in Conversational Interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction 37:2 ► pp. 219 ff.
van Kruiningen, Jacqueline F.
2013. Educational design as conversation: A conversation analytical perspective on teacher dialogue. Teaching and Teacher Education 29 ► pp. 110 ff.
Vatanen, Anna
2018. Responding in Early Overlap: Recognitional Onsets in Assertion Sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:2 ► pp. 107 ff.
Vatanen, Anna, Tomoko Endo & Daisuke Yokomori
2021. Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Projection in Overlapping Agreements to Assertions: Stance-Taking as a Resource for Projection. Discourse Processes 58:4 ► pp. 308 ff.
Vranjes, Jelena & Geert Brône
2020. Chapter 8. Eye-tracking in interpreter-mediated talk. In Linking up with Video [Benjamins Translation Library, 149], ► pp. 203 ff.
Vranjes, Jelena, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts
2018. On the role of gaze in the organization of turn-taking and sequence organization in interpreter-mediated dialogue. Language and Dialogue 8:3 ► pp. 439 ff.
Walker, Gareth
2007. On the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 39:12 ► pp. 2217 ff.
Ward, Nigel & Wataru Tsukahara
2000. Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 32:8 ► pp. 1177 ff.
Weatherall, Ann
2011. I don't knowas a Prepositioned Epistemic Hedge. Research on Language & Social Interaction 44:4 ► pp. 317 ff.
Young, Richard F. & Elizabeth R. Miller
2004. Learning as Changing Participation: Discourse Roles in ESL Writing Conferences. The Modern Language Journal 88:4 ► pp. 519 ff.
Zawiszová, Halina
2018. On ´doing friendship´ in and through talk: Exploring conversational interactions of Japanese young people,
Zellers, Margaret
2017. Prosodic Variation and Segmental Reduction and Their Roles in Cuing Turn Transition in Swedish. Language and Speech 60:3 ► pp. 454 ff.
이진아
2013. L2 Learner’s Identities and Gender in ESL and EFL Classroom Interaction. English21 26:2 ► pp. 397 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. References. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ► pp. 741 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 3. Syntax in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 33 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 6. Interplay of syntax, prosody, body movements and pragmatic resources in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 195 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 7. Conclusion. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 241 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Glossing conventions. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. xi ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 5. Body movements in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 139 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 2. Preliminaries and methodology. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 23 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 4. Prosody in turn organization. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 71 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Transcription conventions. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. ix ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. References. In Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3], ► pp. 247 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.